IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6644-d1706365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Energy Quota Trading Policy a Solution to the Decarbonization of Energy Consumption in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyu Li

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China)

  • Bin Zhong

    (School of Economics and Management, Gannan University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Bingnan Guo

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China)

Abstract

The energy quota trading policy is a pivotal market-oriented environmental regulation policy that propels the reform of the energy structure. Utilizing panel data from 30 provinces in China covering the period from 2012 to 2022, this study employed a difference-in-differences model to systematically examine the influence of the energy quota trading policy on the decarbonization of energy consumption, and further explores two transmission mechanisms of green technology innovation and energy consumption intensity through mechanism tests. The study reveals several key findings: (1) The energy quota trading policy significantly enhances the decarbonization of energy consumption. (2) This policy encourages the adoption of clean energy by fostering green technological innovation and decreasing overall energy consumption. As a result, it makes a considerable contribution to the decarbonization process in energy usage. (3) The heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that in areas with low levels of industrialization and plentiful resources, as well as within the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the central and western regions, the effects of the policy are significantly more pronounced. Conversely, in regions characterized by high industrialization and limited resources, particularly in the eastern region, the effectiveness of the policy is comparatively diminished. Furthermore, this study not only offers empirical evidence supporting the optimization and enhancement of the energy quota trading policy but also presents recommendations for improving the trading market, regional policies, and fostering green technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyu Li & Bin Zhong & Bingnan Guo, 2025. "Is the Energy Quota Trading Policy a Solution to the Decarbonization of Energy Consumption in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6644-:d:1706365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Ambec & Mark A. Cohen & Stewart Elgie & Paul Lanoie, 2013. "The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 2-22, January.
    2. Kleibergen, Frank & Paap, Richard, 2006. "Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 97-126, July.
    3. Jacobson, Louis S & LaLonde, Robert J & Sullivan, Daniel G, 1993. "Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(4), pages 685-709, September.
    4. Gustavo de Andrade Melo & Paula Medina Maçaira & Fernando Luiz Cyrino Oliveira & Guilherme Armando de Almeida Pereira, 2025. "Socioeconomic Impacts of Renewable Energy Plants Through the Lens of the Triple Bottom Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Louis S. Jacobson & Robert J. LaLonde & Daniel G. Sullivan, 1993. "Long-term earnings losses of high-seniority displaced workers," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 17(Nov), pages 2-20.
    6. Lu Lv & Bingnan Guo, 2025. "Do Pilot Zones for Green Finance Reform and Innovation Policy Enhance China’s Energy Resilience?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Samuel Alexander & Joshua Floyd, 2020. "The Political Economy of Deep Decarbonization: Tradable Energy Quotas for Energy Descent Futures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Stephen R. Bond, 2002. "Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 1(2), pages 141-162, August.
    9. Stephen Bond, 2002. "Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice," CeMMAP working papers 09/02, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Ye, Danfeng & Zhao, Yating & Liao, Liping, 2023. "Exploring the effects of energy quota trading policy on carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    11. Huan Wang & Yangyang Shen & Ting Luo & Fang Wang & Yunqiang Liu, 2025. "The chain reaction of carbon emission trading policy in efficiency and rebound: evidence from spatial perspective in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Jiang, Tangyang & Guo, Qimeng & Yu, Jinghan & Jahanger, Atif & Yu, Yang & Li, Xiaolong, 2025. "Spatial mismatch of resources in China under the “dual-carbon” goal: A new perspective incorporating energy and environmental factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    13. Pham, Linh & Pham, Son & Do, Hung & Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Brooks, Robert, 2025. "Common volatility in clean energy stocks," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. Stephen Bond, 2002. "Dynamic panel data models: a guide to microdata methods and practice," CeMMAP working papers CWP09/02, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Pan, Yuling & Dong, Feng, 2022. "Design of energy use rights trading policy from the perspective of energy vulnerability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Cui, Huanyu & Cao, Yuequn, 2024. "Energy rights trading policy, spatial spillovers, and energy utilization performance: Evidence from Chinese cities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Lars J. Nilsson & Fredric Bauer & Max Åhman & Fredrik N. G. Andersson & Chris Bataille & Stephane de la Rue du Can & Karin Ericsson & Teis Hansen & Bengt Johansson & Stefan Lechtenböhmer & Mariësse va, 2021. "An industrial policy framework for transforming energy and emissions intensive industries towards zero emissions," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1053-1065, September.
    18. Cheng, Zhen & Ding, Chante Jian & Zhao, Kunqian, 2025. "Energy use rights trading and carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    19. Dedeoğlu, Dinçer & Kaya, Hüseyin, 2013. "Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: New evidence from the OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 469-476.
    20. Wang, Juan & Li, Ziming & Wang, Yanan, 2024. "How does China's energy-consumption trading policy affect the carbon abatement costs? An analysis based on spatial difference-in-differences method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe & Liu, Yang & Shen, Zhiyang & Vardanyan, Michael, 2024. "Is energy aid allocated fairly? A global energy vulnerability perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Shrestha, Chaman & Andrikopoulos, Panagiotis & Park, Jin Suk, 2025. "ESG rating and financial performance in the emerging markets: The moderating effects of cross-listing and industry type," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PA).
    3. Marta Marson, 2025. "Effects of public expenditure for agriculture on food security in Africa," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 68(6), pages 2673-2704, June.
    4. Lingling Zhang & Yufeng Wang & Rahman Dunya, 2023. "How Does Environmental Regulation Affect the Development of China’s Pig Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Pinkston, Joshua C., 2017. "The dynamic effects of obesity on the wages of young workers," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 154-166.
    6. Carlos Carreira & Luís Lopes, 2016. "Collecting new pieces to the regional knowledge spillovers puzzle: high-tech versus low-tech industries," GEMF Working Papers 2016-06, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    7. Falavigna, Greta & Ippoliti, Roberto, 2023. "SMEs’ behavior under financial constraints: An empirical investigation on the legal environment and the substitution effect with tax arrears," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Charles Yuji Horioka & Junmin Wan, 2007. "The Determinants of Household Saving in China: A Dynamic Panel Analysis of Provincial Data," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(8), pages 2077-2096, December.
    9. Wang, Lisha & Pan, Minjie & Qian, Xinlei & Lv, Kangjuan, 2025. "Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Isaak, Andrew & Istipliler, Baris & Bort, Suleika & Woywode, Michael, 2025. "Regulation, Corruption, and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: Insights from Bitcoin Trading and Platform Founding Between 2011 and 2023," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue ahead of .
    11. Meles, Antonio & Salerno, Dario & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo & Zhang, Jianing, 2023. "The influence of green innovation on default risk: Evidence from Europe," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 692-710.
    12. Aixing Li & Ke Gong & Jiashun Li & Li Zhang & Xueting Luo, 2025. "Is Monopolization Inevitable in Proof-of-Work Blockchains? Insights from Miner Scale Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(3), pages 1825-1850, September.
    13. Ayman Hassan Bazhair & Mohammed Naif Alshareef, 2022. "Dynamic relationship between ownership structure and financial performance: a Saudi experience," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2098636-209, December.
    14. Fendel Tanja, 2016. "Migration and Regional Wage Disparities in Germany," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 236(1), pages 3-35, February.
    15. Jonathan Emenike Ogbuabor & Christian Agu & Benjamin Udoka Onah & Chinasa E. Urama, 2025. "Economic Complexity and Sectoral Performance in Africa: The Role of Economic Governance Institutions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4557-4576, June.
    16. Maria Bas & Ivan Ledezma, 2010. "Trade integration and within-plant productivity evolution in Chile," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 146(1), pages 113-146, April.
    17. Juergen Bitzer & Erkan Goeren, 2018. "Foreign Aid and Subnational Development: A Grid Cell Analysis," Working Papers V-407-18, University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, revised Mar 2018.
    18. Jamil, Abd Rahim Md. & Law, Siong Hook & Mohamad Khair-Afham, M.S. & Trinugroho, Irwan, 2023. "Financial inclusion and economic uncertainty in developing countries: The role of digitalisation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 786-806.
    19. Tan, Ruipeng & Hou, Ke & Wu, Huaqing, 2025. "The cost of biodiversity protection: National Key Ecological Functional Zone and labor demand in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Scott, K. Rebecca, 2015. "Demand and price uncertainty: Rational habits in international gasoline demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 40-49.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6644-:d:1706365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.