IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v103y2019icp287-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of attrition and attendance in a fatherhood education program

Author

Listed:
  • Laxman, Daniel J.
  • Higginbotham, Brian J.
  • Bradford, Kay

Abstract

This study examined risk-factors for attrition (drop out) and poor attendance of 1040 fathers enrolled in a five-session fatherhood education program with an emphasis on parenting. Demographic factors (including socioeconomic status), fathers' relationship status, level of relationship conflict, social support, psychological distress, and parenting stress were evaluated for their impact on attrition and attendance. Furthermore, the impact of financial incentives was considered. Results indicated that education, income, age, and relationship conflict were associated with attrition and/or missed sessions. Attrition and attendance did not vary by incentive amount. Implications of these findings for policy and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Laxman, Daniel J. & Higginbotham, Brian J. & Bradford, Kay, 2019. "Predictors of attrition and attendance in a fatherhood education program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 287-297.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:287-297
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740919300441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Axford, Nick & Lehtonen, Minna & Kaoukji, Dwan & Tobin, Kate & Berry, Vashti, 2012. "Engaging parents in parenting programs: Lessons from research and practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2061-2071.
    2. Stahlschmidt, Mary Jo & Threlfall, Jennifer & Seay, Kristen D. & Lewis, Ericka M. & Kohl, Patricia L., 2013. "Recruiting fathers to parenting programs: Advice from dads and fatherhood program providers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 1734-1741.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:5864 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ronald L. Wasserstein & Nicole A. Lazar, 2016. "The ASA's Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(2), pages 129-133, May.
    5. M. Robin Dion & Heather Zaveri & Pamela Holcomb, 2015. "Responsible Fatherhood Programs in the Parents and Children Together (PACT) Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 10fa58b56a0f43c1acc0315b4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolia, Andrea C. & Fabiano, Gregory A. & Gordon, Chanelle T., 2020. "An investigation of predictors of attendance for fathers in behavioral parent training programs for children with ADHD," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Quetsch, Lauren Borduin & Girard, Emma I. & McNeil, Cheryl B., 2020. "The impact of incentives on treatment adherence and attrition: A randomized controlled trial of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with a primarily Latinx, low-income population," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Godfrey E. Siu & Daniel Wight & Janet Seeley & Carolyn Namutebi & Richard Sekiwunga & Flavia Zalwango & Sarah Kasule, 2017. "Men’s Involvement in a Parenting Programme to Reduce Child Maltreatment and Gender-Based Violence: Formative Evaluation in Uganda," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 29(5), pages 1017-1037, November.
    2. Jyotirmoy Sarkar, 2018. "Will P†Value Triumph over Abuses and Attacks?," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 7(4), pages 66-71, July.
    3. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2018. "Publish and Perish: Creative Destruction and Macroeconomic Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 65-101.
    4. Segurado, Pedro & Gutiérrez-Cánovas, Cayetano & Ferreira, Teresa & Branco, Paulo, 2022. "Stressor gradient coverage affects interaction identification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    5. Uwe Hassler & Marc‐Oliver Pohle, 2022. "Unlucky Number 13? Manipulating Evidence Subject to Snooping," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 397-410, August.
    6. Kim, Jae H., 2017. "Stock returns and investors' mood: Good day sunshine or spurious correlation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 94-103.
    7. Gergely Ganics & Atsushi Inoue & Barbara Rossi, 2021. "Confidence Intervals for Bias and Size Distortion in IV and Local Projections-IV Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 307-324, January.
    8. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    9. Harknett, Kristen & Mancini, Patrizia & Knox, Virginia, 2022. "Improvements in father-child interactions: Video observations from the Just Beginning study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Oliver Schilke & Sheen S. Levine & Olenka Kacperczyk & Lynne G. Zucker, 2019. "Call for Papers-Special Issue on Experiments in Organizational Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 232-234, February.
    11. Lopez, Belen & Rangel, Celia & Fernández, Manuel, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility strategy on the management and governance axis for sustainable growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 690-698.
    12. Michaelides, Michael, 2021. "Large sample size bias in empirical finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Kelter, Riko, 2022. "Power analysis and type I and type II error rates of Bayesian nonparametric two-sample tests for location-shifts based on the Bayes factor under Cauchy priors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Scott, E. Marian, 2018. "The role of Statistics in the era of big data: Crucial, critical and under-valued," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 20-24.
    15. Xian Jin Xie, 2019. "Research Reproducibility and p-value Threshold," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 22(5), pages 16934-16936, November.
    16. Chatelain, Jean-Bernard & Ralf, Kirsten, 2021. "Inference on time-invariant variables using panel data: A pretest estimator," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 157-166.
    17. Karmakar, Bisheswar & Pal, Sucharita & Gopikrishna, Konga & Tiwari, Onkar Nath & Halder, Gopinath, 2022. "Injection of superheated C1 and C3 alcohols in non-edible Pongamia pinnata oil for semi-continuous uncatalyzed biodiesel synthesis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 850-861.
    18. Maurizio Canavari & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Jayson L. Lusk & Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., 2018. "How to run an experimental auction: A review of recent advances," Working Papers 2018-5, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.
    19. Li, Yu & Gao, Xiangyun & An, Sufang & Zheng, Huiling & Wu, Tao, 2021. "Network approach to the dynamic transformation characteristics of the joint impacts of gold and oil on copper," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Nicolas Vallois & Dorian Jullien, 2017. "Estimating Rationality in Economics: A History of Statistical Methods in Experimental Economics," Working Papers halshs-01651070, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:287-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.