IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v69y2014icp81-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexible modeling of survival data with covariates subject to detection limits via multiple imputation

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhardt, Paul W.
  • Wang, Huixia Judy
  • Zhang, Daowen

Abstract

Models for survival data generally assume that covariates are fully observed. However, in medical studies it is not uncommon for biomarkers to be censored at known detection limits. A computationally-efficient multiple imputation procedure for modeling survival data with covariates subject to detection limits is proposed. This procedure is developed in the context of an accelerated failure time model with a flexible seminonparametric error distribution. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the multiple imputation estimator are established and a consistent variance estimator is provided. An iterative version of the proposed multiple imputation algorithm that approximates the EM algorithm for maximum likelihood is also suggested. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed multiple imputation methods work well while alternative methods lead to estimates that are either biased or more variable. The proposed methods are applied to analyze the dataset from a recently-conducted GenIMS study.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhardt, Paul W. & Wang, Huixia Judy & Zhang, Daowen, 2014. "Flexible modeling of survival data with covariates subject to detection limits via multiple imputation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 81-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:81-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313002727
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rigobon, Roberto & Stoker, Thomas M., 2009. "Bias From Censored Regressors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 340-353.
    2. Roberto Rigobon & Thomas M. Stoker, 2007. "Estimation With Censored Regressors: Basic Issues," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1441-1467, November.
    3. Lee, Sungim & Park, S. H. & Park, Jinho, 2003. "The proportional hazards regression with a censored covariate," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 309-319, February.
    4. Gallant, A Ronald & Nychka, Douglas W, 1987. "Semi-nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 363-390, March.
    5. Daowen Zhang & Marie Davidian, 2001. "Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 795-802, September.
    6. Martin, Andrew D. & Quinn, Kevin M. & Park, Jong Hee, 2011. "MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 42(i09).
    7. Austin P.C. & Brunner L.J., 2003. "Type I Error Inflation in the Presence of a Ceiling Effect," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 57, pages 97-104, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Bernhardt Paul W., 2018. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation in a Semicontinuous Survival Model with Covariates Subject to Detection Limits," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Tonghui Yu & Liming Xiang & Huixia Judy Wang, 2021. "Quantile regression for survival data with covariates subject to detection limits," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 610-621, June.
    4. Bernhardt, Paul W. & Zhang, Daowen & Wang, Huixia Judy, 2015. "A fast EM algorithm for fitting joint models of a binary response and multiple longitudinal covariates subject to detection limits," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 37-53.
    5. Hongbin Zhang & Lang Wu, 2018. "A non‐linear model for censored and mismeasured time varying covariates in survival models, with applications in human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immune deficiency syndrome studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1437-1450, November.
    6. Schelin, Lina & Sjöstedt-de Luna, Sara, 2014. "Spatial prediction in the presence of left-censoring," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 125-141.
    7. Lee, Min Cherng & Mitra, Robin, 2016. "Multiply imputing missing values in data sets with mixed measurement scales using a sequence of generalised linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 24-38.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erfan Rezvani & Christian Rojas, 2022. "Firm responsiveness to consumers' reviews: The effect on online reputation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 898-922, November.
    2. Anna Gumpert & James R. Hines, Jr. & Monika Schnitzer, 2011. "The Use of Tax Havens in Exemption Regimes," NBER Working Papers 17644, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Min Zhang & Marie Davidian, 2008. "“Smooth” Semiparametric Regression Analysis for Arbitrarily Censored Time-to-Event Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 567-576, June.
    4. Laine Thomas & Leonard Stefanski & Marie Davidian, 2011. "A Moment-Adjusted Imputation Method for Measurement Error Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1461-1470, December.
    5. Weiping Zhang & MengMeng Zhang & Yu Chen, 2020. "A Copula-Based GLMM Model for Multivariate Longitudinal Data with Mixed-Types of Responses," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 353-379, November.
    6. Xiao Song & Marie Davidian & Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2002. "A Semiparametric Likelihood Approach to Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 742-753, December.
    7. Scolas, Sylvie & El Ghouch, Anouar & Legrand, Catherine, 2016. "The SNP representation in mixture cure models with interval-censoring: estimation and goodness-of-fit testing," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016049, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    8. John Gilbert & Reza Oladi, 2012. "Net campaign contributions, agricultural interests, and votes on liberalizing trade with China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 745-769, March.
    9. Caselli, Francesco & Tesei, Andrea, 2011. "Resource windfalls, political regimes, and political stability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121753, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Jaeun Choi & Donglin Zeng & Andrew F. Olshan & Jianwen Cai, 2018. "Joint modeling of survival time and longitudinal outcomes with flexible random effects," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 126-152, January.
    11. Folefac D. Atem & Jing Qian & Jacqueline E. Maye & Keith A. Johnson & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2017. "Linear regression with a randomly censored covariate: application to an Alzheimer's study," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(2), pages 313-328, February.
    12. Ho, Remus K.W. & Hu, Inchi, 2008. "Flexible modelling of random effects in linear mixed models--A Bayesian approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1347-1361, January.
    13. Cooper, Joseph C., 2002. "Flexible Functional Form Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Dichotomous Choice Data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 267-279, March.
    14. Nguimkeu, Pierre & Denteh, Augustine & Tchernis, Rusty, 2019. "On the estimation of treatment effects with endogenous misreporting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 487-506.
    15. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2008:i:42:p:1-13 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Yang Lu, 2019. "Flexible (panel) regression models for bivariate count–continuous data with an insurance application," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(4), pages 1503-1521, October.
    17. Fosgerau, Mogens & Bierlaire, Michel, 2007. "A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 784-794, August.
    18. Hengtao Zhang & Guosheng Yin, 2021. "Response‐adaptive rerandomization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(5), pages 1281-1298, November.
    19. Čížek, Pavel, 2008. "General Trimmed Estimation: Robust Approach To Nonlinear And Limited Dependent Variable Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(6), pages 1500-1529, December.
    20. Jurczenko, Emmanuel & Maillet, Bertrand & Negrea, Bogdan, 2002. "Revisited multi-moment approximate option pricing models: a general comparison (Part 1)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24950, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:69:y:2014:i:c:p:81-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.