Testing for two components in a switching regression model
Switching regression models form a suitable model class for regression problems with unobserved heterogeneity. A basic issue encountered in applications of switching regression models is to choose the number of states of the switching regime. Based on the modified likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic a test for two against more states of the regime is proposed, and its asymptotic distribution is derived in the case when there is a single switching parameter. Further, it is shown that the asymptotic distribution of the test remains unchanged if the regime is Markov dependent. A simulation study illustrates the finite-sample behavior of the test. Finally, the methodology is applied to the data of a dental health trial. In this case the model selection criteria AIC and BIC favor distinct binomial regression models with switching intercepts (AIC three states, BIC two states). The modified LRT allows us to reject the null hypothesis of two states in favor of three states.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Xie, Feng-Chang & Wei, Bo-Cheng & Lin, Jin-Guan, 2009. "Score tests for zero-inflated generalized Poisson mixed regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3478-3489, July.
- Naik, Prasad A. & Shi, Peide & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2007. "Extending the Akaike Information Criterion to Mixture Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 244-254, March.
- Hong-Tu Zhu & Heping Zhang, 2004. "Hypothesis testing in mixture regression models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 3-16.
- Bettina Grün & Friedrich Leisch, 2008. "Identifiability of Finite Mixtures of Multinomial Logit Models with Varying and Fixed Effects," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(2), pages 225-247, November.
- Hanfeng Chen & Jiahua Chen & John D. Kalbfleisch, 2001. "A modified likelihood ratio test for homogeneity in finite mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 19-29.
- Hanfeng Chen & Jiahua Chen & John D. Kalbfleisch, 2004. "Testing for a finite mixture model with two components," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(1), pages 95-115.
- Khalili, Abbas & Chen, Jiahua, 2007. "Variable Selection in Finite Mixture of Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1025-1038, September.
- Kiefer, Nicholas M, 1978. "Discrete Parameter Variation: Efficient Estimation of a Switching Regression Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 427-434, March.
- D. Böhning & E. Dietz & P. Schlattmann & L. Mendonça & U. Kirchner, 1999. "The zero-inflated Poisson model and the decayed, missing and filled teeth index in dental epidemiology," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 162(2), pages 195-209.
- Bohning, Dankmar & Seidel, Wilfried & Alfo, Macro & Garel, Bernard & Patilea, Valentin & Walther, Gunther, 2007. "Advances in Mixture Models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 5205-5210, July.
- Chen, Jiahua & Khalili, Abbas, 2009. "Order Selection in Finite Mixture Models With a Nonsmooth Penalty," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(485), pages 187-196.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:54:y:2010:i:6:p:1592-1604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.