IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v45y2004i3p457-466.html

A note on split selection bias in classification trees

Author

Listed:
  • Shih, Y. -S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih, Y. -S., 2004. "A note on split selection bias in classification trees," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 457-466, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:45:y:2004:i:3:p:457-466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(03)00064-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim H. & Loh W.Y., 2001. "Classification Trees With Unbiased Multiway Splits," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 589-604, June.
    2. G. V. Kass, 1980. "An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 119-127, June.
    3. Aaron L. Halpern, 1999. "Minimally Selected P and Other Tests for A Single Abrupt Changepoint in A Binary Sequence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1044-1050, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Augustin, Thomas, 2007. "Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 483-501, September.
    2. Archer, Kellie J. & Kimes, Ryan V., 2008. "Empirical characterization of random forest variable importance measures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2249-2260, January.
    3. Carolin Strobl & Julia Kopf & Achim Zeileis, 2015. "Rasch Trees: A New Method for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 289-316, June.
    4. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2016. "Item-focussed Trees for the Identification of Items in Differential Item Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 727-750, September.
    5. Shu-Fu Kuo & Yu-Shan Shih, 2012. "Variable selection for functional density trees," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 1387-1395, December.
    6. Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Strobl, Carolin, 2007. "Maximally selected Chi-squared statistics and non-monotonic associations: An exact approach based on two cutpoints," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 6295-6306, August.
    7. Wei-Yin Loh, 2014. "Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(3), pages 329-348, December.
    8. Peters, A. & Hothorn, T. & Lausen, B., 2005. "Generalised indirect classifiers," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 849-861, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Strobl, Carolin & Boulesteix, Anne-Laure & Augustin, Thomas, 2007. "Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 483-501, September.
    2. Emilio Carrizosa & Cristina Molero-Río & Dolores Romero Morales, 2021. "Mathematical optimization in classification and regression trees," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(1), pages 5-33, April.
    3. Christophe Dutang & Quentin Guibert, 2021. "An explicit split point procedure in model-based trees allowing for a quick fitting of GLM trees and GLM forests," Post-Print hal-03448250, HAL.
    4. Gray, J. Brian & Fan, Guangzhe, 2008. "Classification tree analysis using TARGET," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 1362-1372, January.
    5. Hache, Emmanuel & Leboullenger, Déborah & Mignon, Valérie, 2017. "Beyond average energy consumption in the French residential housing market: A household classification approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 82-95.
    6. Kim, Ahhyoun & Kim, Hyunjoong, 2022. "A new classification tree method with interaction detection capability," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    7. Hayk Manucharyan, 2020. "How do managers actually choose suppliers? Evidence from revealed preference data," Working Papers 2020-12, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    8. Omerašević Amela & Selimović Jasmina, 2020. "Classification Ratemaking Using Decision Tree in the Insurance Market of Bosnia and Herzegovina," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 15(2), pages 124-139, December.
    9. Ghosh, Atish R. & Qureshi, Mahvash S. & Kim, Jun Il & Zalduendo, Juan, 2014. "Surges," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 266-285.
      • Mahvash S Qureshi & Mr. Atish R. Ghosh & Mr. Juan Zalduendo & Mr. Jun I Kim, 2012. "Surges," IMF Working Papers 2012/022, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Xuedong Yan & Fan Zhang & Dan Gao & Chen Zeng & Wang Xiang & Man Zhang, 2013. "Accumulations of Heavy Metals in Roadside Soils Close to Zhaling, Eling and Nam Co Lakes in the Tibetan Plateau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Tomàs Aluja-Banet & Eduard Nafria, 2003. "Stability and scalability in decision trees," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 505-520, September.
    12. I. Albarrán & P. Alonso-González & J. M. Marin, 2017. "Some criticism to a general model in Solvency II: an explanation from a clustering point of view," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1289-1308, June.
    13. Schwartz, Ira M. & York, Peter & Nowakowski-Sims, Eva & Ramos-Hernandez, Ana, 2017. "Predictive and prescriptive analytics, machine learning and child welfare risk assessment: The Broward County experience," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 309-320.
    14. Israel‐Javier Juma‐Michilena & Maria‐Eugenia Ruiz‐Molina & Irene Gil‐Saura & Sergio Belda‐Miquel, 2023. "How to increase students' motivation to engage in university initiatives towards environmental sustainability," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 1304-1323, July.
    15. Bernard Bracy, Jill M. & Bao, Ken Q. & Mundy, Ray A., 2019. "Highway infrastructure and safety implications of AV technology in the motor carrier industry," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Yousaf Muhammad & Dey Sandeep Kumar, 2022. "Best proxy to determine firm performance using financial ratios: A CHAID approach," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 219-239, September.
    17. Ralf Elsner & Manfred Krafft & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2003. "Optimizing Rhenania's Mail-Order Business Through Dynamic Multilevel Modeling (DMLM)," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 50-66, February.
    18. Serrano-Cinca, Carlos & Gutiérrez-Nieto, Begoña & Bernate-Valbuena, Martha, 2019. "The use of accounting anomalies indicators to predict business failure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 353-375.
    19. Chih-Chiang Wei, 2012. "Discretized and Continuous Target Fields for the Reservoir Release Rules During Floods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(12), pages 3457-3477, September.
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0193873 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Uğur Ercan, 2021. "The Determinants of Turkey Household Catastrophic Health Expenditures: A Different Approach by Data Mining," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 9(2), pages 229-246, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:45:y:2004:i:3:p:457-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.