IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v154y2021ics0167947320301390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of regional transition probabilities for spatial dynamic microsimulations from survey data lacking in regional detail

Author

Listed:
  • Burgard, Jan Pablo
  • Krause, Joscha
  • Schmaus, Simon

Abstract

Spatial dynamic microsimulations allow for the multivariate analysis of complex systems with geographic segmentation. A synthetic replica of the system is stochastically projected into future periods using micro-level transition probabilities. These should accurately represent the dynamics of the system to allow for reliable simulation outcomes. In practice, transition probabilities are unknown and must be estimated from suitable survey data. This can be challenging when the dynamics vary locally. Survey data often lacks in regional detail due to confidentiality restrictions and limited sampling resources. In that case, transition probability estimates may misrepresent regional dynamics due to insufficient local observations and coverage problems. The simulation process subsequently fails to provide an authentic evolution of the system. A constrained maximum likelihood approach for probability alignment to solve these issues is proposed. It accounts for regional heterogeneity in transition dynamics through the consideration of external benchmarks from administrative records. It is proven that the method is consistent. A parametric bootstrap for uncertainty estimation is presented. Simulation experiments are conducted to compare the approach with an existing method for probability alignment. Furthermore, an empirical application to labor force estimation based on the German Microcensus is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Burgard, Jan Pablo & Krause, Joscha & Schmaus, Simon, 2021. "Estimation of regional transition probabilities for spatial dynamic microsimulations from survey data lacking in regional detail," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:154:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320301390
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2020.107048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947320301390
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2020.107048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Klevmarken, 2022. "Microsimulation for Public Policy. Experiences from the Swedish Model SESIM," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 15(1), pages 153-185.
    2. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    3. Jinjing Li & Cathal O'Donoghue, 2014. "Evaluating Binary Alignment Methods in Microsimulation Models," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Forcina, Antonio, 2017. "A Fisher-scoring algorithm for fitting latent class models with individual covariates," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 3(C), pages 132-140.
    5. Schmid, Matthias & Tutz, Gerhard & Welchowski, Thomas, 2018. "Discrimination measures for discrete time-to-event predictions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 153-164.
    6. Robert Tanton, 2018. "Spatial Microsimulation: Developments and Potential Future Directions," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 143-161.
    7. Nilanjan Chatterjee & Yi-Hau Chen & Paige Maas & Raymond J. Carroll, 2016. "Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-Level Information From External Big Data Sources," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 107-117, March.
    8. Jinjing Li & Cathal O'Donoghue, 2013. "A survey of dynamic microsimulation models: uses, model structure and methodology," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 6(2), pages 3-55.
    9. Peichl, Andreas & Schneider, Hilmar & Siegloch, Sebastian, 2010. "Documentation IZA?MOD: The IZA Policy SImulation MODel," IZA Discussion Papers 4865, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Azizur Rahman & Ann Harding & Robert Tanton & Shuangzhe Liu, 2010. "Methodological Issues in Spatial Microsimulation Modelling for Small Area Estimation," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 3(2), pages 3-22.
    11. Holly Sutherland & Francesco Figari, 2013. "EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 1(6), pages 4-26.
    12. Peter Stephensen, 2016. "Logit Scaling: A General Method for Alignment in Microsimulation models," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 9(3), pages 89-102.
    13. Robert Tanton, 2014. "A Review of Spatial Microsimulation Methods," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 7(1), pages 4-25.
    14. Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Dennis Kreber, 2019. "Regularized Area-level Modelling for Robust Small Area Estimation in the Presence of Unknown Covariate Measurement Errors," Research Papers in Economics 2019-04, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    15. Abhik Ghosh & Magne Thoresen, 2018. "Non-concave penalization in linear mixed-effect models and regularized selection of fixed effects," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 179-210, April.
    16. Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Simon Schmaus, 2019. "Estimation of Regional Transition Probabilities for Spatial Dynamic Microsimulations from Survey Data Lacking in Regional Detail," Research Papers in Economics 2019-12, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julian Ernst & Sebastian Dräger & Simon Schmaus & Jan Weymeirsch & Ahmed Alsaloum & Ralf Münnich, 2023. "The Influence of Migration Patterns on Regional Demographic Development in Germany," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Simon Schmaus, 2019. "Estimation of Regional Transition Probabilities for Spatial Dynamic Microsimulations from Survey Data Lacking in Regional Detail," Research Papers in Economics 2019-12, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    2. Jan Pablo Burgard & Hanna Dieckmann & Joscha Krause & Hariolf Merkle & Ralf Münnich & Kristina M. Neufang & Simon Schmaus, 2020. "A generic business process model for conducting microsimulation studies," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 191-211, August.
    3. Burgard Jan Pablo & Dieckmann Hanna & Krause Joscha & Merkle Hariolf & Münnich Ralf & Neufang Kristina M. & Schmaus Simon, 2020. "A generic business process model for conducting microsimulation studies," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 191-211, August.
    4. Sebastian Dräger & Johannes Kopp & Ralf Münnich & Simon Schmaus, 2022. "Die zukünftige Entwicklung der Grundschulversorgung im Kontext ausgewählter Wanderungsszenarien [The future development of primary school demand in the context of selected migration scenarios]," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 16(1), pages 51-77, March.
    5. Richiardi, Matteo & Bronka, Patryk & van de Ven, Justin, 2023. "Back to the future: Agent-based modelling and dynamic microsimulation," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA8/23, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    6. Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Dennis Kreber & Domingo Morales, 2021. "The generalized equivalence of regularization and min–max robustification in linear mixed models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(6), pages 2857-2883, December.
    7. Johannes Geyer & Salmai Qari & Hermann Buslei & Peter Haan, 2021. "DySiMo Dokumentation: Version 1.0," Data Documentation 101, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    8. Sebastian Dräger & Johannes Kopp & Ralf Münnich & Simon Schmaus, 2021. "Analyse der Grundschulversorgung in Trier mit Hilfe kleinräumiger Mikrosimulationsmodelle," Research Papers in Economics 2021-01, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    9. Matteo Richiardi & Ross E. Richardson, 2017. "JAS-mine: A new platform for microsimulation and agent-based modelling," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 10(1), pages 106-134.
    10. Simona Buscemi & Antonella Plaia, 2020. "Model selection in linear mixed-effect models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 529-575, December.
    11. Ranđelović Saša & Žarković Rakić Jelena & Vladisavljević Marko & Vujić Sunčica, 2019. "Labour Supply and Inequality Effects of In-Work Benefits: Evidence from Serbia," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 65(3), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Didier Blanchet & Cyrille Hagneré & François Legendre & Florence Thibault, 2015. "Introduction. Microsimulations statique et dynamique appliquées aux politiques fiscales et sociales : modèles et méthodes," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 481(1), pages 5-30.
    13. repec:ijm:journl:v109:y:2017:i:1:p:167-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Magalasi, Chimwemwe, 2021. "The short-term distributional impact of COVID-19 in Malawi," EUROMOD Working Papers EM7/21, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Jinjing Li & Cathal O'Donoghue, 2013. "A survey of dynamic microsimulation models: uses, model structure and methodology," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 6(2), pages 3-55.
    16. repec:ijm:journl:v109:y:2017:i:1:p:106-134 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Denisa M. Sologon & Cathal O’Donoghue & Iryna Kyzyma & Jinjing Li & Jules Linden & Raymond Wagener, 2022. "The COVID-19 resilience of a continental welfare regime - nowcasting the distributional impact of the crisis," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(4), pages 777-809, December.
    18. Matteo Richiardi, 2018. "Editorial," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-3.
    19. Frederik Priem & Philip Stessens & Frank Canters, 2020. "Microsimulation of Residential Activity for Alternative Urban Development Scenarios: A Case Study on Brussels and Flemish Brabant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Islam, Nizamul & Flood, Lennart, 2015. "A Tax Benefit Model for Policy Evaluation in Luxembourg: LuxTaxBen," IZA Discussion Papers 9152, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    22. H. Xavier Jara & Lourdes Montesdeoca & Iva Tasseva, 2022. "The Role of Automatic Stabilizers and Emergency Tax–Benefit Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Ecuador," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(6), pages 2787-2809, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:154:y:2021:i:c:s0167947320301390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.