IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/crpeac/v96y2023ics1045235422001228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings?

Author

Listed:
  • Argento, Daniela
  • van Helden, Jan

Abstract

Researchers are faced with increasing pressure to publish in top international journals, particularly public sector accounting (PSA) researchers due to the relatively lower ranking of journals in their field. Recruitment procedures for new staff members, protocols for the quality assessment of existing staff members, and decisions for funding research are increasingly affected by journal rankings. This paper aims to unravel the impact of the growing importance of journal rankings on the identity of PSA researchers. Professional identity is applied as a theoretical lens and so-called real-life constructs are developed for empirical investigation through interviews with senior researchers. The findings reveal how PSA researchers are coping with a context permeated by tensions between their original identity and an identity affected by a stronger reliance on scoring based on journal rankings. Our study shows in particular that PSA researchers tend to preserve their original identity of a committed PSA scholar and simultaneously move towards the “academic performer” identity by navigating the grey area between these extremes. There is no significant evidence for a fundamental identity shift towards an “academic performer” because researchers are primarily inspired by problems of public sector organizations or society at large. However, it remains to be seen if young scholars faced with publication targets that are too demanding and unrealistic shift their focus away from the original PSA researcher identity to an “academic performer” identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Argento, Daniela & van Helden, Jan, 2023. "Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:96:y:2023:i:c:s1045235422001228
    DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235422001228
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee D. Parker & James Guthrie, 2012. "Accounting scholars and journals rating and benchmarking: Risking academic research quality," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(1), pages 4-15, December.
    2. Hans Englund & Jonas Gerdin, 2020. "Contesting conformity: how and why academics may oppose the conforming influences of intra-organizational performance evaluations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 913-938, May.
    3. Rowlinson, Michael & Harvey, Charles & Kelly, Aidan & Morris, Huw & Todeva, Emanuela, 2015. "Accounting for research quality: Research audits and the journal rankings debate," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 2-22.
    4. Giorgia Mattei & Giuseppe Grossi & James Guthrie A.M., 2021. "Exploring past, present and future trends in public sector auditing research: a literature review," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(7), pages 94-134, November.
    5. Deryl Northcott & Simon Linacre, 2010. "Producing Spaces for Academic Discourse: The Impact of Research Assessment Exercises and Journal Quality Rankings," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(1), pages 38-54, March.
    6. Kuruppu, Chamara & Adhikari, Pawan & Gunarathna, Vijitha & Ambalangodage, Dayananda & Perera, Priyanga & Karunarathna, Chaminda, 2016. "Participatory budgeting in a Sri Lankan urban council: A practice of power and domination," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Giuseppe Grossi & Daniela Argento, 2022. "The fate of accounting for public governance development," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 272-303, August.
    8. Sara Giovanna Mauro & Lino Cinquini & Giuseppe Grossi, 2017. "Insights into performance-based budgeting in the public sector: a literature review and a research agenda," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 911-931, August.
    9. Yves Gendron, 2008. "Constituting the Academic Performer: The Spectre of Superficiality and Stagnation in Academia," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 97-127.
    10. Jane Broadbent & James Guthrie, 2008. "Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(2), pages 129-169, February.
    11. Rihab Khalifa & Paolo Quattrone, 2008. "The Governance of Accounting Academia: Issues for a Debate," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 65-86.
    12. Empson, Laura, 2004. "Organizational identity change: managerial regulation and member identification in an accounting firm acquisition," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 759-781, November.
    13. Jenny M. Lewis, 2014. "Research productivity and research system attitudes," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 417-424, November.
    14. Jan van Helden & Christoph Reichard, 2019. "Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 478-495, November.
    15. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-03-2019-3932 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Jan van Helden & Anders Grönlund & Riccardo Mussari & Pasquale Ruggiero, 2012. "Exploring public sector managers' preferences for attracting consultants or academics as external experts," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 205-227, August.
    17. Tourish, Dennis & Willmott, Hugh, 2015. "In Defiance of Folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 37-46.
    18. Gendron, Yves & Andrew, Jane & Cooper, Christine, 2022. "The perils of artificial intelligence in academic publishing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Gendron, Yves & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2021. "On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Alan Sangster, 2015. "You Cannot Judge a Book by Its Cover: The Problems with Journal Rankings," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 175-186, June.
    21. Mats Alvesson & Hugh Willmott, 2002. "Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 619-644, July.
    22. Humphrey, Christopher & Gendron, Yves, 2015. "What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-66.
    23. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Jeffrey Unerman, 2012. "Explicit and Implicit Subject Bias in the ABS Journal Quality Guide," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 3-15, December.
    24. Bikram Chatterjee & Carolyn Cordery & Ivo de Loo & Hugo Letiche, 2020. "The spectacle of research assessment systems: insights from New Zealand and the United Kingdom," Post-Print hal-03746988, HAL.
    25. Lasse Oulasvirta, 2021. "A consistent bottom-up approach for deriving a conceptual framework for public sector financial accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 436-446, August.
    26. Hellstrom, Caroline & Lapsley, Irvine, 2016. "Humour and happiness in an NPM world: Do they speak in jest?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 51-64.
    27. Kirsi-Mari Kallio & Tomi J. Kallio & Giuseppe Grossi, 2017. "Performance measurement in universities: ambiguities in the use of quality versus quantity in performance indicators," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 293-300, June.
    28. Ethan Bernick & Skip Krueger, 2010. "An Assessment of Journal Quality in Public Administration," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 98-106.
    29. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-08-2019-4133 is not listed on IDEAS
    30. Ann Martin-Sardesai & James Guthrie & Basil P. Tucker, 2020. "What you see depends on where you look: performance measurement of Australian accounting academics," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(6), pages 1193-1218, May.
    31. Rosenstreich, Daniela & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2009. "Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-index," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 227-239.
    32. Gebreiter, Florian, 2022. "A profession in peril? University corporatization, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    33. Cynthia Courtois & Maude Plante & Pier-Luc Lajoie, 2020. "Performance in neo-liberal doctorates: the making of academics," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(3), pages 465-494, June.
    34. Goddard, Andrew, 2010. "Contemporary public sector accounting research – An international comparison of journal papers," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 75-87.
    35. Henk J. ter Bogt & Robert W. Scapens, 2012. "Performance Management in Universities: Effects of the Transition to More Quantitative Measurement Systems," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 451-497, February.
    36. Simon Hussain, 2011. "Food for Thought on the ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 545-559, June.
    37. Mats Alvesson & Jörgen Sandberg, 2013. "Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 128-152, January.
    38. Daniela Argento & Dorota Dobija & Giuseppe Grossi, 2020. "The disillusion of calculative practices in academia," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    39. Malsch, Bertrand & Tessier, Sophie, 2015. "Journal ranking effects on junior academics: Identity fragmentation and politicization," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 84-98.
    40. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2005. "Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 81-98, January.
    41. Eugenio Caperchione & Istemi Demirag & Giuseppe Grossi, 2017. "Public sector reforms and public private partnerships: Overview and research agenda," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 1-7, March.
    42. Gendron, Yves, 2015. "Accounting academia and the threat of the paying-off mentality," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 168-176.
    43. Claire-France Picard & Sylvain Durocher & Yves Gendron, 2019. "Desingularization and Dequalification: A Foray Into Ranking Production and Utilization Processes," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 737-765, August.
    44. Parker, Lee, 2011. "University corporatisation: Driving redefinition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 434-450.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brooks, Chris & Schopohl, Lisa & Walker, James T., 2023. "Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Palea, Vera, 2015. "Journal Rankings and the Sustainability of Diversity in Accounting Research," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201546, University of Turin.
    3. Gerdin, Jonas & Englund, Hans, 2022. "Vertical, horizontal, and self control in academia: Survey evidence on their diverging effects on perceived researcher autonomy and identity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    4. Gebreiter, Florian, 2022. "A profession in peril? University corporatization, performance measurement and the sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Palea, Vera, 2017. "Whither accounting research? A European view," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 59-73.
    6. Gendron, Yves & Rodrigue, Michelle, 2021. "On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Endenich, Christoph & Trapp, Rouven, 2018. "Signaling effects of scholarly profiles – The editorial teams of North American accounting association journals," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 4-23.
    8. Tobias Johansson, 2022. "Do Evaluative Pressures and Group Identification Cultivate Competitive Orientations and Cynical Attitudes Among Academics?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 761-780, April.
    9. Humphrey, Christopher & Gendron, Yves, 2015. "What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 47-66.
    10. Nino Tandilashvili & Anna Tandilashvili, 2022. "Academics’ perception of identity (re)construction: a value conflict created by performance orientation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 389-416, June.
    11. Maran, Laura & Bigoni, Michele & Morrison, Leanne, 2023. "Shedding light on alternative interdisciplinary accounting research through journal editors’ perspectives and an analysis of recent publications," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Gendron, Yves & Andrew, Jane & Cooper, Christine, 2022. "The perils of artificial intelligence in academic publishing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Hussain, Simon & Liu, Lana Yan Jun & Miller, Anthony D., 2020. "Accounting as a dichotomised discipline: An analysis of the source materials used in the construction of accounting articles," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Grisard, Claudine, 2023. "Time, workload model and the entrepreneurial construction of the neoliberal academic," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    15. Tucker, Basil P. & Tilt, Carol A., 2019. "‘You know it when you see it’: In search of ‘the ideal’ research culture in university accounting faculties," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Dixon, Keith, 2013. "Growth and dispersion of accounting research about New Zealand before and during a National Research Assessment Exercise: Five decades of academic journals bibliometrics," MPRA Paper 51100, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Pelger, Christoph & Grottke, Markus, 2015. "What about the future of the academy? – Some remarks on the looming colonisation of doctoral education," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 117-129.
    18. Pimentel, Erica & Cho, Charles & Bothello, Joel, 2022. "The blind spots of interdisciplinarity in addressing grand challenges," MPRA Paper 114562, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Bamber, Matthew & Tekathen, Matthäus, 2023. "Beyond the pages of the ‘how-to’ textbook: A study of the lived experiences of the accounting ethnographer," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Becker, Albrecht & Lukka, Kari, 2023. "Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:crpeac:v:96:y:2023:i:c:s1045235422001228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/critical-perspectives-on-accounting/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.