IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v195y2025ics0960077925003078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utility of decisions and beliefs based on bounded-confidence opinion dynamics with group conformity

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Kun
  • Zhang, Hongfeng

Abstract

Political parties, groups and organizations deliberately manipulate the direction of public opinion on social media, causing the evolution of group opinions to become increasingly complex driven by the information fusion mechanisms and artificial intelligence technologies. In this context, we propose a dynamic, heterogeneous bounded social model that integrates external group conformity and internal individual attributes, which simulates the role of individual decision-making abilities and beliefs in the evolution of opinions under different conformity scenarios. In this model, we introduce a network formation game process to simulate how users make judgments under the influence of external conformity, which arises from the complex mechanisms generated by numerous informational factors acting on the group. We find that improving the decision-making abilities and beliefs can reduce the chaos in opinion evolution. In the scenario of informational conformity, the high degree of individual beliefs can suppress opinion fragmentation. Moreover, when the proportion of normative conformity increases, the enhancement of decision-making can further reduce the chaos in communication. Thus, we reveal the pathways that guide the trends of opinion evolution in social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Kun & Zhang, Hongfeng, 2025. "Utility of decisions and beliefs based on bounded-confidence opinion dynamics with group conformity," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0960077925003078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077925003078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0960077925003078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.