IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/chsofr/v141y2020ics096007792030761x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A hybrid prediction method based on empirical mode decomposition and multiple model fusion for chaotic time series

Author

Listed:
  • Tang, Li-Hong
  • Bai, Yu-Long
  • Yang, Jie
  • Lu, Ya-Ni

Abstract

Chaotic time series exist in nature, such as in the field of meteorology or physics, with unpredictable features caused by their inherent high complexity and nonstationary motion. To improve the prediction effect of chaotic time series, a hybrid prediction method on the basis of the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and neural networks (NN) is proposed. First, the original chaotic time series is decomposed into several intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and one residual by EMD, whose components are divided into high, medium and low components by using the runs test. The high IMFs change dramatically, and the correlation among data is not high; therefore, we use the fuzzy first-order transition rules trained neural network (NN-FFOTR) model to predict the high frequency components. Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models are applied according to the random characteristic exhibited by the medium frequency IMFs and residual. Finally, the prediction results of the two models are adaptively superimposed together to obtain the final prediction results. The proposed hybrid method is named EMD-ARIMA-NN-FFOTR for simplicity. The simulation results are verified through two typical chaotic time series including the Lorenz-63 system and Mackey-Glass time series. For the x-axis of the Lorenz-63 system, the experimental results indicates that the symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE) of the ARIMA, NN-FFOTR, ARIMA-NN-FFOTR and EMD-ARIMA-NN-FFOTR are 1.0657, 1.5281, 1.0657 and 0.0041;the root mean square error (RMSE) are 2.2591,0.6830,0.4231 and 0.0012; the mean absolute error (MAE) are 50.5149,15.2130,9.4610 and 0.0019; the sum of error squares (SSE) are 101.4,96.32,65.8300 and 21.6351; and the Theil inequality coefficient are 0.0674, 0.0741, 0.0213 and 0.0162, the proposed model's TIC are much lower than those of the comparison models. The values of the R square of the developed prediction approach utilizing ARIMA, NN-FFPTR, ARIMA-NN-FFOTR and EMD-ARIMA-NN-FFOTR method are 0.9674,0.9741, 0.9799 and 0.9963, and the index of agreement are 0.8992,0.9921,0.9845 and 0.9991, the value of the R-square and the index of agreement of the proposed model's are much higher than those of the comparison models. The Pearson's test results show that the association strength between the actual value and the predicted values of the proposed model is stronger. These results show the following: (a) compared with other related, recent studies, the prediction accuracy of the hybrid system EMD-ARIMA-NN-FFOTR proposed in this article is higher; (b) the proposed hybrid system attains superior performance compared with single models; and (c) the proposed hybrid system balances the forecast accuracy and convergence speed simultaneously during prediction. Therefore, it is feasible to apply the hybrid model to the prediction of chaotic time series.

Suggested Citation

  • Tang, Li-Hong & Bai, Yu-Long & Yang, Jie & Lu, Ya-Ni, 2020. "A hybrid prediction method based on empirical mode decomposition and multiple model fusion for chaotic time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:141:y:2020:i:c:s096007792030761x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792030761X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yulong Bai & Lihong Tang & Manhong Fan & Xiaoyan Ma & Yang Yang, 2020. "Fuzzy First-Order Transition-Rules-Trained Hybrid Forecasting System for Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Liu, Hui & Chen, Chao & Tian, Hong-qi & Li, Yan-fei, 2012. "A hybrid model for wind speed prediction using empirical mode decomposition and artificial neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 545-556.
    3. Tian, Zhongda, 2020. "Chaotic characteristic analysis of network traffic time series at different time scales," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Lin & Bai, Yulong & Liu, Ming-De & Fan, Man-Hong & Yang, Jie, 2022. "Predicting short wind speed with a hybrid model based on a piecewise error correction method and Elman neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Zhu, Ting & Wang, Wenbo & Yu, Min, 2022. "A novel blood glucose time series prediction framework based on a novel signal decomposition method," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. Wang, Siyi & Chen, Yongqiang & Mei, Ying & He, Wenping, 2023. "The robustness of driving force signals extracted by slow feature analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. Zhang, Yagang & Zhang, Jinghui & Yu, Leyi & Pan, Zhiya & Feng, Changyou & Sun, Yiqian & Wang, Fei, 2022. "A short-term wind energy hybrid optimal prediction system with denoising and novel error correction technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dhanya Jothimani & Ravi Shankar & Surendra S. Yadav, 2016. "Discrete Wavelet Transform-Based Prediction of Stock Index: A Study on National Stock Exchange Fifty Index," Papers 1605.07278, arXiv.org.
    2. Wang, Jianzhou & Xiong, Shenghua, 2014. "A hybrid forecasting model based on outlier detection and fuzzy time series – A case study on Hainan wind farm of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 526-541.
    3. Méndez-Gordillo, Alma Rosa & Cadenas, Erasmo, 2021. "Wind speed forecasting by the extraction of the multifractal patterns of time series through the multiplicative cascade technique," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Dongxiao Niu & Yi Liang & Wei-Chiang Hong, 2017. "Wind Speed Forecasting Based on EMD and GRNN Optimized by FOA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Ata, Rasit, 2015. "Artificial neural networks applications in wind energy systems: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 534-562.
    6. Noemi Nava & Tiziana Di Matteo & Tomaso Aste, 2018. "Financial Time Series Forecasting Using Empirical Mode Decomposition and Support Vector Regression," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Erasmo Cadenas & Wilfrido Rivera & Rafael Campos-Amezcua & Christopher Heard, 2016. "Wind Speed Prediction Using a Univariate ARIMA Model and a Multivariate NARX Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Bokde, Neeraj Dhanraj & Tranberg, Bo & Andresen, Gorm Bruun, 2021. "Short-term CO2 emissions forecasting based on decomposition approaches and its impact on electricity market scheduling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Pei Du & Yu Jin & Kequan Zhang, 2016. "A Hybrid Multi-Step Rolling Forecasting Model Based on SSA and Simulated Annealing—Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization for Wind Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Wang, Jianzhou & Qin, Shanshan & Zhou, Qingping & Jiang, Haiyan, 2015. "Medium-term wind speeds forecasting utilizing hybrid models for three different sites in Xinjiang, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 91-101.
    11. Nava, Noemi & Di Matteo, Tiziana & Aste, Tomaso, 2018. "Financial time series forecasting using empirical mode decomposition and support vector regression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 91028, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Liu, Hui & Tian, Hongqi & Liang, Xifeng & Li, Yanfei, 2015. "New wind speed forecasting approaches using fast ensemble empirical model decomposition, genetic algorithm, Mind Evolutionary Algorithm and Artificial Neural Networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1066-1075.
    13. Yulong Bai & Lihong Tang & Manhong Fan & Xiaoyan Ma & Yang Yang, 2020. "Fuzzy First-Order Transition-Rules-Trained Hybrid Forecasting System for Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Luis Lopez & Ingrid Oliveros & Luis Torres & Lacides Ripoll & Jose Soto & Giovanny Salazar & Santiago Cantillo, 2020. "Prediction of Wind Speed Using Hybrid Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Yu, Min & Niu, Dongxiao & Gao, Tian & Wang, Keke & Sun, Lijie & Li, Mingyu & Xu, Xiaomin, 2023. "A novel framework for ultra-short-term interval wind power prediction based on RF-WOA-VMD and BiGRU optimized by the attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    16. Athraa Ali Kadhem & Noor Izzri Abdul Wahab & Ishak Aris & Jasronita Jasni & Ahmed N. Abdalla, 2017. "Advanced Wind Speed Prediction Model Based on a Combination of Weibull Distribution and an Artificial Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Zhang, Chi & Wei, Haikun & Zhao, Junsheng & Liu, Tianhong & Zhu, Tingting & Zhang, Kanjian, 2016. "Short-term wind speed forecasting using empirical mode decomposition and feature selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 727-737.
    18. Alma Y. Alanis & Oscar D. Sanchez & Jesus G. Alvarez, 2021. "Time Series Forecasting for Wind Energy Systems Based on High Order Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Wang, Jianzhou & Hu, Jianming & Ma, Kailiang & Zhang, Yixin, 2015. "A self-adaptive hybrid approach for wind speed forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 374-385.
    20. Tugce Demirdelen & Pırıl Tekin & Inayet Ozge Aksu & Firat Ekinci, 2019. "The Prediction Model of Characteristics for Wind Turbines Based on Meteorological Properties Using Neural Network Swarm Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:141:y:2020:i:c:s096007792030761x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thayer, Thomas R. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/chaos-solitons-and-fractals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.