Author
Listed:
- Lin, Gaoyi
- Ma, Liuding
- Liao, Hui
- Li, Jingying
Abstract
Using data from the National Taxation Survey from 2009 to 2015, this paper conducts a quasi-natural experiment on the tax reduction reform of "replacing business tax with value-added tax" (RBTVT) in China to empirically explore the impact of the fiscal pressure caused by the turnover tax reduction on the corporate income tax burden. The paper tries to explain why it is difficult to reduce the tax burden through tax reduction from the perspective of fiscal pressure. According to the empirical results, an extensive tax reduction creates a "tax substitution" effect, i.e., the stronger the tax reduction effect of the RBTVT, the greater the motivation of local governments will be to shift the fiscal pressure to enterprises through taxation, resulting in an increased local corporate income tax burden. In regards to "who pays the tax", the paper indicates that non-state-owned enterprises, small and micro enterprises, and non-RBTVT enterprises are the main bearers of the local fiscal pressure shift. With further examination, the paper finds that there is an obvious "tax substitution" effect in regions with poor business environments or large governments. In the mechanism section, the paper finds that strengthening tax administration, decreasing tax-rate reductions for enterprises, and levying excessive tax are the primary "tax substitution" methods. In the extended analysis, our results suggest that enterprises are not the ultimate bearers of fiscal pressure because they can shift the pressure on them to workers by reducing the cost of wages and benefits. Besides, the results show that cutting fiscal expenditure and improving fiscal expenditure efficiency can effectively alleviate the "tax substitution" effect. Finally, we find that the "tax substitution" effect discounts the impact of tax reduction, but does not entirely nullify it.
Suggested Citation
Lin, Gaoyi & Ma, Liuding & Liao, Hui & Li, Jingying, 2024.
"Nothing comes for free: Evidence from a tax reduction of China,"
China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:chieco:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x23001943
DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.102109
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:chieco:v:83:y:2024:i:c:s1043951x23001943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/chieco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.