IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i3p263-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation

Author

Listed:
  • Sitzmann, Traci
  • Schwartz, Shoshana

Abstract

While numerous management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high-performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diversifying managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles, formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are not consistently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.

Suggested Citation

  • Sitzmann, Traci & Schwartz, Shoshana, 2025. "Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 263-276.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:263-276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:263-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.