IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bushor/v68y2025i3p263-276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation

Author

Listed:
  • Sitzmann, Traci
  • Schwartz, Shoshana

Abstract

While numerous management practices have been implemented in organizations in recent decades to create equitable and high-performing workforces, there has been little to no progress toward diversifying managerial representation during this timeframe. Our review contrasts the effectiveness of management practices for increasing diverse representation in management with how often these practices are utilized in organizations, centrally implicating ineffective management practices for the slow pace of change in diversifying managerial ranks. Specifically, we unveil that organizations predominantly implement ineffective and counterproductive practices that undermine managerial diversity while infrequently implementing practices that increase managerial diversity. For example, paid diversity roles, formal mentoring programs, and DEI-focused recruitment are among the most effective practices but are not consistently implemented in organizations. In contrast, diversity and harassment training and grievance procedures are frequently utilized in organizations but are negatively related to diverse representation. We also provide examples of organizations implementing multiple effective practices and making meaningful progress toward diversifying their workforces.

Suggested Citation

  • Sitzmann, Traci & Schwartz, Shoshana, 2025. "Why is progress toward diverse representation so slow? Contrasting management practice prevalence versus effectiveness for achieving diverse representation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 263-276.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:263-276
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681324001782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Emanuel & Emma Harrington & Amanda Pallais, 2023. "The Power of Proximity to Coworkers: Training for Tomorrow or Productivity Today?," NBER Working Papers 31880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Southworth, Erica M., 2014. "Shedding gender stigmas: Work-life balance equity in the 21st century," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 97-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyue Shan & Ulf Zoelitz & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2025. "Disconnecting Women: Gender Disparities in the Impact of Online Instruction," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 2533, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin).
    2. Alessandra Fenizia & Tom Kirchmaier, 2024. "Not incentivized yet efficient: Working from home in the public sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp2036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Pablo Zarate & Mathias Dolls & Steven J. Davis & Nicholas Bloom & Jose Maria Barrero & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "Why Does Working from Home Vary across Countries and People?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11081, CESifo.
    4. David Van Dijcke & Florian Gunsilius & Austin Wright, 2024. "Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution," Papers 2405.04352, arXiv.org.
    5. Anna Kurowska & Agnieszka Kasperska, 2024. "Work from Home and Perceptions of Career Prospects of Employees with Children," Working Papers 2024-08, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    6. Berliant, Marcus & Fujita, Masahisa, 2023. "Knowledge Creation through Multimodal Communication," MPRA Paper 118318, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Burdett, Ashley & Etheridge, Ben & Tang, Li & Wang, Yikai, 2024. "Worker productivity during Covid-19 and adaptation to working from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    8. Ketter, Laura & Morris, Todd & Yu, Lizi, 2025. "A New Equilibrium: COVID-19 Lockdowns and WFH Persistence," IZA Discussion Papers 17975, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Nicholas Bloom & Gordon B. Dahl & Dan-Olof Rooth, 2024. "Work from Home and Disability Employment," NBER Working Papers 32943, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Guillaume M. A. Morlet & Thomas Bolli, 2024. "Working from home is here to stay, but how does it affect workplace learning?," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 160(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Kathryn Bonney & Cory L. Breaux & Cathy Buffington & Steven J. Davis & Lucia S. Foster & Brian McKenzie & Keith Savage & Cristina Tello-Trillo, 2025. "Tapping Business and Household Surveys to Sharpen Our View of Work from Home," NBER Working Papers 33951, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Marit Alstveit & Elisabeth Severinsson & Bjørg Karlsen, 2015. "Health Resources and Strategies among Employed Women in Norway during Pregnancy and Early Motherhood," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-8, April.
    13. Abou El-Komboz, Lena & Goldbeck, Moritz, 2024. "Virtually borderless? Cultural proximity and international collaboration of developers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    14. Xiaoyue Shan & Ulf Zölitz & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2025. "Disconnecting Women: Gender Disparities in the Impact of Online Instruction," CESifo Working Paper Series 11997, CESifo.
    15. Alipour Jean-Victor & Müller Marlene & Verkühlen Nadine, 2025. "Homeoffice: Zukunftsvision auf dem Weg zu mehr Gleichberechtigung?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(1), pages 59-63.
    16. Feuillade, Mylène & Goux, Dominique & Maurin, Eric, 2025. "Rise in Home Working and Spousal Labor Supply," IZA Discussion Papers 17997, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Carmit Moshe Rozental, 2019. "From The Handicap Principle To Brand Strategy €“ Are Gender Equality Practices And Csr Related?," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 24, pages 133-142, December.
    18. Lena Abou El-Komboz & Moritz Goldbeck, 2024. "International Collaboration in Digital Knowledge Work: A Production-Side Assessment of Europe’s Digital Single Market," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 25(06), pages 45-48, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bushor:v:68:y:2025:i:3:p:263-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bushor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.