IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2405.04352.html

Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • David Van Dijcke
  • Florian Gunsilius
  • Austin Wright

Abstract

With the official end of the COVID-19 pandemic, debates about the return to office have taken center stage among companies and employees. Despite their ubiquity, the economic implications of return to office policies are not fully understood. Using 260 million resumes matched to company data, we analyze the causal effects of such policies on employees' tenure and seniority levels at three of the largest US tech companies: Microsoft, SpaceX, and Apple. Our estimation procedure is nonparametric and captures the full heterogeneity of tenure and seniority of employees in a distributional synthetic controls framework. We estimate a reduction in counterfactual tenure that increases for employees with longer tenure. Similarly, we document a leftward shift in the seniority distribution towards positions below the senior level. These shifts appear to be driven by employees leaving to larger firms that are direct competitors. Our results suggest that return to office policies can lead to an outflow of senior employees, posing a potential threat to the productivity, innovation, and competitiveness of the wider firm.

Suggested Citation

  • David Van Dijcke & Florian Gunsilius & Austin Wright, 2024. "Return to Office and the Tenure Distribution," Papers 2405.04352, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.04352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.04352
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Emanuel & Emma Harrington & Amanda Pallais, 2023. "The Power of Proximity to Coworkers," NBER Working Papers 31880, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Robert D. Metcalfe & Alexandre B. Sollaci & Chad Syverson, 2023. "Managers and Productivity in Retail," NBER Working Papers 31192, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Jan Eeckhout & Philipp Kircher & Cristina Lafuente & Gabriele Macci, 2021. "Corrigendum to Capital Investment in “Assortative Matching With Large Firms”," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 11-14, July.
    4. Nicholas Bloom & James Liang & John Roberts & Zhichun Jenny Ying, 2015. "Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(1), pages 165-218.
    5. Nicholas Bloom & Ruobing Han & James Liang, 2022. "How Hybrid Working From Home Works Out," NBER Working Papers 30292, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Costi, Chiara & Clark, Andrew E. & D'Ambrosio, Conchita & Lepinteur, Anthony & Menta, Giorgia, 2024. "Return-to-Office Mandates, Health and Well-Being: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 17355, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Simon Cordes & Max Müller, 2026. "Do Firms Know What Workers Want?," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_739, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Florian F Gunsilius, 2025. "A primer on optimal transport for causal inference with observational data," Papers 2503.07811, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandra Fenizia & Tom Kirchmaier, 2024. "Not incentivized yet efficient: Working from home in the public sector," CEP Discussion Papers dp2036, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Pablo Zarate & Mathias Dolls & Steven J. Davis & Nicholas Bloom & Jose Maria Barrero & Cevat Giray Aksoy, 2024. "Why Does Working from Home Vary Across Countries and People?," NBER Working Papers 32374, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Vij, Akshay & Souza, Flavio F. & Barrie, Helen & Anilan, V. & Sarmiento, Sergio & Washington, Lynette, 2023. "Employee preferences for working from home in Australia," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 782-800.
    4. Markus Nagler & Johannes Rincke & Erwin Winkler, 2024. "Working from home, commuting, and gender," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Fang, Tony & Gunderson, Morley & Hartley, John & King, Graham & Ming, Hui, 2025. "Determinants and Effects of Remote Work Arrangements: Evidence from an Employer Survey," IZA Discussion Papers 18020, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2022. "Working from Home Around the World," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(2 (Fall)), pages 281-360.
    7. Michele Mariani & Livia Ristuccia & Pasqualino Montanaro, 2023. "Propensity to work remotely in the Bank of Italy: a behavioural analysis," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 753, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Anthony Macedo & João de Abreu e Silva & Patrícia C. Melo, 2026. "COVID-19, teleworking, and firms’ office-related decisions: an emerging literature," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Jannis Bischof & Joachim Gassen & Anna Rohlfing-Bastian & Davud Rostam-Afschar & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2024. "Accounting for Transparency: a Framework and Three Applications in Tax, Managerial, and Financial Accounting," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 573-611, December.
    10. Anna Kurowska & Agnieszka Kasperska, 2024. "Work from Home and Perceptions of Career Prospects of Employees with Children," Working Papers 2024-08, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    11. Nicholas Buchholz & Laura Doval & Jakub Kastl & Filip Matejka & Tobias Salz, 2025. "Personalized Pricing and the Value of Time: Evidence From Auctioned Cab Rides," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(3), pages 929-958, May.
    12. Uwe Jirjahn & Cinzia Rienzo, 2026. "Working From Home and Performance Pay: Individual or Collective Payment Schemes?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 39-51, March.
    13. Gaetano Basso & Davide Dottori & Sara Formai, 2025. "Working from home and labour productivity: firm-level evidence," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1508, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    14. Cristina Constantinescu & Arti Grover & Gaurav Nayyar, 2026. "Digitalization, Remote Work and Firm Resilience: Evidence From the COVID‐19 Shock," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 52-72, January.
    15. Burdett, Ashley & Etheridge, Ben & Tang, Li & Wang, Yikai, 2024. "Worker productivity during Covid-19 and adaptation to working from home," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Yoon, Chungeun, 2026. "The direction of innovation and work from home," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1).
    17. Ketter, Laura & Morris, Todd & Yu, Lizi, 2025. "A New Equilibrium: COVID-19 Lockdowns and WFH Persistence," IZA Discussion Papers 17975, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Abou El-Komboz, Lena & Goldbeck, Moritz, 2024. "Virtually borderless? Cultural proximity and international collaboration of developers," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    19. Laura Ketter & Todd Morris & Lizi Yu, 2025. "A new equilibrium: COVID-19 lockdowns and WFH persistence," Papers 2506.16671, arXiv.org.
    20. Choudhury, Prithwiraj & Khanna, Tarun & Makridis, Christos A. & Schirmann, Kyle, 2023. "Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128764, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2405.04352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.