IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v21y2013i1p66-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between electronic word-of-mouth motivations and message characteristics: The sender’s perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yap, Kenneth B.
  • Soetarto, Budi
  • Sweeney, Jillian C.

Abstract

This study investigates how particular motivations are associated with different eWOM message characteristics. This is examined from the sender’s perspective in both positive and negative eWOM contexts. Responses from a sample of 201 consumers who had posted an online message about a financial service in the last 12months were collected through an online survey. Results showed that cognitive and affective characteristics of messages were linked to different motivations to engage in eWOM, which further differed across positive and negative messages. Managers should encourage consumers to share more positive factual information and sort online reviews based on the subject matter, rather than just the positivity of a message.

Suggested Citation

  • Yap, Kenneth B. & Soetarto, Budi & Sweeney, Jillian C., 2013. "The relationship between electronic word-of-mouth motivations and message characteristics: The sender’s perspective," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 66-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:66-74
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144135821200064X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Patterson, Paul G. & Smith, Amy K. & Brady, Michael K., 2009. "Customer Rage Episodes: Emotions, Expressions and Behaviors," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 222-237.
    2. East, Robert & Hammond, Kathy & Lomax, Wendy, 2008. "Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 215-224.
    3. Kristine de Valck & Roberts V. Kozinets & Andrea C. Wojnicki & Sarah J.S. Wilner, 2010. "Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities," Post-Print hal-00458424, HAL.
    4. Gaby A. C. Schellekens & Peeter W. J. Verlegh & Ale Smidts, 2010. "Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 207-223, August.
    5. James C. Ward & Amy L. Ostrom, 2006. "Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Web Sites," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(2), pages 220-230, July.
    6. Uma R. Karmarkar & Zakary L. Tormala, 2010. "Believe Me, I Have No Idea What I'm Talking About: The Effects of Source Certainty on Consumer Involvement and Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(6), pages 1033-1049, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khalili Nasr, Arash & Doosti, Shabnam & Ghaderi Kangavari, Sadegh, 2016. "Investigating the Effect of the Perceived Value of Banking Services on the Key Indicators of Consumer Behavior," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 11(3), pages 267-281, July.
    2. Previte, Josephine & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah & Mulcahy, Rory & Hartel, Charmine, 2019. "The role of emotional value for reading and giving eWOM in altruistic services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 157-166.
    3. Koller, Monika & Floh, Arne & Zauner, Alexander & Rusch, Thomas, 2013. "Persuasibility and the self – Investigating heterogeneity among consumers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 94-104.
    4. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 0. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    5. Chul Woo Yoo, 2020. "An Exploration of the Role of Service Recovery in Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 719-734, June.
    6. Nahit Erdem KÖKER & Deniz MADEN & Özgür KÖSEOĞLU, 2019. "Tüketicilerin Sosyal Ağlarda Markalarla Bağ Kurması Elektronik Ağızdan Ağıza İletişimlerini Nasıl Etkiliyor?," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(2), pages 284-312, November.
    7. Elvira Ismagilova & Emma L. Slade & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 1203-1226, October.
    8. Casidy, Riza, 2014. "The role of perceived market orientation in the higher education sector," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 155-163.
    9. Wang, Yichuan & Yu, Chiahui, 2017. "Social interaction-based consumer decision-making model in social commerce: The role of word of mouth and observational learning," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 179-189.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haase, Janina & Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Labenz, Franziska, 2022. "Brand hate, rage, anger & co.: Exploring the relevance and characteristics of negative consumer emotions toward brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-16.
    2. White, Allyn & Breazeale, Michael & Collier, Joel E., 2012. "The Effects of Perceived Fairness on Customer Responses to Retailer SST Push Policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 250-261.
    3. Ku, Hsuan-Hsuan & Shang, Rong-An & Fu, Yi-Fan, 2021. "Social learning effects of complaint handling on social media: Self-construal as a moderator," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Marília Lara Marcondes Machado de Oliveira & Andres Rodriguez Veloso, 2015. "Dysfunctional Consumer Behavior: Proposition of a Measurement Scale," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 0(2), pages 24-49, August.
    5. Sebastian Schneider & Frank Huber, 2022. "You paid what!? Understanding price-related word-of-mouth and price perception among opinion leaders and innovators," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 64-80, February.
    6. Wang, Xia & Yu, Chunling & Wei, Yujie, 2012. "Social Media Peer Communication and Impacts on Purchase Intentions: A Consumer Socialization Framework," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 198-208.
    7. Weitzl, Wolfgang J. & Einwiller, Sabine A., 2020. "Profiling (un-)committed online complainants: Their characteristics and post-webcare reactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 740-753.
    8. Cowley, Elizabeth, 2014. "Consumers telling consumption stories: Word-of-mouth and retrospective evaluations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1522-1529.
    9. Raassens, N. & Haans, Hans, 2017. "NPS and online WOM investigating the relationship between customers’ promoter scores and eWOM behavior," Other publications TiSEM 931e7761-7c6e-40ee-8976-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Tuzovic, Sven & Simpson, Merlin C. & Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Finsterwalder, Jörg, 2014. "From ‘free’ to fee: Acceptability of airline ancillary fees and the effects on customer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 98-107.
    11. Fombelle, Paul W. & Voorhees, Clay M. & Jenkins, Mason R. & Sidaoui, Karim & Benoit, Sabine & Gruber, Thorsten & Gustafsson, Anders & Abosag, Ibrahim, 2020. "Customer deviance: A framework, prevention strategies, and opportunities for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 387-400.
    12. Yany Grégoire & Fateme Ghadami & Sandra Laporte & Sylvain Sénécal & Denis Larocque, 2018. "How can firms stop customer revenge? The effects of direct and indirect revenge on post-complaint responses," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1052-1071, November.
    13. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Gensler, Sonja & Völckner, Franziska & Liu-Thompkins, Yuping & Wiertz, Caroline, 2013. "Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 242-256.
    15. Yang, Chaofan & Sun, Yongqiang & Shen, Xiao-Liang, 2022. "Beyond anger: A neutralization perspective of customer revenge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 363-374.
    16. Passos, Gisèle, 2013. "La vengeance du consommateur insatisfait sur Internet et l'effet sur les attitudes des autres consommateurs," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/11827 edited by Le Nagard, Emmanuelle.
    17. van Laer, Tom & de Ruyter, Ko, 2010. "In stories we trust: How narrative apologies provide cover for competitive vulnerability after integrity-violating blog posts," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 164-174.
    18. Labrecque, Lauren I. & vor dem Esche, Jonas & Mathwick, Charla & Novak, Thomas P. & Hofacker, Charles F., 2013. "Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 257-269.
    19. Mansur Khamitov & Yany Grégoire & Anshu Suri, 2020. "A systematic review of brand transgression, service failure recovery and product-harm crisis: integration and guiding insights," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 519-542, May.
    20. Voorhees, Clay M. & Fombelle, Paul W. & Gregoire, Yany & Bone, Sterling & Gustafsson, Anders & Sousa, Rui & Walkowiak, Travis, 2017. "Service encounters, experiences and the customer journey: Defining the field and a call to expand our lens," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 269-280.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:66-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.