IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v406y2026ics0306261925020227.html

Optimization of electrolyte and cathode thickness for solid oxide electrolysis cells considering residual stresses and thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stresses

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Futai
  • Li, Hongkun
  • Liu, Weiqun
  • Zhu, Qiao

Abstract

Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) present a promising high-temperature electrochemical technology for efficient hydrogen production and play a critical role in sustainable energy storage. However, optimizing the electrode and electrolyte thicknesses remains challenging due to the competing effects among energy efficiency, current leakage, and mechanical reliability. This study develops an optimization framework coupled with security constraint models for residual stresses during manufacturing and stresses induced by thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling during operation, to determine the optimal cathode and electrolyte thicknesses for yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) SOECs under both constant and variable power input scenarios. The model integrates: (i) an electrochemical framework accounting for current leakage to predict energy efficiency, (ii) residual stress evaluation during manufacturing, and (iii) thermo–electro–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stress analysis during operation. Two complementary optimization algorithms, sequential quadratic programming (SQP) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), were employed to determine cathode and electrolyte thickness combinations that maximize energy efficiency while satisfying stress safety constraints. The results reveal that optimal electrolyte thicknesses lie in the range 9.04 μm to 22.65 μm for YSZ-Cell and between 70.69 μm to 96.96 μm for GDC-Cell under constant power input, with corresponding cathode thicknesses from 195.24 μm to 500.99 μm and 202.67 μm to 283.74 μm. Regional analyses under variable power input, reflecting differences in solar energy availability, demonstrate that the optimized electrolyte and cathode thicknesses significantly enhance both annual hydrogen production and overall energy efficiency. Specifically, compared with empirical baseline (electrolyte thickness δe,exp=50 μm, cathode thickness δc,exp=500 μm), the optimized configurations improve the maximum energy efficiency by up to 9.54 % for the YSZ cell and 19.20 % for the GDC cell. These findings quantitatively demonstrate that optimizing electrolyte and cathode thicknesses provides a more comprehensive perspective by balancing efficiency and structural safety, offering actionable design guidelines for region-specific renewable hydrogen production systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Futai & Li, Hongkun & Liu, Weiqun & Zhu, Qiao, 2026. "Optimization of electrolyte and cathode thickness for solid oxide electrolysis cells considering residual stresses and thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stresses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:406:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020227
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925020227
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:406:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.