IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v406y2026ics0306261925020227.html

Optimization of electrolyte and cathode thickness for solid oxide electrolysis cells considering residual stresses and thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stresses

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Futai
  • Li, Hongkun
  • Liu, Weiqun
  • Zhu, Qiao

Abstract

Solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) present a promising high-temperature electrochemical technology for efficient hydrogen production and play a critical role in sustainable energy storage. However, optimizing the electrode and electrolyte thicknesses remains challenging due to the competing effects among energy efficiency, current leakage, and mechanical reliability. This study develops an optimization framework coupled with security constraint models for residual stresses during manufacturing and stresses induced by thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling during operation, to determine the optimal cathode and electrolyte thicknesses for yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and gadolinium-doped ceria (GDC) SOECs under both constant and variable power input scenarios. The model integrates: (i) an electrochemical framework accounting for current leakage to predict energy efficiency, (ii) residual stress evaluation during manufacturing, and (iii) thermo–electro–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stress analysis during operation. Two complementary optimization algorithms, sequential quadratic programming (SQP) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), were employed to determine cathode and electrolyte thickness combinations that maximize energy efficiency while satisfying stress safety constraints. The results reveal that optimal electrolyte thicknesses lie in the range 9.04 μm to 22.65 μm for YSZ-Cell and between 70.69 μm to 96.96 μm for GDC-Cell under constant power input, with corresponding cathode thicknesses from 195.24 μm to 500.99 μm and 202.67 μm to 283.74 μm. Regional analyses under variable power input, reflecting differences in solar energy availability, demonstrate that the optimized electrolyte and cathode thicknesses significantly enhance both annual hydrogen production and overall energy efficiency. Specifically, compared with empirical baseline (electrolyte thickness δe,exp=50 μm, cathode thickness δc,exp=500 μm), the optimized configurations improve the maximum energy efficiency by up to 9.54 % for the YSZ cell and 19.20 % for the GDC cell. These findings quantitatively demonstrate that optimizing electrolyte and cathode thicknesses provides a more comprehensive perspective by balancing efficiency and structural safety, offering actionable design guidelines for region-specific renewable hydrogen production systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Futai & Li, Hongkun & Liu, Weiqun & Zhu, Qiao, 2026. "Optimization of electrolyte and cathode thickness for solid oxide electrolysis cells considering residual stresses and thermal–electrical–chemical–mechanical coupling-induced stresses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 406(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:406:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020227
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925020227
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xia, Zhiping & Zhao, Dongqi & Li, Yuanzheng & Deng, Zhonghua & Kupecki, Jakub & Fu, Xiaowei & Li, Xi, 2023. "Control-oriented dynamic process optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell system with the gas characteristic regarding oxygen electrode delamination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    2. Li, Zheng & Yu, Jie & Wang, Chen & Bello, Idris Temitope & Yu, Na & Chen, Xi & Zheng, Keqing & Han, Minfang & Ni, Meng, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells based on a deep neural network surrogate model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    3. Feng, ShengSen & Huang, WenTao & Huang, Zhe & Jian, Qifei, 2022. "Optimization of maximum power density output for proton exchange membrane fuel cell based on a data-driven surrogate model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Zhang, Fan & Wang, Bowen & Gong, Zhichao & Zhang, Xiyuan & Qin, Zhikun & Jiao, Kui, 2023. "Development of photovoltaic-electrolyzer-fuel cell system for hydrogen production and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    5. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Ni, Meng & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of combined Solid Oxide Electrolyzer and Fischer–Tropsch processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 682-690.
    6. Li, Zheng & Bello, Idris Temitope & Wang, Chen & Yu, Na & Chen, Xi & Zheng, Keqing & Ni, Meng, 2023. "Revealing interactions between the operating parameters of protonic ceramic electrolysis cell: A modelling study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    7. Fang, Xiurong & Lin, Zijing, 2018. "Numerical study on the mechanical stress and mechanical failure of planar solid oxide fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 63-68.
    8. Jalili, Mohammad & Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar & Chitsaz, Ata & Song, Jian & Markides, Christos N., 2023. "Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    9. Samavati, Mahrokh & Santarelli, Massimo & Martin, Andrew & Nemanova, Vera, 2017. "Thermodynamic and economy analysis of solid oxide electrolyser system for syngas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 37-49.
    10. Gómez, Sergio Yesid & Hotza, Dachamir, 2016. "Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 155-174.
    11. Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Banerjee, Aayan & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2022. "Benchmarking solid oxide electrolysis cell-stacks for industrial Power-to-Methane systems via hierarchical multi-scale modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    12. Chmielniak, Tadeusz & Remiorz, Leszek, 2020. "Entropy analysis of hydrogen production in electrolytic processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Hu, Kewei & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Huang, Danji & Zhong, Zhiyao & Yang, Xiaobo & Wang, Lei, 2022. "Comparative study of alkaline water electrolysis, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis and solid oxide electrolysis through multiphysics modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    14. Xiurong Fang & Jiang Zhu & Zijing Lin, 2018. "Effects of Electrode Composition and Thickness on the Mechanical Performance of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan & Wahid, Mazlan Abdul, 2016. "Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 850-866.
    16. Wang, Huaqing & Xie, Zhuoshi & Pu, Lei & Ren, Zhongrui & Zhang, Yaoyu & Tan, Zhongfu, 2022. "Energy management strategy of hybrid energy storage based on Pareto optimality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    17. AlZahrani, Abdullah A. & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2018. "Modeling and performance optimization of a solid oxide electrolysis system for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 471-485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Cutolo, Laura & Vicidomini, Maria, 2025. "Thermoeconomic Comparison of Alkaline, Solid Oxide and Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers for Power-to-Gas Applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Jalili, Mohammad & Ghazanfari Holagh, Shahriyar & Chitsaz, Ata & Song, Jian & Markides, Christos N., 2023. "Electrolyzer cell-methanation/Sabatier reactors integration for power-to-gas energy storage: Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    3. Zhou, Huairong & Cao, Abo & Meng, Wenliang & Wang, Dongliang & Li, Guixian & Yang, Siyu, 2024. "Process integration and analysis of coupling solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) and CO2 to methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    4. Tian, Weiyong & Zhang, Xiaohui & Zhou, Peng & Guo, Ruixue, 2025. "Review of energy management technologies for unmanned aerial vehicles powered by hydrogen fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    5. Hu, Jiang & Abed, Azher M. & Talib, Zunirah Mohd & Alghassab, Mohammed A. & Abdullaev, Sherzod & Ghandour, Raymond & Hamlaoui, Oumayma & Alhomayani, Fahad M. & Dutta, Ashit Kumar & Jastaneyah, Zuhair, 2025. "Technical, economic, and environmental study with ANN-based optimization of a biomass-powered versatile/sustainable polygeneration system with carbon capture/utilization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    6. Reznicek, Evan P. & Braun, Robert J., 2020. "Reversible solid oxide cell systems for integration with natural gas pipeline and carbon capture infrastructure for grid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Mahrokh Samavati & Andrew Martin & Massimo Santarelli & Vera Nemanova, 2018. "Synthetic Diesel Production as a Form of Renewable Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Pérez-Trujillo, Juan Pedro & Elizalde-Blancas, Francisco & McPhail, Stephen J. & Della Pietra, Massimiliano & Bosio, Barbara, 2020. "Preliminary theoretical and experimental analysis of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell operating in reversible mode," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    9. Mehran, Muhammad Taqi & Yu, Seong-Bin & Lee, Dong-Young & Hong, Jong-Eun & Lee, Seung-Bok & Park, Seok-Joo & Song, Rak-Hyun & Lim, Tak-Hyoung, 2018. "Production of syngas from H2O/CO2 by high-pressure coelectrolysis in tubular solid oxide cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 759-770.
    10. Quan, Dongrui & Xie, Haipeng & Li, Peixuan & Bie, Zhaohong, 2025. "Optimal operation of electric-hydrogen coupling micro-energy networks considering the self-heat-recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    11. Li, Peiyang & Chi, Yingtian & Lin, Jin & Mu, Shujun & Song, Yonghua, 2024. "Inhomogeneity influence on the maximum current density of an SOEC stack tower: A circuit-based perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    12. Qiu, Ruiming & Gu, Wenli & Wang, Junyao & Tian, Zhipeng & Liu, Jianping & Wang, Chao & Liang, Bo & Huang, Jin & Lei, Libin, 2026. "Comprehensively assessing the effect of gas humidification on proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells via theoretical modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    13. Zhang, Biao & Harun, Nor Farida & Zhou, Nana & Oryshchyn, Danylo & Colon-Rodriguez, Jose J. & Shadle, Lawrence & Bayham, Samuel & Tucker, David, 2025. "A real-time distributed solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) model for cyber-physical simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    14. Furst, Oscar & Wehrle, Lukas & Schmider, Daniel & Dailly, Julian & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2024. "Modeling, optimization and comparative assessment of power-to-methane and carbon capture technologies for renewable fuel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    15. Guo, Meiting & Ru, Xiao & Yang, Lin & Ni, Meng & Lin, Zijing, 2022. "Effects of methane steam reforming on the mechanical stability of solid oxide fuel cell stack," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    16. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    17. Razmi, Amir Reza & Hanifi, Amir Reza & Shahbakhti, Mahdi, 2023. "Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Ma, Yixiang & Yu, Lean & Zhang, Guoxing & Lu, Zhiming & Wu, Jiaqian, 2023. "Source-load uncertainty-based multi-objective multi-energy complementary optimal scheduling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    19. Mamo Abawalo & Krzysztof Pikoń & Marcin Landrat & Waldemar Ścierski, 2025. "Hydrogen Production from Biowaste: A Systematic Review of Conversion Technologies, Environmental Impacts, and Future Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-42, August.
    20. Lucey, Brian & Yahya, Muhammad & Khoja, Layla & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Ahmed, Ali, 2024. "Interconnectedness and risk profile of hydrogen against major asset classes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:406:y:2026:i:c:s0306261925020227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.