IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v400y2025ics0306261925012954.html

Evaluating the feasibility of modular nuclear reactors in the European Union: A GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach to meet Paris Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Goushis, Rahul

Abstract

To meet the 2015 Paris Agreement’s targets, the EU aims to decommission all coal-fired power plants by 2030. Considering the Russian war in Ukraine, which has significantly inflated energy prices, the EU faces additional challenges with energy supply, exacerbated by dependence on the Nord Stream gas pipeline. This research focuses on identifying the 193-operating coal-fired plants in the EU and evaluating their potential for converting to small modular reactors (SMRs). Using ArcGIS software for data collection and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) analysis for ranking, this study ranks the existing coal plant locations based on criteria suitable for SMR construction. The findings suggest constructing SMRs at the top 70 ranked sites can generate four times the electricity produced by all 193 coal plants combined. Germany and Bulgaria are identified as ideal locations for SMRs. The research highlights SMRs as a superior solution to meet Europe’s increasing energy needs and climate goals, particularly in the absence of technological advancements in other renewable energy sources. This study emphasises that converting existing coal plants to SMRs could help the EU achieve its climate targets while addressing energy security concerns heightened by the ongoing geopolitical crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Goushis, Rahul, 2025. "Evaluating the feasibility of modular nuclear reactors in the European Union: A GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach to meet Paris Agreement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 400(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012954
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925012954
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hartog, J. A. & Hinloopen, E. & Nijkamp, P., 1989. "A sensitivity analysis of multicriteria choice-methods : An application on the basis of the optimal site selection for a nuclear power plant," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 293-300, October.
    2. Erol, İsmail & Sencer, Safiye & Özmen, Aslı & Searcy, Cory, 2014. "Fuzzy MCDM framework for locating a nuclear power plant in Turkey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 186-197.
    3. Uji, Azusa & Prakash, Aseem & Song, Jaehyun, 2021. "Does the “NIMBY syndrome” undermine public support for nuclear power in Japan?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammed Benli, 2025. "Global dimensions of human freedom: a two-decade analysis using fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 5681-5707, December.
    2. Yunna Wu & Meng Yang & Haobo Zhang & Kaifeng Chen & Yang Wang, 2016. "Optimal Site Selection of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Based on a Cloud Model and the PROMETHEE Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Nie, Rong & Song, Jinbo & Carneiro, Juliana, 2024. "Does emissions data disclosure of Waste-to-Energy incineration plants mitigate NIMBYism concerns? Evidence from the housing market," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1527, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    4. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    5. Yunna Wu & Chao Xie & Chuanbo Xu & Fang Li, 2017. "A Decision Framework for Electric Vehicle Charging Station Site Selection for Residential Communities under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment: A Case of Beijing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Ali Utku Akar & Mevlut Uyan & Sukran Yalpir, 2024. "Spatial evaluation of the nuclear power plant installation based on energy demand for sustainable energy policy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 8607-8642, April.
    7. Fausto Cavallaro & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Saulius Raslanas, 2016. "Evaluation of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems Using Fuzzy Shannon Entropy and Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Georgopoulou, E. & Sarafidis, Y. & Diakoulaki, D., 1998. "Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 483-500, September.
    9. Hsueh, Sung-Lin, 2015. "Assessing the effectiveness of community-promoted environmental protection policy by using a Delphi-fuzzy method: A case study on solar power and plain afforestation in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1286-1295.
    10. Zhao, Chengwei & Xu, Xuanhua & Liu, Ruihuan & He, Jishan, 2021. "A multi-aspect coordination HDRED site selection framework under multi-type heterogeneous environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 833-848.
    11. Xiaojun Sun & Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Fabrizio Battisti & Anthea Chiovitti, 2018. "A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Strager, Michael P. & Rosenberger, Randall S., 2006. "Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 627-639, June.
    14. Yasmina Bouzarour-Amokrane & Ayeley Tchangani & François Pérès, 2015. "Decision evaluation process in end-of-life systems management," Post-Print hal-01308899, HAL.
    15. Zhang, Mingming & Pang, Zhichao & Liu, Liyun & Yang, Zikun & Zhou, Dequn, 2024. "Risk assessment of China's overseas energy investments considering the response ability to major risk events: A case study of COVID-19," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    16. Heng-ming Peng & Xiao-kang Wang & Tie-li Wang & Ya-hua Liu & Jian-qiang Wang, 2020. "A Multi-Criteria Decision Support Framework for Inland Nuclear Power Plant Site Selection under Z-Information: A Case Study in Hunan Province of China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Strager, Michael P. & Rosenberger, Randall S., 2006. "Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 79-92, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:400:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925012954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.