IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v382y2025ics0306261924026102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-time period operation analysis of coupled transportation and power distribution networks considering self-driving and human-driving behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Zhe
  • Wang, Han
  • Xu, Xiaoyuan
  • Song, Guanyu
  • Yan, Zheng
  • Chen, Yue

Abstract

The rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs) prompts the interaction between transportation networks (TNs) and power distribution networks (PDNs). Meanwhile, the self-driving technology make the interaction process more intelligent. Thus, the human-driving and self-driving behaviors would coexist in a long time and simultaneously influence the operation of the coupled transportation-power distribution networks (TPNs). To depict the TPN operation states, this paper proposes a multi-time period traffic-power flow analysis method, in which a centralized mode and a decentralized mode are established to represent the impacts of self-driving and human-driving behaviors, respectively. For the centralized mode, an upper-level model is built to realize the social optimum of TPNs considering the travel cost of self-driving EVs and the operation cost of PDNs. For the decentralized mode, a lower-level model under stochastic user equilibrium (SUE) principle is proposed to derive the TPN operation state considering the cognitive biases of drivers. The traffic flows and electricity prices are transferred between the two models and then a bi-level traffic-power flow analysis model is formed. A semi-dynamic traffic assignment method is adopted in the bi-level model to depict the dynamic characteristics of TPNs in multiple time periods. Then, an adaptive iterative algorithm is proposed to solve the bi-level model and derive the multi-time period traffic-power flows. Finally, a practical TPN in Shanghai, China is used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model and the impacts of various parameters on the TPN operation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Zhe & Wang, Han & Xu, Xiaoyuan & Song, Guanyu & Yan, Zheng & Chen, Yue, 2025. "Multi-time period operation analysis of coupled transportation and power distribution networks considering self-driving and human-driving behaviors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924026102
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924026102
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.125226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisk, Caroline, 1980. "Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 243-255, September.
    2. Sheng, Yujie & Guo, Qinglai & Chen, Feng & Xu, Luo & Zhang, Yang, 2021. "Coordinated pricing of coupled urban Power-Traffic Networks: The value of information sharing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Gentile, 2018. "New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1531-1547, December.
    2. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    3. Kurmankhojayev, Daniyar & Li, Guoyuan & Chen, Anthony, 2024. "Link criticality index: Refinement, framework extension, and a case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    5. Melo, Emerson, 2014. "Price competition, free entry, and welfare in congested markets," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 53-72.
    6. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 686-703.
    7. Maher, Mike, 1998. "Algorithms for logit-based stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 539-549, November.
    8. Yu Nie & H. Zhang, 2010. "A Relaxation Approach for Estimating Origin–Destination Trip Tables," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-172, March.
    9. Li, Zepeng & Wu, Qiuwei & Li, Hui & Nie, Chengkai & Tan, Jin, 2024. "Distributed low-carbon economic dispatch of integrated power and transportation system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PA).
    10. Castillo, Enrique & Menéndez, José María & Sánchez-Cambronero, Santos, 2008. "Predicting traffic flow using Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 482-509, June.
    11. Chen, Yuanyi & Hu, Simon & Zheng, Yanchong & Xie, Shiwei & Hu, Qinru & Yang, Qiang, 2024. "Coordinated expansion planning of coupled power and transportation networks considering dynamic network equilibrium," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    12. Du, Muqing & Tan, Heqing & Chen, Anthony, 2021. "A faster path-based algorithm with Barzilai-Borwein step size for solving stochastic traffic equilibrium models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 982-999.
    13. Bell, Michael G. H., 1995. "Stochastic user equilibrium assignment in networks with queues," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-137, April.
    14. Nakayama, Shoichiro & Chikaraishi, Makoto, 2015. "Unified closed-form expression of logit and weibit and its extension to a transportation network equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 672-685.
    15. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Dzubur, Nada, 2016. "Bi-objective bilevel optimization of distribution center locations considering user equilibria," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1-22.
    16. Hong, Sung-Pil & Kim, Kyung min & Byeon, Geunyeong & Min, Yun-Hong, 2017. "A method to directly derive taste heterogeneity of travellers’ route choice in public transport from observed routes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 41-52.
    17. Seungkyu Ryu, 2021. "Mode Choice Change under Environmental Constraints in the Combined Modal Split and Traffic Assignment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Hai Yang & Qiang Meng & Michael G. H. Bell, 2001. "Simultaneous Estimation of the Origin-Destination Matrices and Travel-Cost Coefficient for Congested Networks in a Stochastic User Equilibrium," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 107-123, May.
    19. Paul Koster & Erik T. Verhoef & Simon Shepherd & David Watling, 2014. "Probabilistic Choice and Congestion Pricing with Heterogeneous Travellers and Price-Sensitive Demand," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-078/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 13 Nov 2014.
    20. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0306261924026102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.