IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v365y2024ics0306261924006081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a defossilized building sector with field tests in the lab: Review, development, and evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Vering, Christian
  • Göbel, Stephan
  • Klebig, Tim
  • Will, Florian
  • Horst, Janik
  • Wüllhorst, Fabian
  • Nürenberg, Markus
  • Mehrfeld, Philipp
  • Müller, Dirk

Abstract

The transformation process in the building sector towards future city concepts requires changes in our society that aim for significant emission reduction until 2045. Currently, buildings in Germany are constructed and operated in such a way that no changes need to be made to them for decades. Therefore, any upcoming changes that do not achieve the climate goals must be avoided immediately. However, making the optimal decision for a change is complex due to (a) multi-domain (e.g., design and control), (b) multi-scale (e.g., single-family building and urban energy system), (c) multi-stakeholder (e.g., users and practice), and (d) long-term implications (up to decades). Conventional testing facilities and methods do not account for the integration of (a)-(d). Therefore, their technology readiness level is limited by 6. This paper introduces an approach that aims at (1) a multi-domain and multi-scale approach by applying process systems engineering to the building sector and that aims at (2) stakeholder integration already in the research process by applying the living lab approach. We combine the two methods, yielding a field test in the lab infrastructure pushing the technology readiness level to 7–8. In all, it consists of five test benches (Refrigerant Cycle Lab, FlexFass, RT-Lab, Raumklimalabor, and InFis). This work focuses on the Refrigerant Cycle Lab. Its concept is based on two further Hardware-in-the-Loop test benches which are extended by a safety system that ensures automated operation dedicated to heat pumps with flammable refrigerants. In two case studies, we show that field tests in the lab allow multi-domain and multi-scale testing. Both aspects support accelerating the transformation process towards a defossilized building sector. In the next step, the combination of test benches at different locations is promising to reduce the need to set up identical experiments at different locations. In the long term, the laboratory is designed to include external stakeholders to avoid time-consuming iterations and can, therefore, save resources, time, and money for our complex transformation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Vering, Christian & Göbel, Stephan & Klebig, Tim & Will, Florian & Horst, Janik & Wüllhorst, Fabian & Nürenberg, Markus & Mehrfeld, Philipp & Müller, Dirk, 2024. "Towards a defossilized building sector with field tests in the lab: Review, development, and evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924006081
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924006081
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:365:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924006081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.