IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v333y2023ics0306261922018098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal offering strategy for wind-storage systems under correlated wind production

Author

Listed:
  • Dirin, Sepehr
  • Rahimiyan, Morteza
  • Baringo, Luis

Abstract

This paper formulates the offering problem for a cluster of wind-storage systems in the day-ahead energy market using a risk-constrained stochastic programming approach that anticipates different operating conditions in the real-time energy market. Wind-storage systems can be jointly operated as a cluster so as to achieve higher profitability. However, a meaningful positive correlation among the production provided by wind farms located in the cluster results in a higher level of uncertainty that imposes additional risk. A key issue is how this correlation influences the operation of the cluster in the energy markets. In order to study this subject, this paper presents the uncertainties involved by means of a number of correlated scenarios including: (i) the correlated prices in the day-ahead and the real-time markets, and (ii) the correlated wind power production of multiple wind farms jointly generated using an innovative scenario generation methodology. The comparative statistical analysis validates the good accuracy of the method proposed in order to capture the spatio-temporal correlation among the wind farms. The results of a realistic case study are, moreover, compared with those obtained by considering that the scenarios are generated individually for each wind farm. Upon considering the latter, the variability of wind power production is underestimated, which has a negligible impact on the expected profit; however, the profit risk modeled using the conditional value-at-risk is significantly overestimated. The overestimation error particularly concerns a less risk-averse operator of the cluster in the case of low wind power production.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirin, Sepehr & Rahimiyan, Morteza & Baringo, Luis, 2023. "Optimal offering strategy for wind-storage systems under correlated wind production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:333:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922018098
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922018098
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, Chenghui & Wang, Yishen & Xu, Jian & Sun, Yuanzhang & Zhang, Baosen, 2018. "Efficient scenario generation of multiple renewable power plants considering spatial and temporal correlations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 348-357.
    2. Arjmand, Reza & Rahimiyan, Morteza, 2016. "Impact of spatio-temporal correlation of wind production on clearing outcomes of a competitive pool market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 216-227.
    3. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    4. Morales, J.M. & Mínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J., 2010. "A methodology to generate statistically dependent wind speed scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 843-855, March.
    5. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Schmuel S., 2013. "Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2500, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Xu, Xiao & Hu, Weihao & Cao, Di & Huang, Qi & Liu, Zhou & Liu, Wen & Chen, Zhe & Blaabjerg, Frede, 2020. "Scheduling of wind-battery hybrid system in the electricity market using distributionally robust optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 47-56.
    7. Pandžić, Hrvoje & Morales, Juan M. & Conejo, Antonio J. & Kuzle, Igor, 2013. "Offering model for a virtual power plant based on stochastic programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 282-292.
    8. Hosseini, Seyyed Ahmad & Toubeau, Jean-François & De Grève, Zacharie & Vallée, François, 2020. "An advanced day-ahead bidding strategy for wind power producers considering confidence level on the real-time reserve provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    9. Seok, Hyesung & Chen, Chen, 2019. "An intelligent wind power plant coalition formation model achieving balanced market penetration growth and profit increase," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1134-1142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hain, Martin & Kargus, Tobias & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "An electricity price modeling framework for renewable-dominant markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 66, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    2. Site Wang & Harsha Gangammanavar & Sandra Ekşioğlu & Scott J. Mason, 2020. "Statistical estimation of operating reserve requirements using rolling horizon stochastic optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 371-397, September.
    3. Krishna, Attoti Bharath & Abhyankar, Abhijit R., 2023. "Time-coupled day-ahead wind power scenario generation: A combined regular vine copula and variance reduction method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    6. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    7. Noori, Ehsan & Khazaei, Ehsan & Tavaro, Mehdi & Bardideh, Farhad, 2019. "Economically Operation of Power Utilities Base on MILP Approach," MPRA Paper 95910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    9. Abdul Rauf & Mahmoud Kassas & Muhammad Khalid, 2022. "Data-Driven Optimal Battery Storage Sizing for Grid-Connected Hybrid Distributed Generations Considering Solar and Wind Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Deng, Jingchuan & Li, Hongru & Hu, Jinxing & Liu, Zhenyu, 2021. "A new wind speed scenario generation method based on spatiotemporal dependency structure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1951-1962.
    11. Munoz, Francisco D. & Pumarino, Bruno J. & Salas, Ignacio A., 2017. "Aiming low and achieving it: A long-term analysis of a renewable policy in Chile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 304-314.
    12. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    13. De Vos, K. & Stevens, N. & Devolder, O. & Papavasiliou, A. & Hebb, B. & Matthys-Donnadieu, J., 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    14. Trine K. Boomsma, 2019. "Comments on: A comparative study of time aggregation techniques in relation to power capacity-expansion modeling," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 406-409, October.
    15. Majid Al-Gwaiz & Xiuli Chao & Owen Q. Wu, 2017. "Understanding How Generation Flexibility and Renewable Energy Affect Power Market Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 114-131, February.
    16. Varawala, Lamia & Dán, György & Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza & Baldick, Ross, 2023. "A generalised approach for efficient computation of look ahead security constrained optimal power flow," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 477-494.
    17. Johnson, Samuel C. & Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. & Mallapragada, Dharik S. & Deetjen, Thomas A. & Rhodes, Joshua D. & Webber, Michael E., 2019. "Evaluating rotational inertia as a component of grid reliability with high penetrations of variable renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 258-271.
    18. Li, Jinghua & Zhou, Jiasheng & Chen, Bo, 2020. "Review of wind power scenario generation methods for optimal operation of renewable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    19. Sun, Mingyang & Cremer, Jochen & Strbac, Goran, 2018. "A novel data-driven scenario generation framework for transmission expansion planning with high renewable energy penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 546-555.
    20. Domínguez, R. & Conejo, A.J. & Carrión, M., 2014. "Operation of a fully renewable electric energy system with CSP plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 417-430.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:333:y:2023:i:c:s0306261922018098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.