IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v177y2016icp260-270.html

Pool equilibria including strategic storage

Author

Listed:
  • Zou, Peng
  • Chen, Qixin
  • Xia, Qing
  • He, Guannan
  • Kang, Chongqing
  • Conejo, Antonio J.

Abstract

With a rapid increase in capacity, independently-invested energy storage systems (ESSs) might take up a significant share in the generation mix, and would be required to participate in the electricity market. Considering the arbitrage capability of ESSs, their behaviors would be remarkably different from those of conventional generators, impacting the market equilibrium. These impacts would vary with the type of ESSs and the generation mix. Therefore, this paper formulates a multi-period market equilibrium problem with equilibrium constraints (EPEC) to study the strategic behaviors of different types of ESSs and their impacts on the market outcomes, assuming that ESSs behave as price-makers. The EPEC model is established within a general framework, which considers the individual profit-maximization behaviors of different ESSs and generators, including thermal units, hydro units and renewable units. Interactions between different generators and the market operator are also represented. Finally, numerical studies based on a modified IEEE 57-node system with different wind generation curves are performed for illustration and validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zou, Peng & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & He, Guannan & Kang, Chongqing & Conejo, Antonio J., 2016. "Pool equilibria including strategic storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 260-270.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:260-270
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916307097
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jian Yao & Ilan Adler & Shmuel S. Oren, 2008. "Modeling and Computing Two-Settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 34-47, February.
    2. Holger Scheel & Stefan Scholtes, 2000. "Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 1-22, February.
    3. RUIZ, Carlos & CONEJO, Antonio J. & SMEERS, Yves, 2012. "Equilibria in an oligopolistic electricity pool with stepwise offer curves," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2395, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Varkani, Ali Karimi & Daraeepour, Ali & Monsef, Hassan, 2011. "A new self-scheduling strategy for integrated operation of wind and pumped-storage power plants in power markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5002-5012.
    5. Xinmin Hu & Daniel Ralph, 2007. "Using EPECs to Model Bilevel Games in Restructured Electricity Markets with Locational Prices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 809-827, October.
    6. McConnell, Dylan & Forcey, Tim & Sandiford, Mike, 2015. "Estimating the value of electricity storage in an energy-only wholesale market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 422-432.
    7. Nataf, Kalen & Bradley, Thomas H., 2016. "An economic comparison of battery energy storage to conventional energy efficiency technologies in Colorado manufacturing facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 133-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pfeifer, Antun & Feijoo, Felipe & Duić, Neven, 2023. "Fast energy transition as a best strategy for all? The nash equilibrium of long-term energy planning strategies in coupled power markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Huang, Qisheng & Xu, Yunjian & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2020. "Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. De Vivero-Serrano, Gustavo & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2019. "Implications of bid structures on the offering strategies of merchant energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Shahmohammadi, Ali & Sioshansi, Ramteen & Conejo, Antonio J. & Afsharnia, Saeed, 2018. "Market equilibria and interactions between strategic generation, wind, and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 876-892.
    5. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Yuanrong Wang & Vignesh Raja Swaminathan & Nikita P. Granger & Carlos Ros Perez & Christian Michler, 2023. "Domain-adapted Learning and Imitation: DRL for Power Arbitrage," Papers 2301.08360, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    7. Dimitriadis, Christos N. & Tsimopoulos, Evangelos G. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2022. "Strategic bidding of an energy storage agent in a joint energy and reserve market under stochastic generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    8. Choorikkat, Sreerag & Lee, Yu-Ching & Hsu, Hsin-Wei, 2025. "Model for subsidizing industry and power company through gray-electricity taxation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Melendez, Kevin A. & Matamala, Yolanda, 2025. "Adversarial attacks in demand-side electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PD).
    10. Fang, Xichen & Guo, Hongye & Zhang, Xian & Wang, Xuanyuan & Chen, Qixin, 2022. "An efficient and incentive-compatible market design for energy storage participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    11. Calvillo, C.F. & Sánchez-Miralles, A. & Villar, J. & Martín, F., 2016. "Optimal planning and operation of aggregated distributed energy resources with market participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 340-357.
    12. Aryani, Morteza & Ahmadian, Mohammad & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad-Kazem, 2020. "Designing a regulatory tool for coordinated investment in renewable and conventional generation capacities considering market equilibria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2019. "Electricity wholesale market equilibrium analysis integrating individual risk-averse features of generation companies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Chen Zhao & Jiaqi Sun & Ping He & Shaohua Zhang & Yuqi Ji, 2023. "Integrating Risk Preferences into Game Analysis of Price-Making Retailers in Power Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Kong, Xiangyu & Xiao, Jie & Wang, Chengshan & Cui, Kai & Jin, Qiang & Kong, Deqian, 2019. "Bi-level multi-time scale scheduling method based on bidding for multi-operator virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 178-189.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreani, R. & Júdice, J.J. & Martínez, J.M. & Martini, T., 2016. "Feasibility problems with complementarity constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 41-54.
    2. Aghamohammadloo, Hossein & Talaeizadeh, Valiollah & Shahanaghi, Kamran & Aghaei, Jamshid & Shayanfar, Heidarali & Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Catalão, João P.S., 2021. "Integrated Demand Response programs and energy hubs retail energy market modelling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Tsimopoulos, Evangelos G. & Georgiadis, Michael C., 2021. "Nash equilibria in electricity pool markets with large-scale wind power integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Huifu Xu & Dali Zhang, 2013. "Stochastic Nash equilibrium problems: sample average approximation and applications," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 597-645, July.
    5. Uday V. Shanbhag & Gerd Infanger & Peter W. Glynn, 2011. "A Complementarity Framework for Forward Contracting Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 810-834, August.
    6. Kasina, Saamrat & Hobbs, Benjamin F., 2020. "The value of cooperation in interregional transmission planning: A noncooperative equilibrium model approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 740-752.
    7. Tanaka, Makoto & Chen, Yihsu, 2012. "Market power in emissions trading: Strategically manipulating permit price through fringe firms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 203-211.
    8. Grimm, Veronika & Martin, Alexander & Schmidt, Martin & Weibelzahl, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2016. "Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 493-509.
    9. Huppmann, Daniel & Egerer, Jonas, 2015. "National-strategic investment in European power transmission capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 191-203.
    10. Grimm, Veronika & Grübel, Julia & Schewe, Lars & Schmidt, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2019. "Nonconvex equilibrium models for gas market analysis: Failure of standard techniques and alternative modeling approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1097-1108.
    11. Zafirakis, Dimitrios & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J. & Baiocchi, Giovanni & Daskalakis, Georgios, 2016. "The value of arbitrage for energy storage: Evidence from European electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 971-986.
    12. Feijoo, Felipe & Das, Tapas K., 2014. "Design of Pareto optimal CO2 cap-and-trade policies for deregulated electricity networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 371-383.
    13. Guo, Hongye & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & Kang, Chongqing, 2019. "Electricity wholesale market equilibrium analysis integrating individual risk-averse features of generation companies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Chen, Yang & Hu, Mengqi & Zhou, Zhi, 2017. "A data-driven analytical approach to enable optimal emerging technologies integration in the co-optimized electricity and ancillary service markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 613-626.
    15. Wei Wei & Yile Liang & Feng Liu & Shengwei Mei & Fang Tian, 2014. "Taxing Strategies for Carbon Emissions: A Bilevel Optimization Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Christos N. Dimitriadis & Evangelos G. Tsimopoulos & Michael C. Georgiadis, 2021. "A Review on the Complementarity Modelling in Competitive Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    17. Pär Holmberg & Andy Philpott, 2014. "Supply function equilibria in transportation networks," Working Papers EPRG 1401, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    18. Neetzow, Paul & Mendelevitch, Roman & Siddiqui, Sauleh, 2019. "Modeling coordination between renewables and grid: Policies to mitigate distribution grid constraints using residential PV-battery systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1017-1033.
    19. David P. Brown & Andrew Eckert, 2017. "Electricity market mergers with endogenous forward contracting," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 269-310, June.
    20. Grimm, Veronika & Martin, Alexander & Weibelzahl, Martin & Zöttl, Gregor, 2014. "Transmission and Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: The Effects of Market Splitting and Network Fee Regimes," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 460, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:260-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.