IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v307y2025ics0378377424005742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of various canopy resistance calculation methods in vineyard evapotranspiration simulation at daily scale in Northwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jingying
  • Chen, Dianyu
  • Hu, Xiaotao
  • Qiu, Lucheng
  • Wang, Shujian
  • Zhu, Xuanrong
  • Zhuo, La
  • Zhang, Dongyan
  • Wu, Linzhe
  • Zhang, Linlin

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET), as a key process in the water cycle and energy cycle, is closely related to the growth and yield of crops. As the basis of efficient irrigation decision, the accurate estimation of ET is critical for agricultural management measures. The Penman-Monteith (PM) model is widely used to estimate ET, for which the determination of canopy resistance (rc) is crucial. Variant formulas have been developed to calculate rc, making the selection of a module challenging. The suitability of methods of calculation of rc largely affects the simulation performance of ET. Here, the Jarvis (JA) model, the coupled surface resistance (CO) model, the Farias (FA) model, the Kelliher-Leuning (KL) model, the Katerji-Perrier (KP) model and the new coupling (N) model which considering interaction among different factors were used for rc calculation in a vineyard in Northwest China. The selected modules, with different theoretical basis, were embedded into the PM model for simulating the vineyard ET. By comparison of 5-year (2018–2022) measured daily ET with the Bowen ratio, a canopy resistance optimization method was developed. The model parameter optimization was based on the Bayesian method. The accuracy evaluation indicators included relative error (MRE, %), coefficient of determination (R2) and Wilmott consistency coefficient (D). The results showed that JA, CO and FA models exhibited varying degrees of overestimation of the vineyard ET; especially during the periods with low leaf area index (LAI ≤ 1.0 m2m−2), with MRE of up to 56.24 % (FA model). Then KL, KP and N models performed better overall, with error distribution curve peaks close to 0 at both low and high LAI periods. The error distribution curves symmetry of the last three models was not only better than the first three, but also had a narrower error distribution range. The KP model had the highest simulation accuracy, with the highest R2 and D (R2 = 0.83, D = 0.90 for the calibration period and R2=0.79, D=0.89 for the validation period), and the lowest MRE (21.72 % for calibration period and 19.81 % for validation period). It was therefore recommended to use the KP method to calculate rc in the simulation of vineyard ET in Northwest China. The results suggested that the selected method and degree of optimization rc had a significant impact on simulation ET model output. This is crucial for the development of efficient water-saving strategies for specific agricultural crops in specific soil and climatic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jingying & Chen, Dianyu & Hu, Xiaotao & Qiu, Lucheng & Wang, Shujian & Zhu, Xuanrong & Zhuo, La & Zhang, Dongyan & Wu, Linzhe & Zhang, Linlin, 2025. "Application of various canopy resistance calculation methods in vineyard evapotranspiration simulation at daily scale in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005742
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005742
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Sheng & Lian, Jinjiao & Peng, Yuzhong & Hu, Baoqing & Chen, Hongsong, 2019. "Generalized reference evapotranspiration models with limited climatic data based on random forest and gene expression programming in Guangxi, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 220-230.
    2. Xing, Liwen & Zhao, Lu & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Wu, Zongjun & Gong, Daozhi & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2023. "Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    3. Oguntunde, Philip G. & van de Giesen, Nick & Savenije, Hubert H.G., 2007. "Measurement and modelling of transpiration of a rain-fed citrus orchard under subhumid tropical conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 200-208, January.
    4. Kato, Tomomichi & Kimura, Reiji & Kamichika, Makio, 2004. "Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 173-191, March.
    5. Ortega-Farias, Samuel Orlando & Olioso, A. & Fuentes, S. & Valdes, H., 2006. "Latent heat flux over a furrow-irrigated tomato crop using Penman-Monteith equation with a variable surface canopy resistance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 421-432, April.
    6. Jaivime Evaristo & Scott Jasechko & Jeffrey J. McDonnell, 2015. "Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7567), pages 91-94, September.
    7. Chen, Dianyu & Hu, Xiaotao & Duan, Xingwu & Yang, Daxin & Wang, Youke & Wang, Xing & Saifullah, Muhammad, 2024. "Improving canopy transpiration model performance by considering concurrent hot and dry conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Wu, Lifeng & Zou, Yufeng & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Estimation of rainfed maize transpiration under various mulching methods using modified Jarvis-Stewart model and hybrid support vector machine model with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    9. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Jiang, Xuelian & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Li, Sien & Du, Taisheng, 2016. "Applying segmented Jarvis canopy resistance into Penman-Monteith model improves the accuracy of estimated evapotranspiration in maize for seed production with film-mulching in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 314-324.
    10. Srivastava, R.K. & Panda, R.K. & Chakraborty, A. & Halder, D., 2018. "Comparison of actual evapotranspiration of irrigated maize in a sub-humid region using four different canopy resistance based approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 156-165.
    11. Cui, Ningbo & He, Ziling & Jiang, Shouzheng & Wang, Mingjun & Yu, Xiuyun & Zhao, Lu & Qiu, Rangjian & Gong, Daozhi & Wang, Yaosheng & Feng, Yu, 2023. "Inter-comparison of the Penman-Monteith type model in modeling the evapotranspiration and its components in an orchard plantation of Southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    12. Yan, Haofang & Yu, Jianjun & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Ma, Jiamin, 2021. "Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Wu, Jie & Feng, Yu & Liang, Lili & He, Xinyue & Zeng, Zhenzhong, 2022. "Assessing evapotranspiration observed from ECOSTRESS using flux measurements in agroecosystems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Angus, D. E. & Watts, P. J., 1984. "Evapotranspiration -- How good is the Bowen ratio method?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(1-3), pages 133-150, January.
    15. Saadi, Sameh & Todorovic, Mladen & Tanasijevic, Lazar & Pereira, Luis S. & Pizzigalli, Claudia & Lionello, Piero, 2015. "Climate change and Mediterranean agriculture: Impacts on winter wheat and tomato crop evapotranspiration, irrigation requirements and yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 103-115.
    16. Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Zhao, Long & Wu, Zongjun & Jiang, Xuelian & Wen, Shenglin & Zhao, Lu & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating daily kiwifruit evapotranspiration under regulated deficit irrigation strategy using optimized surface resistance based model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    17. Athanasios Margonis & Georgia Papaioannou & Petros Kerkides & Gianna Kitsara & George Bourazanis, 2018. "Canopy Resistance and Actual Evapotranspiration over an Olive Orchard," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 5007-5026, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zongyang & Zhao, Lu & Zhao, Zhengxin & Cai, Huanjie & Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo, 2024. "Estimating the transpiration of kiwifruit using an optimized canopy resistance model based on the synthesis of sunlit and shaded leaves," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    2. Yan, Haofang & Yu, Jianjun & Zhang, Chuan & Wang, Guoqing & Huang, Song & Ma, Jiamin, 2021. "Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    3. Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Zhao, Long & Wu, Zongjun & Jiang, Xuelian & Wen, Shenglin & Zhao, Lu & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating daily kiwifruit evapotranspiration under regulated deficit irrigation strategy using optimized surface resistance based model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    4. Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Zhao, Lu & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Zhan, Cun & Wu, Zongjun & Wen, Shenglin & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2022. "Estimation of daily apple tree transpiration in the Loess Plateau region of China using deep learning models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    5. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Jiang, Xuelian & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Li, Sien & Du, Taisheng, 2016. "Applying segmented Jarvis canopy resistance into Penman-Monteith model improves the accuracy of estimated evapotranspiration in maize for seed production with film-mulching in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 314-324.
    6. Ortega-Farias, Samuel Orlando & Olioso, A. & Fuentes, S. & Valdes, H., 2006. "Latent heat flux over a furrow-irrigated tomato crop using Penman-Monteith equation with a variable surface canopy resistance," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 421-432, April.
    7. Dong, Juan & Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Zhao, Lu & Guo, Li & Wang, Zhihui & Du, Taisheng & Tan, Mingdong & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating reference crop evapotranspiration using improved convolutional bidirectional long short-term memory network by multi-head attention mechanism in the four climatic zones of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Xing, Liwen & Zhao, Lu & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Wu, Zongjun & Gong, Daozhi & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2023. "Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Wu, Lifeng & Zou, Yufeng & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Estimation of rainfed maize transpiration under various mulching methods using modified Jarvis-Stewart model and hybrid support vector machine model with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    10. Dong, Juan & Zhu, Yuanjun & Cui, Ningbo & Jia, Xiaoxu & Guo, Li & Qiu, Rangjian & Shao, Ming’an, 2024. "Estimating crop evapotranspiration of wheat-maize rotation system using hybrid convolutional bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory network with grey wolf algorithm in Chinese Loess Plateau region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    11. Cameira, Maria do Rosário & Rodrigo, Isabel & Garção, Andreia & Neves, Manuela & Ferreira, Antónia & Paredes, Paula, 2024. "Linking participatory approach and rapid appraisal methods to select potential innovations in collective irrigation systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    12. Jeetendra Prakash Aryal & Tek B. Sapkota & Ritika Khurana & Arun Khatri-Chhetri & Dil Bahadur Rahut & M. L. Jat, 2020. "Climate change and agriculture in South Asia: adaptation options in smallholder production systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 5045-5075, August.
    13. de Azevedo, Pedro V. & da Silva, Bernardo B. & da Silva, Vicente P. R., 2003. "Water requirements of irrigated mango orchards in northeast Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 241-254, February.
    14. Peter Addo Amarkai & Sinan Süheri, 2024. "Comparative Evaluation of Crop Evapotranspiration Estimation Methods in a Semi-Arid Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Tahiri, Adel Zeggaf & Anyoji, H. & Yasuda, H., 2006. "Fixed and variable light extinction coefficients for estimating plant transpiration and soil evaporation under irrigated maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(1-2), pages 186-192, July.
    16. Hamani, Abdoul Kader Mounkaila & Liu, Junming & Si, Zhuanyun & Kpalari, Djifa Fidele & Wang, Guangshuai & Gao, Yang & Ju, Xiaotang, 2024. "The relationship of δD and δ18O in soil water and its implications for soil evaporation across distinct rainfall years in winter wheat field in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    17. Tailin Li & Massimiliano Schiavo & David Zumr, . "Seasonal variations of vegetative indices and their correlation with evapotranspiration and soil water storage in a small agricultural catchment," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    18. Gao, Lei & Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Lu, Hongna, 2019. "Surface soil water content dominates the difference between ecosystem and canopy water use efficiency in a sparse vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Zhou, Hanmi & Ma, Linshuang & Niu, Xiaoli & Xiang, Youzhen & Chen, Jiageng & Su, Yumin & Li, Jichen & Lu, Sibo & Chen, Cheng & Wu, Qi, 2024. "A novel hybrid model combined with ensemble embedded feature selection method for estimating reference evapotranspiration in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    20. Li, Xianyue & Yang, Peiling & Ren, Shumei & Li, Yunkai & Liu, Honglu & Du, Jun & Li, Pingfeng & Wang, Caiyuan & Ren, Liang, 2010. "Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 12-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s0378377424005742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.