IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v276y2023ics0378377422006084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, Liwen
  • Zhao, Lu
  • Cui, Ningbo
  • Liu, Chunwei
  • Guo, Li
  • Du, Taisheng
  • Wu, Zongjun
  • Gong, Daozhi
  • Jiang, Shouzheng

Abstract

Accurate estimates of plant transpiration (Tsf) are essential to maximizing the efficient use of water. When only considering the surface canopy resistance (rc), the Penman-Monteith (PM) model is commonly used in Tsf modeling. However, the rc is difficult to measure but it can be accurately estimated using the Jarvis canopy resistance model (JA). Our objectives were to evaluate the rc of apple trees calculated with an inverted PM model integrated with different versions of the JA model for different growth stages and to compare their accuracy using four optimization algorithms, the least squares method (LSM), genetic algorithm (GA), quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO), and the mind evolutionary algorithm (MEA). We explored the effect of environmental constraint functions and parameter optimization of three environmental variables, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), net irradiance (Rn), and air temperature (Ta), and of soil water content (θa) on the accuracy of JA sub-models to calculate apple tree rc and Tsf. In our analysis, we used rainfed data from experiments on an apple orchard conducted during 2008–2010 at Wuwei City on the Loess Plateau of China. We compared 81 segmented JA sub-models (by canopy growth stage), comprising of the combination of the environmental constraint functions that were used to calculate rc. Moreover, the JA sub-models were optimized and results were compared to improve the accuracy of Tsf estimates with five empirical rc models, combined with the PM model. The results showed that sub-model JA3322, i.e., the third constraint for VPD, the third constraint for Rn, the second constraint for Ta, and the second constraint for θa attained the best estimate of rc with a coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.71), a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE = 0.65), root mean squared error (RMSE = 1257.4 s m-1), and global performance indicator (GPI = 1.0) for the whole growth stage. The equivalent values for the partial canopy stage were 0.78, 0.72, 1203.3 s m-1 and 0.99, and the values for the dense canopy stage were 0.78, 0.77, 445.6 s m-1 and 0.97, respectively. Segmented JA models based on the leaf area index threshold significantly improved the accuracy of rc estimation, where the median R2 and NSE were improved by 7.1 % and 12.4 % in the partial canopy stage and by 12.2 % and 13.4 % in the dense canopy stage. Despite pointing out the best environmental constraint functions of the JA model in the different growth stages, results indicated that the MEA yielded the most accurate estimates of rc, followed by QPSO, GA, and LSM. Moreover, the JA model with environmental constraints was the most accurate method to estimate the apple tree Tsf, and MEA was the most suitable parameter optimization algorithm. Overall, the findings of this study provide accurate actual water consumption information of apple trees using easily accessible meteorological data for the effective day-to-day water management decision-making of rain-fed apple tree orchards on the Loess Plateau of China previously.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, Liwen & Zhao, Lu & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Wu, Zongjun & Gong, Daozhi & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2023. "Apple tree transpiration estimated using the Penman-Monteith model integrated with optimized jarvis model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006084
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422006084
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Jiang, Xuelian & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Li, Sien & Du, Taisheng, 2016. "Applying segmented Jarvis canopy resistance into Penman-Monteith model improves the accuracy of estimated evapotranspiration in maize for seed production with film-mulching in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 314-324.
    2. Srivastava, R.K. & Panda, R.K. & Chakraborty, A. & Halder, D., 2018. "Comparison of actual evapotranspiration of irrigated maize in a sub-humid region using four different canopy resistance based approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 156-165.
    3. Chia, Min Yan & Huang, Yuk Feng & Koo, Chai Hoon, 2021. "Swarm-based optimization as stochastic training strategy for estimation of reference evapotranspiration using extreme learning machine," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Fu, Shuai & Sun, Lin & Luo, Yi, 2016. "Combining sap flow measurements and modelling to assess water needs in an oasis farmland shelterbelt of Populus simonii Carr in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 172-180.
    5. Bohaienko, Vsevolod & Gladky, Anatolij & Romashchenko, Mykhailo & Matiash, Tetiana, 2021. "Identification of fractional water transport model with ψ-Caputo derivatives using particle swarm optimization algorithm," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 390(C).
    6. Ahmadi, Farshad & Mehdizadeh, Saeid & Mohammadi, Babak & Pham, Quoc Bao & DOAN, Thi Ngoc Canh & Vo, Ngoc Duong, 2021. "Application of an artificial intelligence technique enhanced with intelligent water drops for monthly reference evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Liu, Chunwei & Du, Taisheng & Li, Fusheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling, 2012. "Trunk sap flow characteristics during two growth stages of apple tree and its relationships with affecting factors in an arid region of northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 193-202.
    9. Chen, Dianyu & Hsu, Kuolin & Duan, Xingwu & Wang, Youke & Wei, Xinguang & Muhammad, Saifullah, 2020. "Bayesian analysis of jujube canopy transpiration models: Does embedding the key environmental factor in Jarvis canopy resistance sub-model always associate with improving transpiration modeling?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Zhao, Lu & Guo, Li & Du, Taisheng & Zhan, Cun & Wu, Zongjun & Wen, Shenglin & Jiang, Shouzheng, 2022. "Estimation of daily apple tree transpiration in the Loess Plateau region of China using deep learning models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    2. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and water productivity of rainfed maize under contrasting mulching conditions in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    4. Su, Qiong & Singh, Vijay P. & Karthikeyan, Raghupathy, 2022. "Improved reference evapotranspiration methods for regional irrigation water demand estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    5. Roy, Dilip Kumar & Lal, Alvin & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Saha, Kowshik Kumar & Datta, Bithin, 2021. "Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Wu, Lifeng & Zou, Yufeng & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Estimation of rainfed maize transpiration under various mulching methods using modified Jarvis-Stewart model and hybrid support vector machine model with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    7. Gonçalo C. Rodrigues & Ricardo P. Braga, 2021. "Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration during the Irrigation Season Using Nine Temperature-Based Methods in a Hot-Summer Mediterranean Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Du, Shaoqing & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng, 2017. "Water use efficiency is improved by alternate partial root-zone irrigation of apple in arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 184-192.
    9. Panagiotis Christias & Ioannis N. Daliakopoulos & Thrassyvoulos Manios & Mariana Mocanu, 2020. "Comparison of Three Computational Approaches for Tree Crop Irrigation Decision Support," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    11. Althoff, Daniel & Filgueiras, Roberto & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva, 2019. "Impact of sum-of-hourly and daily timesteps in the computations of reference evapotranspiration across the Brazilian territory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    12. Chen, Dianyu & Wang, Youke & Liu, Shouyang & Wei, Xinguang & Wang, Xing, 2014. "Response of relative sap flow to meteorological factors under different soil moisture conditions in rainfed jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) plantations in semiarid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 23-33.
    13. Tianjiao, Feng & Dong, Wang & Ruoshui, Wang & Yixin, Wang & Zhiming, Xin & Fengmin, Luo & Yuan, Ma & Xing, Li & Huijie, Xiao & Caballero-Calvo, Andrés & Rodrigo-Comino, Jesús, 2022. "Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of environmental factors and ecosystem functions in farmland shelterbelt systems in desert oasis ecotones," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    14. Pozníková, Gabriela & Fischer, Milan & van Kesteren, Bram & Orság, Matěj & Hlavinka, Petr & Žalud, Zdeněk & Trnka, Miroslav, 2018. "Quantifying turbulent energy fluxes and evapotranspiration in agricultural field conditions: A comparison of micrometeorological methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 249-263.
    15. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Melton, F. & Johnson, L. & Mota, M. & Wang, T., 2021. "Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: Practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    16. Luis Santos Pereira, 2017. "Water, Agriculture and Food: Challenges and Issues," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 2985-2999, August.
    17. Laura Şmuleac & Ciprian Rujescu & Adrian Șmuleac & Florin Imbrea & Isidora Radulov & Dan Manea & Anișoara Ienciu & Tabita Adamov & Raul Pașcalău, 2020. "Impact of Climate Change in the Banat Plain, Western Romania, on the Accessibility of Water for Crop Production in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Bohaienko, V.O., 2021. "Accuracy and speed of splitting methods for three-dimensional space–time fractional diffusion equation with ψ-Caputo derivatives," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 226-240.
    19. Asmamaw, Desale Kidane & Janssens, Pieter & Dessie, Mekete & Tilahun, Seifu A. & Adgo, Enyew & Nyssen, Jan & Walraevens, Kristine & Assaye, Habtamu & Yenehun, Alemu & Nigate, Fenta & Cornelis, Wim M., 2023. "Effect of deficit irrigation and soil fertility management on wheat production and water productivity in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    20. Consoli, S. & Stagno, F. & Roccuzzo, G. & Cirelli, G.L. & Intrigliolo, F., 2014. "Sustainable management of limited water resources in a young orange orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 60-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:276:y:2023:i:c:s0378377422006084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.