IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v98y2010i1p12-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xianyue
  • Yang, Peiling
  • Ren, Shumei
  • Li, Yunkai
  • Liu, Honglu
  • Du, Jun
  • Li, Pingfeng
  • Wang, Caiyuan
  • Ren, Liang

Abstract

The partitioning of canopy transpiration (Ec) and soil evaporation (Es) is often important to estimate evapotranspiration for hydrologic, ecologic, forest, and agricultural applications. Although Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) model can estimate the partitioning of Ec and Es, some parameters due to the complicated model structure are not easily obtained. Therefore, this has limited the further development of SW model. In this study, an improved dual-source model (SSW) was proposed for ET estimation. This simpler model structure with less parameters than SW model can estimate Ec and Es, separately, and only requires conventional meteorological data. The estimations of Ec and Es for the observation period were consistent with the data measured from sap flow and micro-lysimeter, respectively, in a commercial cherry orchard in Beijing, China. Also daily ET estimated from the SSW, SW, and Penman-Monteith (PM) model were compared and analyzed. The results showed there was a small difference between SSW and SW model, but their accuracy were both higher than PM model's, and the root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.641, 0.613 and 0.955 mm/day, respectively. Sensitivity analysis for SSW model showed that the variation of ET was less than 2% when parameters varied in the range of ±20%. So, the SSW model is not only simple but also high accurate and stable, and it appears suitable to estimate cherry orchard ET.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xianyue & Yang, Peiling & Ren, Shumei & Li, Yunkai & Liu, Honglu & Du, Jun & Li, Pingfeng & Wang, Caiyuan & Ren, Liang, 2010. "Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 12-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:1:p:12-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00250-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kato, Tomomichi & Kimura, Reiji & Kamichika, Makio, 2004. "Estimation of evapotranspiration, transpiration ratio and water-use efficiency from a sparse canopy using a compartment model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 173-191, March.
    2. Utset, Angel & Farre, Imma & Martinez-Cob, Antonio & Cavero, Jose, 2004. "Comparing Penman-Monteith and Priestley-Taylor approaches as reference-evapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize water-use under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 205-219, May.
    3. Rousseaux, M. Cecilia & Figuerola, Patricia I. & Correa-Tedesco, Guillermo & Searles, Peter S., 2009. "Seasonal variations in sap flow and soil evaporation in an olive (Olea europaea L.) grove under two irrigation regimes in an arid region of Argentina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 1037-1044, June.
    4. Villalobos, F.J. & Testi, L. & Moreno-Perez, M.F., 2009. "Evaporation and canopy conductance of citrus orchards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 565-573, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bian, Jiang & Hu, Xiaolong & Shi, Liangsheng & Min, Leilei & Zhang, Yucui & Shen, Yanjun & Zhao, Fenghua & Zha, Yuanyuan & Lian, Xie & Huang, Jiesheng, 2024. "Evapotranspiration partitioning by integrating eddy covariance, micro-lysimeter and unmanned aerial vehicle observations: A case study in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    2. Liao, Renkuan & Wu, Wenyong & Hu, Yaqi & Huang, Qiannan & Yan, Hua, 2019. "Quantifying moisture availability in soil profiles of cherry orchards under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Xing, Liwen & Cui, Ningbo & Liu, Chunwei & Guo, Li & Zhao, Long & Wu, Zongjun & Jiang, Xuelian & Wen, Shenglin & Zhao, Lu & Gong, Daozhi, 2024. "Estimating daily kiwifruit evapotranspiration under regulated deficit irrigation strategy using optimized surface resistance based model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    4. Gong, Xuewen & Liu, Hao & Sun, Jingsheng & Gao, Yang & Zhang, Hao, 2019. "Comparison of Shuttleworth-Wallace model and dual crop coefficient method for estimating evapotranspiration of tomato cultivated in a solar greenhouse," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 141-153.
    5. Liao, Renkuan & Wu, Wenyong & Hu, Yaqi & Xu, Di & Huang, Qiannan & Wang, Shiyu, 2019. "Micro-irrigation strategies to improve water-use efficiency of cherry trees in Northern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 388-396.
    6. Measham, P.F. & Wilson, S.J. & Gracie, A.J. & Bound, S.A., 2014. "Tree water relations: Flow and fruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 59-67.
    7. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Rallo, G. & Paço, T.A. & Paredes, P. & Puig-Sirera, À. & Massai, R. & Provenzano, G. & Pereira, L.S., 2021. "Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    9. Chen, Han & Huang, Jinhui Jeanne & McBean, Edward, 2020. "Partitioning of daily evapotranspiration using a modified shuttleworth-wallace model, random Forest and support vector regression, for a cabbage farmland," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Wang, Hong & Wang, Chenbing & Zhao, Xiumei & Wang, Falin, 2015. "Mulching increases water-use efficiency of peach production on the rainfed semiarid Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 20-28.
    11. Mashabatu, Munashe & Ntshidi, Zanele & Dzikiti, Sebinasi & Jovanovic, Nebojsa & Dube, Timothy & Taylor, Nicky J., 2023. "Deriving crop coefficients for evergreen and deciduous fruit orchards in South Africa using the fraction of vegetation cover and tree height data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Tahiri, Adel Zeggaf & Anyoji, H. & Yasuda, H., 2006. "Fixed and variable light extinction coefficients for estimating plant transpiration and soil evaporation under irrigated maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(1-2), pages 186-192, July.
    3. Gao, Lei & Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Lu, Hongna, 2019. "Surface soil water content dominates the difference between ecosystem and canopy water use efficiency in a sparse vineyard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    4. Hlavinka, Petr & Trnka, Miroslav & Balek, Jan & Semerádová, Daniela & Hayes, Michael & Svoboda, Mark & Eitzinger, Josef & Mozný, Martin & Fischer, Milan & Hunt, Eric & Zalud, Zdenek, 2011. "Development and evaluation of the SoilClim model for water balance and soil climate estimates," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(8), pages 1249-1261, May.
    5. Jamshidi, Sajad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Kamgar-Haghighi, Ali Akbar & Shahsavar, Ali Reza & Niyogi, Dev, 2020. "Evapotranspiration, crop coefficients, and physiological responses of citrus trees in semi-arid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Sara, Ourrai & Bouchra, Aithssaine & Abdelhakim, Amazirh & Salah, Er-RAKI & Lhoussaine, Bouchaou & Frederic, Jacob & Abdelghani, Chehbouni, 2024. "Assessment of the modified two-source energy balance (TSEB) model for estimating evapotranspiration and its components over an irrigated olive orchard in Morocco," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    7. El Hajj, Marcel M. & Johansen, Kasper & Almashharawi, Samer K. & McCabe, Matthew F., 2023. "Water uptake rates over olive orchards using Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    8. Yusong Deng & Gairen Yang & Zhifeng Xie & Jingrui Yu & Daihua Jiang & Zhigang Huang, 2020. "Effects of Different Weeding Methods on the Biomass of Vegetation and Soil Evaporation in Eucalyptus Plantations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Correa-Tedesco, Guillermo & Rousseaux, M. Cecilia & Searles, Peter S., 2010. "Plant growth and yield responses in olive (Olea europaea) to different irrigation levels in an arid region of Argentina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1829-1837, November.
    10. Trentacoste, E.R. & Contreras-Zanessi, O. & Beyá-Marshall, V. & Puertas, C.M., 2018. "Genotypic variation of physiological and morphological traits of seven olive cultivars under sustained and cyclic drought in Mendoza, Argentina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 48-56.
    11. Zhao, Peng & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2018. "Seasonal variations in vineyard ET partitioning and dual crop coefficients correlate with canopy development and surface soil moisture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 19-33.
    12. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Jiang, Xuelian & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Li, Sien & Du, Taisheng, 2016. "Applying segmented Jarvis canopy resistance into Penman-Monteith model improves the accuracy of estimated evapotranspiration in maize for seed production with film-mulching in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 314-324.
    13. Alcaras, L. Martín Agüero & Rousseaux, M. Cecilia & Searles, Peter S., 2016. "Responses of several soil and plant indicators to post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation in olive trees and their potential for irrigation scheduling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 10-20.
    14. Utset, Angel & Martinez-Cob, Antonio & Farre, Imma & Cavero, Jose, 2006. "Simulating the effects of extreme dry and wet years on the water use of flooding-irrigated maize in a Mediterranean landplane," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(1-2), pages 77-84, September.
    15. Dokoohaki, Hamze & Gheysari, Mahdi & Mousavi, Sayed-Farhad & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Miguez, Fernando E. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2016. "Coupling and testing a new soil water module in DSSAT CERES-Maize model for maize production under semi-arid condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 90-99.
    16. Zhang, Baozhong & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Tong, Ling & Du, Taisheng, 2010. "Variation in vineyard evapotranspiration in an arid region of northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1898-1904, November.
    17. Cruz-Blanco, M. & Lorite, I.J. & Santos, C., 2014. "An innovative remote sensing based reference evapotranspiration method to support irrigation water management under semi-arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 135-145.
    18. Padilla-Díaz, C.M. & Rodriguez-Dominguez, C.M. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Perez-Martin, A. & Fernández, J.E., 2016. "Scheduling regulated deficit irrigation in a hedgerow olive orchard from leaf turgor pressure related measurements," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 164(P1), pages 28-37.
    19. Iglesias, Maria Agustina & Rousseaux, M. Cecilia & Agüero Alcaras, L. Martín & Hamze, Leila & Searles, Peter S., 2023. "Influence of deficit irrigation and warming on plant water status during the late winter and spring in young olive trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    20. Kumar, Navneet & Arakeri, Jaywant H., 2020. "Mimicking some features of a root-soil system by dual porosity media," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:98:y:2010:i:1:p:12-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.