IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v221y2019icp220-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized reference evapotranspiration models with limited climatic data based on random forest and gene expression programming in Guangxi, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Sheng
  • Lian, Jinjiao
  • Peng, Yuzhong
  • Hu, Baoqing
  • Chen, Hongsong

Abstract

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is very important in hydrological cycle research, and is essential in agricultural water management and allocation. The application of the standard model (FAO-56 Penman-Monteith) to estimate ET0 is restricted due to the absence of required meteorological data. Although many machine learning algorithms have been applied in modeling ET0 with fewer meteorological variables, most of the models are trained and tested using data from the same station, their performances outside the training station are not evaluated. This study aims to investigate generalization ability of the random forest (RF) algorithm in modeling ET0 with different input combinations (refer to different circumstances in missing data), and compares this algorithm with the gene-expression programming (GEP) method using the data from 24 weather stations in a karst region of southwest China. The ET0 estimated by the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith model was used as a reference to evaluate the derived RF-based and GEP-based models, and the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficiency of efficiency (NSCE), root of mean squared error (RMSE), and percent bias (PBIAS) were used as evaluation criteria. The results revealed that the derived RF-based generalization ET0 models are successfully applied in modeling ET0 with complete and incomplete meteorological variables (R2, NSCE, RMSE and PBIAS ranged from 0.637 to 0.987, 0.626 to 0.986, 0.107 to 0.563 mm day−1, and −2.916% to 1.571%, respectively), and seven RF-based models corresponding to different incomplete data circumstances are proposed. The GEP-based generalization ET0 models are also proposed, and they produced promising results (R2, NSCE, RMSE and PBIAS ranged from 0.639 to 0.944, 0.636 to 0.942, 0.222 to 0.555 mm day−1, and −1.98% to 0.248%, respectively). Although the RF-based ET0 models performed slightly better than the GEP-based models, the GEP approach has the ability to give explicit expressions between the dependent and independent variables, which is more convenient for irrigators with minimal computer skills. Therefore, we recommend applying the RF-based models in water balance research, and the GEP-based models in agricultural irrigation practice. Moreover, the models performance decreased with periods due to climate change impact on ET0. At last, both of the two methods have the ability to assess the importance of predictors, the order of the importance of meteorological variables on ET0 in Guangxi is: sunshine duration, air temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Sheng & Lian, Jinjiao & Peng, Yuzhong & Hu, Baoqing & Chen, Hongsong, 2019. "Generalized reference evapotranspiration models with limited climatic data based on random forest and gene expression programming in Guangxi, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 220-230.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:221:y:2019:i:c:p:220-230
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419305499
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yassin, Mohamed A. & Alazba, A.A. & Mattar, Mohamed A., 2016. "Artificial neural networks versus gene expression programming for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 110-124.
    2. Ali Rahimikhoob, 2016. "Comparison of M5 Model Tree and Artificial Neural Network’s Methodologies in Modelling Daily Reference Evapotranspiration from NOAA Satellite Images," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 3063-3075, July.
    3. Falamarzi, Yashar & Palizdan, Narges & Huang, Yuk Feng & Lee, Teang Shui, 2014. "Estimating evapotranspiration from temperature and wind speed data using artificial and wavelet neural networks (WNNs)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 26-36.
    4. Allen, Richard G. & Pereira, Luis S. & Howell, Terry A. & Jensen, Marvin E., 2011. "Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 899-920, April.
    5. Kisi, Ozgur, 2016. "Modeling reference evapotranspiration using three different heuristic regression approaches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 162-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhan, Cun & Liang, Chuan & Zhao, Lu & Zhang, Yaling & Cheng, Long & Jiang, Shouzheng & Xing, Liwen, 2021. "Multifractal characteristics analysis of daily reference evapotranspiration in different climate zones of China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    2. Mohammadi, Babak & Mehdizadeh, Saeid, 2020. "Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration via a novel approach based on support vector regression coupled with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Ahmadi, Farshad & Mehdizadeh, Saeid & Mohammadi, Babak & Pham, Quoc Bao & DOAN, Thi Ngoc Canh & Vo, Ngoc Duong, 2021. "Application of an artificial intelligence technique enhanced with intelligent water drops for monthly reference evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Dilip Kumar Roy & Tapash Kumar Sarkar & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Bithin Datta, 2023. "Generalized Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Models Based on a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Tuned Fuzzy Tree Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 193-218, January.
    5. Su, Qiong & Singh, Vijay P. & Karthikeyan, Raghupathy, 2022. "Improved reference evapotranspiration methods for regional irrigation water demand estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Roy, Dilip Kumar & Lal, Alvin & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Saha, Kowshik Kumar & Datta, Bithin, 2021. "Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    7. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Wu, Lifeng & Peng, Youwen & Fan, Junliang & Wang, Yicheng & Huang, Guomin, 2021. "A novel kernel extreme learning machine model coupled with K-means clustering and firefly algorithm for estimating monthly reference evapotranspiration in parallel computation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Mohammad Taghi Sattari & Halit Apaydin & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Yan, Shicheng & Wu, Lifeng & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zou, Yufeng & Wu, You, 2021. "A novel hybrid WOA-XGB model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using local and external meteorological data: Applications in arid and humid regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    11. Phon Sheng Hou & Lokman Mohd Fadzil & Selvakumar Manickam & Mahmood A. Al-Shareeda, 2023. "Vector Autoregression Model-Based Forecasting of Reference Evapotranspiration in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Senzheng Chen & Huichun Ye & Chaojia Nie & Hongye Wang & Jingjing Wang, 2023. "Research on the Assessment Method of Sugarcane Cultivation Suitability in Guangxi Province, China, Based on Multi-Source Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França, 2020. "New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    14. Dilip Kumar Roy & Kowshik Kumar Saha & Mohammad Kamruzzaman & Sujit Kumar Biswas & Mohammad Anower Hossain, 2021. "Hierarchical Fuzzy Systems Integrated with Particle Swarm Optimization for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Prediction: a Novel Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5383-5407, December.
    15. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamaç, Sevim Seda & Todorovic, Mladen, 2020. "Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Shiri, Jalal, 2017. "Evaluation of FAO56-PM, empirical, semi-empirical and gene expression programming approaches for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in hyper-arid regions of Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 101-114.
    3. Tianao Wu & Wei Zhang & Xiyun Jiao & Weihua Guo & Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, 2020. "Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    5. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    6. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Salim Heddam & Zaher Mundher Yaseen & Shamsuddin Shahid & Ozgur Kisi & Binquan Li, 2020. "Prediction of Potential Evapotranspiration Using Temperature-Based Heuristic Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Traore, Seydou & Luo, Yufeng & Fipps, Guy, 2016. "Deployment of artificial neural network for short-term forecasting of evapotranspiration using public weather forecast restricted messages," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 363-379.
    8. Behrooz Keshtegar & Ozgur Kisi & Hamed Ghohani Arab & Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani, 2018. "Subset Modeling Basis ANFIS for Prediction of the Reference Evapotranspiration," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(3), pages 1101-1116, February.
    9. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    10. Darouich, Hanaa & Karfoul, Razan & Ramos, Tiago B. & Moustafa, Ali & Shaheen, Baraa & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Crop water requirements and crop coefficients for jute mallow (Corchorus olitorius L.) using the SIMDualKc model and assessing irrigation strategies for the Syrian Akkar region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Tao, Hai & Diop, Lamine & Bodian, Ansoumana & Djaman, Koffi & Ndiaye, Papa Malick & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2018. "Reference evapotranspiration prediction using hybridized fuzzy model with firefly algorithm: Regional case study in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 140-151.
    12. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Martínez-Molina, L. & Ruiz-Canales, A., 2015. "Selection of device to determine temperature gradients for estimating evapotranspiration using energy balance method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 136-147.
    13. Gao, Yang & Yang, Linlin & Shen, Xiaojun & Li, Xinqiang & Sun, Jingsheng & Duan, Aiwang & Wu, Laosheng, 2014. "Winter wheat with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI): Crop coefficients, water-use estimates, and effects of SDI on grain yield and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-10.
    14. Jovanovic, N. & Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Pôças, I. & Cantore, V. & Todorovic, M., 2020. "A review of strategies, methods and technologies to reduce non-beneficial consumptive water use on farms considering the FAO56 methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    15. Shahadha, Saadi Sattar & Wendroth, Ole & Zhu, Junfeng & Walton, Jason, 2019. "Can measured soil hydraulic properties simulate field water dynamics and crop production?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Escarabajal-Henarejos, D. & Molina-Martínez, J.M. & Fernández-Pacheco, D.G. & Cavas-Martínez, F. & García-Mateos, G., 2015. "Digital photography applied to irrigation management of Little Gem lettuce," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 148-157.
    17. Zhao, Nana & Liu, Yu & Cai, Jiabing & Paredes, Paula & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Dual crop coefficient modelling applied to the winter wheat–summer maize crop sequence in North China Plain: Basal crop coefficients and soil evaporation component," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 93-105.
    18. Hu, Xinyu & Zhao, Jinfeng & Sun, Shikun & Jia, Chengru & Zhang, Fuyao & Ma, Yizhe & Wang, Kaixuan & Wang, Yubao, 2023. "Evaluation of the temporal reconstruction methods for MODIS-based continuous daily actual evapotranspiration estimation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    19. Elfarkh, Jamal & Simonneaux, Vincent & Jarlan, Lionel & Ezzahar, Jamal & Boulet, Gilles & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimates in a traditional irrigated area in semi-arid Mediterranean. Comparison of four remote sensing-based models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Segovia-Cardozo, Daniel Alberto & Rodríguez-Sinobas, Leonor & Zubelzu, Sergio, 2019. "Water use efficiency of corn among the irrigation districts across the Duero river basin (Spain): Estimation of local crop coefficients by satellite images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 241-251.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:221:y:2019:i:c:p:220-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.