IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v234y2020ics0378377419322383.html

New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ferreira, Lucas Borges
  • da Cunha, Fernando França

Abstract

Computation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) poses a challenge under limited meteorological data availability. However, even in this case, hourly data may be available since low-cost sensors can report hourly measurements. This study evaluates, for the first time, in regional and local scenarios, the use of limited hourly meteorological data (temperature and relative humidity or only temperature) to estimate daily ETo directly and by summing hourly ETo values, employing RF, XGBoost, ANN and CNN. The following options were evaluated: (i) use of daily input data (conventional approach); (ii) use of hourly data measured during a 24 h period + hourly extraterrestrial radiation (Ra) to estimate daily ETo directly; (iii) the same configuration of the last option, but with daily Ra instead of hourly Ra; and (iv) use of hourly data to estimate hourly ETo and then to estimate daily ETo by summing hourly ETo. All options used Ra. To develop and evaluate the models, two daily ETo targets were considered: ETod (computed using the daily version of the ASCE-PM equation) and ETosoh (computed by summing hourly ETo obtained with the ASCE-PM equation). Data from 53 weather stations located in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, were used. For all models, the best results were found using hourly data to estimate daily ETo directly. CNN models developed with 24 h hourly data + hourly Ra offered the best performance in all cases. In relation to the best models developed with daily data, RMSE reduced by up to 28.2 % (0.71 to 0.51) and NSE and R2 increased by up to 21.7 (0.69 to 0.84) and 11.4 % (0.79 to 0.88), respectively, in regional scenario. In local scenario, RMSE reduced by up to 22.4 % (0.58 to 0.45) and NSE and R2 increased by up to 10.1 (0.79 to 0.87) and 11.3 % (0.80 to 0.89), respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França, 2020. "New approach to estimate daily reference evapotranspiration based on hourly temperature and relative humidity using machine learning and deep learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:234:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419322383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419322383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Sheng & Lian, Jinjiao & Peng, Yuzhong & Hu, Baoqing & Chen, Hongsong, 2019. "Generalized reference evapotranspiration models with limited climatic data based on random forest and gene expression programming in Guangxi, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 220-230.
    2. Allen, Richard G. & Pruitt, William O. & Wright, James L. & Howell, Terry A. & Ventura, Francesca & Snyder, Richard & Itenfisu, Daniel & Steduto, Pasquale & Berengena, Joaquin & Yrisarry, Javier Basel, 2006. "A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(1-2), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Matin Ahooghalandari & Mehdi Khiadani & Mina Esmi Jahromi, 2016. "Developing Equations for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3815-3828, September.
    4. Chatzithomas, C.D. & Alexandris, S.G., 2015. "Solar radiation and relative humidity based, empirical method, to estimate hourly reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 188-197.
    5. Althoff, Daniel & Filgueiras, Roberto & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva, 2019. "Impact of sum-of-hourly and daily timesteps in the computations of reference evapotranspiration across the Brazilian territory," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Feng, Yu & Cui, Ningbo & Gong, Daozhi & Zhang, Qingwen & Zhao, Lu, 2017. "Evaluation of random forests and generalized regression neural networks for daily reference evapotranspiration modelling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 163-173.
    7. Fan, Junliang & Ma, Xin & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang & Yu, Xiang & Zeng, Wenzhi, 2019. "Light Gradient Boosting Machine: An efficient soft computing model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with local and external meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Alexandris, S. & Kerkides, P., 2003. "New empirical formula for hourly estimations of reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 157-180, May.
    9. Valiantzas, John D., 2018. "Temperature-and humidity-based simplified Penman’s ET0 formulae. Comparisons with temperature-based Hargreaves-Samani and other methodologies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 326-334.
    10. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S., 2019. "Computing FAO56 reference grass evapotranspiration PM-ETo from temperature with focus on solar radiation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 86-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan, Shicheng & Wu, Lifeng & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zou, Yufeng & Wu, You, 2021. "A novel hybrid WOA-XGB model for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration using local and external meteorological data: Applications in arid and humid regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    2. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Mohammadi, Babak & Mehdizadeh, Saeid, 2020. "Modeling daily reference evapotranspiration via a novel approach based on support vector regression coupled with whale optimization algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Wu, Lifeng & Peng, Youwen & Fan, Junliang & Wang, Yicheng & Huang, Guomin, 2021. "A novel kernel extreme learning machine model coupled with K-means clustering and firefly algorithm for estimating monthly reference evapotranspiration in parallel computation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Tianao Wu & Wei Zhang & Xiyun Jiao & Weihua Guo & Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, 2020. "Comparison of five Boosting-based models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with limited meteorological variables," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    6. Jitendra Rajput & Man Singh & Khajanchi Lal & Manoj Khanna & Arjamadutta Sarangi & Joydeep Mukherjee & Shrawan Singh, 2024. "Selection of alternate reference evapotranspiration models based on multi-criteria decision ranking for semiarid climate," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 11171-11216, May.
    7. Yamaç, Sevim Seda, 2021. "Artificial intelligence methods reliably predict crop evapotranspiration with different combinations of meteorological data for sugar beet in a semiarid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    8. Li, Yao & Liu, Xuanang & Zhang, Xuegui & Gu, Xiaobo & Yu, Lianyu & Cai, Huanjie & Peng, Xiongbiao, 2025. "Using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to predict winter wheat actual evapotranspiration through machine learning and deep learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    9. Shima Amani & Hossein Shafizadeh-Moghadam & Saeid Morid, 2024. "Utilizing Machine Learning Models with Limited Meteorological Data as Alternatives for the FAO-56PM Model in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(6), pages 1921-1942, April.
    10. Widmoser, Peter, 2009. "A discussion on and alternative to the Penman-Monteith equation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 711-721, April.
    11. Malik, Anurag & Jamei, Mehdi & Ali, Mumtaz & Prasad, Ramendra & Karbasi, Masoud & Yaseen, Zaher Mundher, 2022. "Multi-step daily forecasting of reference evapotranspiration for different climates of India: A modern multivariate complementary technique reinforced with ridge regression feature selection," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    12. Bellido-Jiménez, Juan A. & Estévez, Javier & García-Marín, Amanda P., 2022. "A regional machine learning method to outperform temperature-based reference evapotranspiration estimations in Southern Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França & Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio, 2022. "Exploring machine learning and multi-task learning to estimate meteorological data and reference evapotranspiration across Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    14. Mohammad Taghi Sattari & Halit Apaydin & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "Performance Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) and Tree-Based Models for Estimating ETo by Using Limited Meteorological Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Huang, Guomin & Dong, Jianhua & Wu, Lifeng & Luo, Jingwei & Qiu, Rangjian & Cui, Yaokui & Wang, Yicheng, 2025. "A new regional reference evapotranspiration model based on quantile approximation of meteorological variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    16. Ali Mokhtar & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Wessam El-Ssawy & Renata Graf & Pouya Aghelpour & Hongming He & Salma M. Hafez & Mohamed Abuarab, 2023. "Prediction of Irrigation Water Requirements for Green Beans-Based Machine Learning Algorithm Models in Arid Region," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(4), pages 1557-1580, March.
    17. Roy, Dilip Kumar & Lal, Alvin & Sarker, Khokan Kumer & Saha, Kowshik Kumar & Datta, Bithin, 2021. "Optimization algorithms as training approaches for prediction of reference evapotranspiration using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Guan, Ziyu & Qin, Changhai & Zhao, Yong & Qu, Junlin & Liu, Rong & Liu, Yuan & Che, Wenxin & Wang, Tao, 2026. "Interpretable machine learning workflow for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in China's five major dry-wet regions using limited meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    19. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi, 2022. "Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:234:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419322383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.