IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v283y2023ics0378377423001816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decreased latency in landsat-derived land surface temperature products: A case for near-real-time evapotranspiration estimation in California

Author

Listed:
  • Knipper, Kyle
  • Yang, Yun
  • Anderson, Martha
  • Bambach, Nicolas
  • Kustas, William
  • McElrone, Andrew
  • Gao, Feng
  • Alsina, Maria Mar

Abstract

Acquiring accurate measurements of crop consumptive water use in the form of evapotranspiration (ET) is increasingly important in California cropping systems as demands for water resources shift under a changing climate. Growers use various methods for estimating ET to guide irrigation management, some of which are based on satellite remote sensing. Although this approach has proven reliable, operational applications remain hindered by latency in satellite product delivery, due in part to computationally expensive atmospheric correction steps. This is particularly true in approaches that utilize thermal infrared (TIR) imagery, which is sensitive to atmospheric corrections. The current study evaluates two approaches to derive a pseudo-atmospherically corrected Land Surface Temperature (LST) in near-real-time (NRT) for ingestion into the ALEXI-DisALEXI ET model. Evaluation is done for selected Landsat scenes over California for the year 2022. Both approaches take advantage of the Landsat Collection 2 dataset, including availability of atmospheric correction parameters and atmospherically corrected LST. The first approach is based on the Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) and atmospheric correction parameters from previous overpass available in the Collection 2 dataset. The second is based on a random forest (RF) regression model, using Landsat Collection 2 atmospheric correction parameters and LST as input for training. Results indicate the RF approach outperforms the RTE approach, with an average mean absolute error of 0.6 K, compared to 2.0 K for the RTE method. The RTE method produces more spatial and temporal variability in LST due to temporal differences in atmospheric transmissivity. When used to estimate ET, we find little difference between NRT LST-based ET estimates and ET derived using the Collection 2 LST product, albeit RF-based ET provides less day-to-day variation. Results suggest promise in using such an approach to derive LST and subsequently ET in NRT, and toward improving daily water management and irrigation efficiency in the vineyard and orchard systems of California.

Suggested Citation

  • Knipper, Kyle & Yang, Yun & Anderson, Martha & Bambach, Nicolas & Kustas, William & McElrone, Andrew & Gao, Feng & Alsina, Maria Mar, 2023. "Decreased latency in landsat-derived land surface temperature products: A case for near-real-time evapotranspiration estimation in California," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:283:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423001816
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423001816
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. French, Andrew N. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Saber, Mazin & Gonzalez, Juan Roberto & Anderson, Ray, 2020. "Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Knipper, K.R. & Kustas, W.P. & Anderson, M.C. & Nieto, H. & Alfieri, J.G. & Prueger, J.H. & Hain, C.R. & Gao, F. & McKee, L.G. & Alsina, M. Mar & Sanchez, L., 2020. "Using high-spatiotemporal thermal satellite ET retrievals to monitor water use over California vineyards of different climate, vine variety and trellis design," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. A. Park Williams & Benjamin I. Cook & Jason E. Smerdon, 2022. "Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(3), pages 232-234, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams, Larry E. & Levin, Alexander D. & Fidelibus, Matthew W., 2022. "Crop coefficients (Kc) developed from canopy shaded area in California vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    2. Mhawej, Mario & Nasrallah, Ali & Abunnasr, Yaser & Fadel, Ali & Faour, Ghaleb, 2021. "Better irrigation management using the satellite-based adjusted single crop coefficient (aKc) for over sixty crop types in California, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    4. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Margiana Petersen-Rockney, 2022. "Farmers adapt to climate change irrespective of stated belief in climate change: a California case study," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Ramírez-Cuesta, J.M. & Intrigliolo, D.S. & Lorite, I.J. & Moreno, M.A. & Vanella, D. & Ballesteros, R. & Hernández-López, D. & Buesa, I., 2023. "Determining grapevine water use under different sustainable agronomic practices using METRIC-UAV surface energy balance model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    7. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Linghua Liu & Liang Zheng & Ying Wang & Chongchong Liu & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi, 2023. "Land Use and Ecosystem Services Evolution in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China: Implications for Sustainable Management of National Projects," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Brianda Hernandez Rosales & Alexandra Lutz, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Rooftop Rainwater Harvesting for Food Production in Northwestern Arizona on the Hualapai Indian Reservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Zitouna-Chebbi, Rim & Jacob, Frédéric & Prévot, Laurent & Voltz, Marc, 2023. "Documenting evapotranspiration and surface energy fluxes over rainfed annual crops within a Mediterranean hilly agrosystem," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Renee Obringer & Dave D. White, 2023. "Leveraging Unsupervised Learning to Develop a Typology of Residential Water Users’ Attitudes Towards Conservation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 37-53, January.
    12. Hao, Pengyu & Di, Liping & Guo, Liying, 2022. "Estimation of crop evapotranspiration from MODIS data by combining random forest and trapezoidal models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Ferreira, Thomás R. & Maguire, Mitchell S. & da Silva, Bernardo B. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Serrão, Edivaldo A.O. & Ferreira, Jéssica D. & de Moura, Magna S.B. & dos Santos, Carlos A.C. & Silva, Ma, 2023. "Assessment of water demands for irrigation using energy balance and satellite data fusion models in cloud computing: A study in the Brazilian semiarid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Ortega-Salazar, Samuel & Ortega-Farías, Samuel & Kilic, Ayse & Allen, Richard, 2021. "Performance of the METRIC model for mapping energy balance components and actual evapotranspiration over a superintensive drip-irrigated olive orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Elizabeth C. Hirschman, 2022. "Climate Change Migration and the Economic Rebirth of Central Appalachia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Amazirh, Abdelhakim & Er-Raki, Salah & Ojha, Nitu & Bouras, El houssaine & Rivalland, Vincent & Merlin, Olivier & Chehbouni, Abdelghani, 2022. "Assimilation of SMAP disaggregated soil moisture and Landsat land surface temperature to improve FAO-56 estimates of ET in semi-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    17. Douglas J. Kennett & Marilyn Masson & Carlos Peraza Lope & Stanley Serafin & Richard J. George & Tom C. Spencer & Julie A. Hoggarth & Brendan J. Culleton & Thomas K. Harper & Keith M. Prufer & Susan M, 2022. "Drought-Induced Civil Conflict Among the Ancient Maya," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Kang, Jian & Hao, Xinmei & Zhou, Huiping & Ding, Risheng, 2021. "An integrated strategy for improving water use efficiency by understanding physiological mechanisms of crops responding to water deficit: Present and prospect," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Taketo Eguchi & Masahiro Tasumi, 2023. "Paddy Rice Double-Cropping Field Monitoring via Vegetation Indices with Limited Ground Data—A Case Study for Thapanzeik Dam Irrigation District in Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:283:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423001816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.