IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v256y2021ics0378377421003243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Better irrigation management using the satellite-based adjusted single crop coefficient (aKc) for over sixty crop types in California, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Mhawej, Mario
  • Nasrallah, Ali
  • Abunnasr, Yaser
  • Fadel, Ali
  • Faour, Ghaleb

Abstract

Several Surface Energy Balance (SEB) models are currently used to unleash the boundless potential of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) techniques. Their main output, namely the actual evapotranspiration (ETa), is required for the assessment of water budget at basin, regional and national levels. Still, the lack of the required expertise coupled with sometimes missing input data limits their usage by researchers, policy makers, water managers and farmers. In this study, a novel comprehensive monthly adjusted crop coefficients (aKc) list was produced, in which these coefficients are usually used to retrieve the much-needed ETa using the climate-sensitive reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0). More particularly, the ETa is calculated for more than sixty different crop types present in the Mediterranean-climate California, United States. It is based on the two consecutive years of 2018 and 2019, which were wet and dry, respectively. The Google Earth Engine (GEE) version of the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land-Improved (SEBALI), surnamed SEBALIGEE, with an Absolute Mean Error (AME) of 9.56 mm/month in the study area was used along the annual crop map from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The main results showed that the average monthly aKc values ranged between 0.45 and 1.53. More specifically, October and November presented the lowest aKc values averaged among all crop types with aKc values around 0.76. On the other hand, March, April and June had the largest average aKc values at nearly 1.17. The monthly aKc values of the 60 crops studied in the plain of California, would potentially assist authorities and hydrologists to better calculate the actual monthly plant water consumption, in a simpler way over the upcoming years.

Suggested Citation

  • Mhawej, Mario & Nasrallah, Ali & Abunnasr, Yaser & Fadel, Ali & Faour, Ghaleb, 2021. "Better irrigation management using the satellite-based adjusted single crop coefficient (aKc) for over sixty crop types in California, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003243
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421003243
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. French, Andrew N. & Hunsaker, Douglas J. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Saber, Mazin & Gonzalez, Juan Roberto & Anderson, Ray, 2020. "Satellite-based NDVI crop coefficients and evapotranspiration with eddy covariance validation for multiple durum wheat fields in the US Southwest," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    2. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng, 2019. "Modeling evapotranspiration and its components of maize for seed production in an arid region of northwest China using a dual crop coefficient and multisource models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 105-117.
    3. Marin, Fábio R. & Angelocci, Luiz R. & Nassif, Daniel S.P. & Costa, Leandro G. & Vianna, Murilo S. & Carvalho, Kassio S., 2016. "Crop coefficient changes with reference evapotranspiration for highly canopy-atmosphere coupled crops," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 139-145.
    4. Allam, Mona & Mhawej, Mario & Meng, Qingyan & Faour, Ghaleb & Abunnasr, Yaser & Fadel, Ali & Xinli, Hu, 2021. "Monthly 10-m evapotranspiration rates retrieved by SEBALI with Sentinel-2 and MODIS LST data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Zanotelli, Damiano & Montagnani, Leonardo & Andreotti, Carlo & Tagliavini, Massimo, 2019. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient patterns of an apple orchard in a sub-humid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    6. Mhawej, Mario & Elias, Georgie & Nasrallah, Ali & Faour, Ghaleb, 2020. "Dynamic calibration for better SEBALI ET estimations: Validations and recommendations," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Spinelli, Gerardo M. & Snyder, Richard L. & Sanden, Blake L. & Shackel, Ken A., 2016. "Water stress causes stomatal closure but does not reduce canopy evapotranspiration in almond," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 11-22.
    8. Piccinni, Giovanni & Ko, Jonghan & Marek, Thomas & Howell, Terry, 2009. "Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (KC) of maize and sorghum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1698-1704, December.
    9. Benli, Bogachan & Kodal, Suleyman & Ilbeyi, Adem & Ustun, Haluk, 2006. "Determination of evapotranspiration and basal crop coefficient of alfalfa with a weighing lysimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 358-370, March.
    10. Mhawej, Mario & Caiserman, Arnaud & Nasrallah, Ali & Dawi, Ali & Bachour, Roula & Faour, Ghaleb, 2020. "Automated evapotranspiration retrieval model with missing soil-related datasets: The proposal of SEBALI," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Ko, Jonghan & Piccinni, Giovanni & Marek, Thomas & Howell, Terry, 2009. "Determination of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients (Kc) of cotton and wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1691-1697, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nxumalo Gift Siphiwe & Tamás Magyar & János Tamás & Attila Nagy, 2024. "Modelling Soil Moisture Content with Hydrus 2D in a Continental Climate for Effective Maize Irrigation Planning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. French, Andrew N. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Wirth, Troy & Scott, Andrew & Shields, John W. & Bautista, Eduardo & Saber, Mazin N. & Wisniewski, Elzbieta & Gohardoust, Mohammadreza R., 2023. "Remote sensing of evapotranspiration for irrigated crops at Yuma, Arizona, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabzchi-Dehkharghani, Hamed & Nazemi, Amir Hossein & Sadraddini, Ali Ashraf & Majnooni-Heris, Abolfazl & Biswas, Asim, 2021. "Recognition of different yield potentials among rain-fed wheat fields before harvest using remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Hunsaker, D.J. & López-Urrea, R. & Mohammadi Shad, Z., 2021. "Standard single and basal crop coefficients for field crops. Updates and advances to the FAO56 crop water requirements method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. French, Andrew N. & Sanchez, Charles A. & Wirth, Troy & Scott, Andrew & Shields, John W. & Bautista, Eduardo & Saber, Mazin N. & Wisniewski, Elzbieta & Gohardoust, Mohammadreza R., 2023. "Remote sensing of evapotranspiration for irrigated crops at Yuma, Arizona, USA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    4. Amazirh, Abdelhakim & Er-Raki, Salah & Ojha, Nitu & Bouras, El houssaine & Rivalland, Vincent & Merlin, Olivier & Chehbouni, Abdelghani, 2022. "Assimilation of SMAP disaggregated soil moisture and Landsat land surface temperature to improve FAO-56 estimates of ET in semi-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Paulo Vinicius Demeneck Vieira & Paulo Sérgio Lourenço de Freitas & Roberto Rezende & Rivanildo Dallacort & João Danilo Barbieri & Diego Fernando Daniel, 2024. "Calibration and Simulation of the CERES-Sorghum and CERES-Maize Models for Crops in the Central-West Region of Paraná State," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(18), pages 140-140, April.
    7. Rosa, R.D. & Ramos, T.B. & Pereira, L.S., 2016. "The dual Kc approach to assess maize and sweet sorghum transpiration and soil evaporation under saline conditions: Application of the SIMDualKc model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 77-94.
    8. Zhao, Nana & Liu, Yu & Cai, Jiabing & Paredes, Paula & Rosa, Ricardo D. & Pereira, Luis S., 2013. "Dual crop coefficient modelling applied to the winter wheat–summer maize crop sequence in North China Plain: Basal crop coefficients and soil evaporation component," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 93-105.
    9. Muniandy, Josilva M. & Yusop, Zulkifli & Askari, Muhamad, 2016. "Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models and determination of crop coefficient for Momordica charantia and Capsicum annuum," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 77-89.
    10. Wei, Jun & Cui, Yuanlai & Zhou, Sihang & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Regional water-saving potential calculation method for paddy rice based on remote sensing," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    11. Meysam ABEDINPOUR, 2015. "Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(2), pages 99-104.
    12. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Lima, Carlos Eduardo Santos de & Costa, Valéria Sandra de Oliveira & Galvíncio, Josiclêda Domiciano & Silva, Richarde Marques da & Santos, Celso Augusto Guimarães, 2021. "Assessment of automated evapotranspiration estimates obtained using the GP-SEBAL algorithm for dry forest vegetation (Caatinga) and agricultural areas in the Brazilian semiarid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    14. Kumar, Vipan & Udeigwe, Theophilus K. & Clawson, Ernest L. & Rohli, Robert V. & Miller, Donnie K., 2015. "Crop water use and stage-specific crop coefficients for irrigated cotton in the mid-south, United States," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 63-69.
    15. Teixeira, Antônio & Leivas, Janice & Struiving, Tiago & Reis, João & Simão, Fúlvio, 2021. "Energy balance and irrigation performance assessments in lemon orchards by applying the SAFER algorithm to Landsat 8 images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Raphael, O.D. & Ogedengbe, K. & Fasinmirin, J.T. & Okunade, D. & Akande, I. & Gbadamosi, A., 2018. "Growth-stage-specific crop coefficient and consumptive use of Capsicum chinense using hydraulic weighing lysimeter," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 179-185.
    17. Irmak, Suat & Kukal, Meetpal S., 2019. "Disk-till vs. no-till maize grass- and alfalfa-reference single (average) and basal (dual) crop coefficients," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Gloaguen, Romain M. & Rowland, Diane L. & Brym, Zachary T. & Wilson, Chris. H. & Chun, Hyen Chung & Langham, Ray, 2021. "A METHOD FOR DEVELOPING IRRIGATION DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS de novo: EXAMPLE OF SESAME (Sesamum indicum L.) A KNOWN DROUGHT TOLERANT SPECIES," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Danny Harel & Myron Sofer & Moshe Broner & Dovi Zohar & Shelly Gantz, 2014. "Growth-Stage-Specific Kc of Greenhouse Tomato Plants Grown in Semi-Arid Mediterranean Region," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(11), pages 132-132, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.