IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/jsserr/v12y2025i1p126-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Research Novelty and Research Gaps: Strategies for Identifying Unexplored Areas and Pioneering Innovative Contributions

Author

Listed:
  • Remi Chukwudi Okeke

    (Ph.D, Department of Public Administration, Madonna University, Nigeria, Okija Campus)

Abstract

This paper aims to guide researchers in understanding how to strategically position their work within their academic fields while driving innovative contributions. In academic research, the ability to identify novelty and address research gaps is crucial to advancing knowledge and solving real-world problems. The paper explores the distinction between research novelty and research gaps, and presents strategies for recognizing uncharted areas of study while pioneering innovative contributions. It is intended to guide early-career researchers, other academics and scholars, toward a deeper understanding of how to contribute meaningfully to their fields. By examining examples across various disciplines, the paper highlights practical approaches for developing groundbreaking research that not only fills existing gaps but also drives future inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • Remi Chukwudi Okeke, 2025. "Understanding Research Novelty and Research Gaps: Strategies for Identifying Unexplored Areas and Pioneering Innovative Contributions," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 12(1), pages 126-130, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:126-130
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15804528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/sserr-12-1-126-130.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.15804528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinjin Ma & Yidi Chen & Huanya Zhu & Yiqun Gan, 2023. "Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation through an Online Game Based on the Inoculation Theory: Analyzing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Threat and Persuasion Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Verhoeven, Dennis & Bakker, Jurriën & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 707-723.
    3. Weng Marc Lim & Satish Kumar & Faizan Ali, 2022. "Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘what’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7-8), pages 481-513, June.
    4. Janssen, M. & Stoopendaal, A.M.V. & Putters, K., 2015. "Situated novelty: Introducing a process perspective on the study of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1974-1984.
    5. Veugelers, Reinhilde & Wang, Jian, 2019. "Scientific novelty and technological impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1362-1372.
    6. Issah Baako & Hamza Alhassan & Prosper Gidisu, 2022. "Understanding and spotting research gaps through a systematic literature review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(3), pages 549-554, March.
    7. Femi Olan & Uchitha Jayawickrama & Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun & Jana Suklan & Shaofeng Liu, 2024. "Fake news on Social Media: the Impact on Society," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 443-458, April.
    8. Matthew T.J. Halma & Jessica Rose & Theresa Lawrie, 2023. "The Novelty of mRNA Viral Vaccines and Potential Harms: A Scoping Review," J, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Trapido, Denis, 2015. "How novelty in knowledge earns recognition: The role of consistent identities," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8), pages 1488-1500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Zhao & Chengzhi Zhang, 2025. "A review on the novelty measurements of academic papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 727-753, February.
    2. Sotaro Shibayama & Deyun Yin & Kuniko Matsumoto, 2021. "Measuring novelty in science with word embedding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Ke, Qing, 2020. "Technological impact of biomedical research: The role of basicness and novelty," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    4. Edoardo Filippi-Mazzola & Federica Bianchi & Ernst C Wit, 2023. "Drivers of the decrease of patent similarities from 1976 to 2021," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, March.
    5. Nicolas Carayol, 2016. "The Right Job and the Job Right: Novelty, Impact and Journal Stratification in Science," Post-Print hal-02274661, HAL.
    6. Quentin Plantec & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2020. "Impact of knowledge search practices on the originality of inventions: a study in the oil & gas industry," Post-Print hal-02613665, HAL.
    7. Plantec, Quentin & Deval, Marie-Alix & Hooge, Sophie & Weil, Benoit, 2023. "Big data as an exploration trigger or problem-solving patch: Design and integration of AI-embedded systems in the automotive industry," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    8. Deyun Yin & Zhao Wu & Kazuki Yokota & Kuniko Matsumoto & Sotaro Shibayama, 2023. "Identify novel elements of knowledge with word embedding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Keye Wu & Ziyue Xie & Jia Tina Du, 2024. "Does science disrupt technology? Examining science intensity, novelty, and recency through patent-paper citations in the pharmaceutical field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5469-5491, September.
    10. Brea, Edgar, 2024. "The yin yang of AI: Exploring how commercial and non-commercial orientations shape machine learning innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    11. Elena M. Tur & Evangelos Bourelos & Maureen McKelvey, 2022. "The case of sleeping beauties in nanotechnology: a study of potential breakthrough inventions in emerging technologies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(3), pages 683-708, December.
    12. Plantec, Quentin & Le Masson, Pascal & Weil, Benoît, 2021. "Impact of knowledge search practices on the originality of inventions: A study in the oil & gas industry through dynamic patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Kuniko Matsumoto & Sotaro Shibayama & Byeongwoo Kang & Masatsura Igami, 2021. "Introducing a novelty indicator for scientific research: validating the knowledge-based combinatorial approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6891-6915, August.
    14. Libo Sheng & Dongqing Lyu & Xuanmin Ruan & Hongquan Shen & Ying Cheng, 2023. "The association between prior knowledge and the disruption of an article," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4731-4751, August.
    15. Wang, Dan & Zhou, Xiao & Zhao, Pengwei & Pang, Juan & Ren, Qiaoyang, 2025. "Early identification of breakthrough technologies: Insights from science-driven innovations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    16. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    17. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Seokbeom Kwon & Jan Youtie & Alan Porter & Nils Newman, 2024. "How does regulatory uncertainty shape the innovation process? Evidence from the case of nanomedicine," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 262-302, February.
    19. Kathryn Rudie Harrigan & Maria Chiara Guardo & Bo Cowgill, 2017. "Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1212-1233, October.
    20. Archibugi, Daniele & Mariella, Vitantonio & Vezzani, Antonio, 2025. "What next? Nations in the technological race through the 2030," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:12:y:2025:i:1:p:126-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/cadr_juridic/departament_comunicare_jurnalism_stiinte_ale_educatiei/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.