IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2018-04-28.html

Business Environmental Analysis with Competitive Profile Matrix Method on Market Optimization in Real Estate Company (A Case Study at Tangerang Selatan Area)

Author

Listed:
  • Yulizar Widiatama

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

  • Aceng Abdul Hamid

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

  • Martono Martono

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia,)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the competitiveness of real estate company as well as strategies that can be done company based on the level of importance and performance. The problem that often faced is about the competitiveness of business with other real estate companies that continue to grow. Otherwise, reduced sales turnover among the real estate companies become a serious problem for their financial status. Whereas, the company must make efforts to obtain the market share, change the sales strategy, and improve the concept of the human resource environment to achieve the target set by the company. By analyzing the real estate company's sales turnover and competitiveness with Competitive Profile Matrix and BCG Matrix method to visualize the existing condition occurred. The results of data processing of sales transactions in August 2015-July 2016 amounted to 569 units, in average, sales made by the company approximately 2 units / day. By observation from 3 Real Estate Companies in Tangerang Selatan showed that August 2015 has the lowest unit sold within the area by only 24 units sold, even though the sales were increasing by September 2015 but the trend are still degrading until July 2016. The study need the correct tools to visualize the problem and turn the result as opportunities for Real Estate Companies in Tangerang Selatan. Meanwhile the EFE Matrix value shows 2.91, IFE Matrix value shows 2.48, the value of IE Matrix shows 2.69. As for the value of Competitive Profile Matrix obtained for 2.56, from GE McKinsey matrix showed the position of real estate at high industry attractiveness quadrant with a score of 3.88 and high business strength position with a score of 3.93. There was a growth rate of 52% and a relative market share of 1.31 using the BCG Matrix. An appropriate strategy for real estate companies in Tangerang Selatan is a market penetration strategy to expanding their business directly to the consumer, product development to enhance the innovative housing product, horizontal integration (integrated horizontal) with the supplier to have economies of scale and joint venue with other business to enhance the markets of their products.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulizar Widiatama & Aceng Abdul Hamid & Martono Martono, 2018. "Business Environmental Analysis with Competitive Profile Matrix Method on Market Optimization in Real Estate Company (A Case Study at Tangerang Selatan Area)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 222-226.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2018-04-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/6652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/6652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Jie & Leung, Woon Sau & Evans, Kevin P., 2016. "Are employee-friendly workplaces conducive to innovation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 61-79.
    2. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar G. & Cavusgil, Erin, 2017. "Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: Contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 527-543.
    3. William Ascher & Corinne Krupp, 2010. "Rethinking Physical Infrastructure Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: William Ascher & Corinne Krupp (ed.), Physical Infrastructure Development: Balancing the Growth, Equity, and Environmental Imperatives, chapter 0, pages 1-33, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peixu He & Yana Pei & Chunpei Lin & Di Ye, 2021. "Ambidextrous Marketing Capabilities, Exploratory and Exploitative Market-Based Innovation, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Ylinen, Mika & Ranta, Mikko, 2025. "Predicting corporate innovation using machine learning and social media data," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. John T. Mann & Steven R. Miller & Trey Malone, 2022. "Can Targeted Government Investment in Rural Establishments Induce Innovative Activity?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(3), pages 228-244, August.
    5. Rubina Romanello & Maria Chiarvesio, 2019. "Early internationalizing firms: 2004–2018," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 172-219, June.
    6. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Silvia L. Martin & Rajshekhar (Raj) G. Javalgi, 2018. "Epistemological foundations of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 671-680, September.
    8. Martin, Silvia L. & Javalgi, Rajshekhar (Raj) G. & Ciravegna, Luciano, 2018. "Service advantage built on service capabilities: An empirical inquiry of international new ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 371-381.
    9. Wann Yih Wu & Phuoc Thien Nguyen, 2019. "The Antecedents Of Dynamic Service Innovation Capabilities: The Moderating Roles Of Market Dynamism And Market Orientation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-30, October.
    10. Collins Kankam-Kwarteng & Appiah Sarpong & Ofosu Amofah & Stephen Acheampong, 2021. "Marketing performance of service firms: Recognizing market sensing capability and customer interaction orientation," Post-Print hal-03376959, HAL.
    11. Miočević, Dario & Talaja, Anita & Alfirević, Nikša, 2021. "Disentangling performance outcomes of a firm’s innovativeness: A resource-advantage perspective," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(3), pages 392-414.
    12. April Gunawan & Larsen Barsa & Hotman Tua, 2018. "Determinant of Lecturers Work Satisfaction and Implication on Lecturers Performance at Maritime Higher Education in DKI Jakarta," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(4), pages 14-23.
    13. Xiaohong Fan & Sailu Li & Natalia Villatoro, 2021. "CEO gender and corporate labor cost," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 360-380, July.
    14. Becker, Mary & Cardazzi, Alexander & McGurk, Zachary, 2022. "Employee satisfaction and stock returns during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    15. Ahmed Baig & Hassan Anjum Butt & Abrar Fitwi & Joey Smith, 2021. "Does Innovation Explain the Skewness of Stock Returns?," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 12-31.
    16. Phan, Trang Hoai, 2022. "Working Conditions, Export Decisions, and Firm Constraints-Evidence from Vietnamese Small and Medium Enterprises," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 133903, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Hiu Kan Wong, Ada & Xinru Wu, Crystal & Whitla, Paul & Stanley Snell, Robin, 2022. "How LMX and marketing capabilities guide and motivate customer-facing employees’ learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 161-169.
    18. García-Lillo, Francisco & Seva-Larrosa, Pedro & Sánchez-García, Eduardo, 2023. "What is going on in entrepreneurship research? A bibliometric and SNA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    19. David B. Audretsch & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "Is ambidexterity the missing link between entrepreneurship, management, and innovation?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1891-1918, December.
    20. Leković, Bojan & Amidžić, Renata & Vojinović, Dragan & Ivanović-Đukić, Maja, 2023. "Drivers for the Internationalization of Nascent Entrepreneurs and New Business Owners in Southeast European Countries," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 28(1), pages 182-214.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • R30 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - General
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2018-04-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Monica Sinhat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.