IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-22-00177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D rivalry with the interaction of output subsidies in an extensive endogenous timing game

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Chen

    (Chonnam National University)

  • Sang-ho Lee

    (Chonnam National University)

Abstract

This study investigates strategic interplay between government's output subsidies and firms' R&D rivalry in an extensive endogenous timing game. We find that research spillovers are crucial in determining multiple equilibria of the game, which yields different welfare consequences. We show that a simultaneous-move game appears at equilibrium if the spillovers rate is extremely low, but it is always socially undesirable. We also show that the government plays as a leader or a follower at equilibrium, while it could cause welfare loss unless spillovers rate is either high or sufficiently low. Our findings suggest that the appropriate role of the government in providing output subsidies should be based on the rate of research spillovers when the firms strategically choose their endogenous timings of R&D activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Chen & Sang-ho Lee, 2022. "R&D rivalry with the interaction of output subsidies in an extensive endogenous timing game," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(3), pages 1621-1630.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2022/Volume42/EB-22-V42-I3-P135.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Endogenous R&D choice game; Research spillovers; Output subsidies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-22-00177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.