IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2012i6p88-98.html

The Impact of Corporate Governance Implementation on Public Company Bond Ratings and Yield: a Case of Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Mafudi

    (Jenderal Soedirman University)

  • Negina Kencono Putri

    (Jenderal Soedirman University)

Abstract

This study aims at examining the effect of the implementation of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields. We used the sample of firms that issued bonds in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2007-2011. Pool the Data observation period started on January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2011. Data obtained from PT PEFINDO ratings that bond rating is an independent institution in Indonesia. Data were analyzed by using logistic regression analysis (logit) and multivariate regression. Logit analysis is used to test the effect of corporate governance on bond ratings. Multivariate regression analysis is used to test the effect of corporate governance on bond yields. The results show that not all elements of corporate governance ratings and bond yields affect. The number of independent commissioners’ positive effect on bond ratings and a negative effect on bond yields. In addition, the existence of an audit committee, statistically significant negative effect on bond yields. This shows that the existence of an audit committee is a variable to be considered by investors in the bond investment

Suggested Citation

  • Mafudi & Negina Kencono Putri, 2012. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Implementation on Public Company Bond Ratings and Yield: a Case of Indonesia," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 8(6), pages 88-98, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:6:p:88-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1533
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 1991. "The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 20(4), Winter.
    2. Kamstra, Mark & Kennedy, Peter & Suan, Teck-Kin, 2001. "Combining Bond Rating Forecasts Using Logit," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 36(2), pages 75-96, May.
    3. Sanjeev Bhojraj & Partha Sengupta, 2003. "Effect of Corporate Governance on Bond Ratings and Yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(3), pages 455-476, July.
    4. Julie Cotter & Mark Silvester, 2003. "Board and Monitoring Committee Independence," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(2), pages 211-232, June.
    5. Jeff Jewell & Miles Livingston, 1998. "Split Ratings, Bond Yields, And Underwriter Spreads," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 21(2), pages 185-204, June.
    6. Stuart Turley & Mahbub Zaman, 2004. "The Corporate Governance Effects of Audit Committees," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 8(3), pages 305-332, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Chung-Hua & Huang, Yu-Li & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2012. "Asymmetric benchmarking in bank credit rating," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 171-193.
    2. Jaspreet Kaur & Madhu Vij & Ajay Kumar Chauhan, 2023. "Signals influencing corporate credit ratings—a systematic literature review," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 91-114, March.
    3. Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2013. "What Determines Audit Independence and Expertise in Russia? Firm-Level Evidence," RRC Working Paper Series 27_v2, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Z. Jun Lin & Jason Z. Xiao & Qingliang Tang, 2008. "The roles, responsibilities and characteristics of audit committee in China," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(5), pages 721-751, June.
    5. Jacqueline Christensen & Pamela Kent & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Corporate Governance and Company Performance in Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 372-386, December.
    6. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Inmaculada Bel‐Oms, 2019. "What have we learnt about board gender diversity as a business strategy? The appointment of board subcommittees," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 301-315, February.
    7. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, May.
    8. Khoo, Shee-Yee & Klein, Paul-Olivier, 2025. "Islamic bonds ratings and the price of risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Fitriya Fauzi & Abdul Basyith & Dani Foo, 2017. "Committee on board: Does it matter? A study of Indonesian Sharia-listed firms," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1316547-131, January.
    10. Roman Lanis & Grant Richardson & Brett Govendir & Gregory Pazmandy, 2021. "The effect of board of directors’ expertise and tax avoidance on corporate debt," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4475-4511, September.
    11. Husam Aldamen & Keith Duncan & Simone Kelly & Ray McNamara & Stephan Nagel, 2012. "Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 52(4), pages 971-1000, December.
    12. Zhao, Yuhan & Zhang, Yaqi & He, Pinglin, 2025. "The relationship between board characteristics and corporate credit ratings—Evidence based on the Chinese market," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 292-316.
    13. Le, Quyen & Vafaei, Alireza & Ahmed, Kamran & Kutubi, Shawgat, 2022. "Independent directors' reputation incentives and firm performance – an Australian perspective," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Themistokles Lazarides & Evaggelos Drimpetas, 2016. "Defining the factors of Fitch rankings in the European banking sector," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(2), pages 315-339, August.
    15. Hussein Abedi Shamsabadi & Byung-Seong Min & Richard Chung, 2016. "Corporate governance and dividend strategy: lessons from Australia," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 583-610, October.
    16. Matthies, Alexander B., 2013. "Empirical research on corporate credit-ratings: A literature review," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2013-003, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    17. Rubina Shaheen & Attiya Yasmin Javid, 2014. "Effect of Credit Rating on Firm Performance and Stock Return; Evidence form KSE Listed Firms," PIDE-Working Papers 2014:104, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    18. James, Hui Liang & Ngo, Thanh & Wang, Hongxia, 2021. "Independent director tenure and corporate transparency," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Benjamin S. Kay & Cindy M. Vojtech, 2015. "Corporate Governance Responses to Director Rule Changes," Staff Discussion Papers 15-02, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    20. Almaskati, Nawaf & Bird, Ron & Yeung, Danny & Lu, Yue, 2021. "A horse race of models and estimation methods for predicting bankruptcy," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:6:p:88-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.