IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/75-4-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatisierung und Bankperformance

Author

Listed:
  • Stephan Paul
  • Laura Kästner

Abstract

Following the controversial discussion on banking industry's performance, this study analyses the main driving forces of banks and banking systems profitability: Are performance differences primarily due to country specific institutional attributes (here related to ownership structures in the European banking industries) or structural characteristics of the banking system (aligned to consolidation and concentration processes in banking markets), or can they mainly be attributed to bank specific, strategic features expressed by financial ratios? Using recursive partitioning, the sample of around 3,000 European banks is successively divided by the most discriminatory predictor with regard to the dependent variable return on equity in as homogenous sub-segments as possible. The algorithm chooses the institutional characteristic ownership of savings banks as the most selective input factor. Banks located in countries with at least first privatization success indicate a significant higher profitability than banks resident in countries with public dominated savings banks sectors. Anknüpfend an die kontrovers geführte Diskussion über die Performance der Kreditwirtschaft in Deutschland geht dieser Beitrag auf Basis einer empirischen Analyse der Frage nach den Haupteinflussfaktoren der Rentabilität von Banken und Bankensystemen in Europa nach: Lassen sich Performanceunterschiede im Wesentlichen auf institutionelle oder strukturelle länderspezifische Systemmerkmale zurückführen, die insbesondere an divergierenden Eigentumsstrukturen bzw. Konsolidierungs- und Konzentrationsprozessen ansetzen? Oder prägen vielmehr bankindividuelle geschäftspolitische Merkmale die Rentabilität? Mittels rekursiver Partitionierung wird das Untersuchungssample bestehend aus 3000 europäischen Banken im Hinblick auf die ausgewählte Performance- Zielgröße "Eigenkapitalrendite" schrittweise anhand des jeweils trennschärfsten Inputfaktors in möglichst homogene Subsegmente unterteilt. Das vom Algorithmus als trennschärfstes Kriterium ausgewiesene institutionelle Merkmal "Eigentum an Sparkassen" separiert Banken aus Ländern mit Privatisierungserfolgen von Banken aus Ländern mit einem durch öffentliches Eigentum dominierten Sparkassensektor. Demnach weisen Banken aus Ländern mit ersten Privatisierungserfolgen signifikant höhere Renditen auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephan Paul & Laura Kästner, 2006. "Privatisierung und Bankperformance," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 75(4), pages 33-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:75-4-3
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.75.4.33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.75.4.33
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.75.4.33?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sapienza, Paola, 2004. "The effects of government ownership on bank lending," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 357-384, May.
    2. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2002. "Government Ownership of Banks," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 265-301, February.
    3. Hella Engerer, 2005. "Bankenlandschaft Europa: Eigentum, Wettbewerb und Integration," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(4), pages 12-31.
    4. G. V. Kass, 1980. "An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(2), pages 119-127, June.
    5. Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1994. "Politicians and Firms," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 109(4), pages 995-1025.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Li & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schröder, Michael & Xu, Xian, 2019. "Politicians’ promotion incentives and bank risk exposure in China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-94.
    2. Howard Bodenhorn, 2010. "Federal and State Commercial Banking Policy in the Federalist Era and Beyond," NBER Chapters, in: Founding Choices: American Economic Policy in the 1790s, pages 151-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Boubakri, Narjess & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Hossain, Mahmud, 2020. "Post-privatization state ownership and bank risk-taking: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Denis Davydov, 2018. "Does State Ownership of Banks Matter?," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2), pages 250-285, August.
    5. Thanh Ngo & Jurica Susnjara, 2020. "Government contracts and US bond yield spreads: A study on costs and benefits of materialized political connections," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 1059-1085, July.
    6. Çağatay Bircan & Orkun Saka, 2021. "Lending Cycles and Real Outcomes: Costs of Political Misalignment," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(639), pages 2763-2796.
    7. Léon, Florian, 2023. "Public bank lending in Africa in times of crisis," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    8. Janbaz, Mehdi & Hassan, M. Kabir & Floreani, Josanco & Dreassi, Alberto & Jiménez, Alfredo, 2022. "Political risk in banks: A review and agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    9. Ho, Chun-Yu & Huang, Shaoqing & Shi, Hao & Wu, Jun, 2018. "Financial deepening and innovation: The role of political institutions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Fan, Joseph P.H. & Rui, Oliver Meng & Zhao, Mengxin, 2008. "Public governance and corporate finance: Evidence from corruption cases," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 343-364, September.
    11. Manuel Illueca & Lars Norden & Gregory F. Udell, 2014. "Liberalization and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Government-Controlled Banks," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1217-1257.
    12. Doan, Anh-Tuan & Lin, Kun-Li, 2022. "Bank ownership and stock price informativeness. Does politics matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Yuan, Hongqi & Zhou, Yiyuan & Zou, Hong, 2022. "Serving multiple ‘masters’: Evidence from the loan decisions of a publicly listed state-owned bank around a massive economic stimulus programme11The authors can be contacted via yuanhq@fudan.edu.cn, y," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Hainz, Christa & Hakenes, Hendrik, 2012. "The politician and his banker — How to efficiently grant state aid," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 218-225.
    15. Ayyagari, Meghana & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Maksimovic, Vojislav, 2012. "Financing of firms in developing countries : lessons from research," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6036, The World Bank.
    16. Li, Kai & Yue, Heng & Zhao, Longkai, 2009. "Ownership, institutions, and capital structure: Evidence from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 471-490, September.
    17. Ibáñez-Hernández, Francisco J. & Peña-Cerezo, Miguel A. & Araujo-de-la-Mata, Andrés, 2019. "Corporate governance and procyclicality in a banking crisis: Empirical evidence and implications," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 271-275.
    18. Mirzaei, Ali & Pasiouras, Fotios & Samet, Anis, 2021. "State ownership, macroprudential policies, and bank lending," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    19. Galindo, Arturo & Micco, Alejandro, 2004. "Do state owned banks promote growth? Cross-country evidence for manufacturing industries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 371-376, September.
    20. Çağatay Bircan & Orkun Saka, 2021. "Lending Cycles and Real Outcomes: Costs of Political Misalignment," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(639), pages 2763-2796.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:75-4-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.