IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ökonomische Argumente für publizistischen Wettbwerb

Listed author(s):
  • Björn Frank

Some lines of economic reasoning do not produce clear-cut reasons why more competition in media markets would lead to better results. First, monopolistic media firms might have greater incentives to provide content variety. Second, their pricing policy might be untypical for monopolies because of their concern for effects in the advertising market. And third, there are probably secondary effects of advertising in the product markets, but without any prospect for definite judgments of welfare effects. In contrast, the final section presents a much more simple point: Media competition is desirable because it increases incentives for useful journalistic investigations. Die Wirkung des Wettbewerbs von Medienunternehmen auf das Marktergebnis ist in einigen einschlägigen Modellen durchaus ambivalent. So haben - erstens - monopolistische Anbieter unter Umständen höhere Anreize, ein breitgefächertes Angebot zu erstellen. Zweitens ist das typische Kalkül der Monopolpreissetzung in vielen Medienmärkten nicht anwendbar, da die Anbieter auch die Rückwirkungen der Lesermärkte auf die Werbemärkte berücksichtigen müssen. Drittens hat das Geschehen auf den Werbemärkten potentiell auch Einfluss auf die Märkte für die beworbenen Güter, aber die Wohlfahrtswirkungen sind hier völlig unklar. Ein vergleichsweise einfaches Argument mit klareren Schlussfolgerungen wird im letzten Abschnitt vorgeschlagen: Wettbewerb ist mit höheren Anreizen für einen investigativen Journalismus verbunden.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its journal Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung.

Volume (Year): 74 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 64-72

in new window

Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-8
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin

Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Stiglitz, Joseph E., 1989. "Imperfect information in the product market," Handbook of Industrial Organization,in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 13, pages 769-847 Elsevier.
  2. Duffy, Martyn, 1995. "Advertising in demand systems for alcoholic drinks and tobacco: A comparative study," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 557-577, December.
  3. George, Lisa, 2007. "What's fit to print: The effect of ownership concentration on product variety in daily newspaper markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 285-303, October.
  4. Anthony J. Dukes, 2005. "Economic Perspectives on Media Mergers and Consolidation," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(3), pages 38-48.
  5. Ralf Dewenter & Ulrich Kaiser, 2005. "Fusionen auf dem Printmedienmarkt aus wirtschaftspolitischer Sicht," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(3), pages 51-63.
  6. Vaidya, Samarth, 2005. "Corruption in the media's gaze," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 667-687, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:74-3-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.