IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v53y2025i30.html

Childhood left-behind experiences and premarital cohabitation: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Junhao Kou

    (Jilin University)

  • Yutong Li

    (Jilin University)

Abstract

Background: Premarital cohabitation has risen sharply in China, yet its structural childhood antecedents remain underexplored. Left-behind experiences due to parental migration provide a valuable research lens. Objective: We aim to investigate the association between childhood left-behind experiences and premarital cohabitation within the framework of life course theory and in the Chinese context, examining both the overall relationship and its variation by the timing of parental absence, parental migration type, and gender. Methods: We used data from wave 2010 and waves 2014–2022 of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), including 5,047 respondents born after 1978. We applied propensity score matching combined with logistic regression to address selection bias and estimate the effects. Results: Childhood left-behind experience is associated with higher odds of entering premarital cohabitation. The effect is strongest when parental absence occurs before age 3, remains positive for absences during ages 4–12, and is weaker when both periods are involved. By parental migration type, the differences across dual-parent, father-only, and mother-only absence are not pronounced. By contrast, gender heterogeneity is evident: left-behind men exhibit the highest odds of premarital cohabitation, substantially exceeding those of their female counterparts. Contribution: This study draws on institutionally shaped childhood experiences to offer a new lens for understanding entry into premarital cohabitation. In doing so, it advances the application of the life course perspective and underscores its relevance to transitional societies. By situating the Chinese case within global family scholarship, it also illustrates how institutional arrangements such as hukou and migration regimes generate distinct pathways into cohabitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhao Kou & Yutong Li, 2025. "Childhood left-behind experiences and premarital cohabitation: Evidence from China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(30), pages 969-1002.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:30
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/30/53-30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.30?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lydia Palumbo & Ann Berrington & Peter Eibich, 2025. "Living in precarious partnerships: Understanding how young men’s and women’s economic precariousness contribute to outcomes of first cohabitation," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(2), pages 253-281, May.
    2. Zhitong Gao & Jihong Pang & Hongyong Zhou, 2022. "The economics of marriage: Evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Jia Yu & Yu Xie, 2015. "Cohabitation in China: Trends and Determinants," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 41(4), pages 607-628, December.
    4. Ron J. Lesthaeghe & Lisa Neidert, 2006. "The Second Demographic Transition in the United States: Exception or Textbook Example?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 32(4), pages 669-698, December.
    5. Andrew Cherlin & Kathleen Kiernan & P. Chase-Lansdale, 1995. "Parental divorce in childhood and demographic outcomes in young adulthood," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 32(3), pages 299-318, August.
    6. Landaud, Fanny, 2021. "From employment to engagement? Stable jobs, temporary jobs, and cohabiting relationships," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Yeqing Huang & Huihui Gong, 2022. "Educational Expectations of Left-behind Children in China: Determinants and Gender Differences," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2501-2523, October.
    8. Dale Dannefer, 2003. "Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 58(6), pages 327-337.
    9. William Axinn & Arland Thornton, 1992. "The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 29(3), pages 357-374, August.
    10. Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Zhe Wang, Ben & Chen, Yuanyuan, 2021. "Childhood left-behind experience and labour market outcomes in China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 196-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mi Zhou & Lingsi Li & Li Huang, 2025. "The long-term impact of adolescent migration on the employment quality of Chinese rural migrant workers: the roles of education and multidimensional abilities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Roberto Impicciatore & Francesco C. Billari, 2012. "Secularization, Union Formation Practices, and Marital Stability: Evidence from Italy [Sécularisation, Pratiques de Mise en Union et Stabilité des Mariages: Le Cas de l’Italie]," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 28(2), pages 119-138, May.
    3. Martin Kreidl & Zuzana Žilinčíková, 2023. "Adult children’s union type and contact with mothers: A replication," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(23), pages 641-680.
    4. øystein Kravdal, 1997. "Wanting a Child Without a Firm Commitment to the Partner: Interpretations and Implications of a Common Behaviour Pattern among Norwegian Cohabitants," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 269-298, September.
    5. Kim Qinzi Xu, 2022. "Children and marital dissolution in China," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 233-255, June.
    6. David Pelletier, 2016. "The diffusion of cohabitation and children’s risks of family dissolution in Canada," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(45), pages 1317-1342.
    7. Sunnee Billingsley, 2010. "The Post-Communist Fertility Puzzle," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(2), pages 193-231, April.
    8. Riekhoff, Aart-Jan & Vaalavuo, Maria, 2021. "Health shocks and couples’ labor market participation: A turning point or stuck in the trajectory?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Jon Anson, 2010. "Beyond Material Explanations: Family Solidarity and Mortality, a Small Area‐level Analysis," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(1), pages 27-45, March.
    10. Sun, Nan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Impacts of internal migration experience on health among middle-aged and older adults—Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Song, Jieun & Mailick, Marsha R. & Greenberg, Jan S., 2018. "Health of parents of individuals with developmental disorders or mental health problems: Impacts of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 152-158.
    12. Jakub Bijak & Jason Hilton & Eric Silverman & Viet Dung Cao, 2013. "Reforging the Wedding Ring," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(27), pages 729-766.
    13. Judith A. Seltzer, 2019. "Family Change and Changing Family Demography," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(2), pages 405-426, April.
    14. Chen, Yuanyuan & Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2023. "Education and Migrant Health in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Wen, Le & Ali, Abdelrahman & Zhou, Zhipeng, 2026. "Rising housing rents and migrants' marriage formation: Evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Yasamin Kusunoki & Jennifer S. Barber, 2020. "The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(6), pages 2003-2034, December.
    17. Joanne S. Muller & Nicole Hiekel & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2020. "The Long-Term Costs of Family Trajectories: Women’s Later-Life Employment and Earnings Across Europe," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 1007-1034, June.
    18. Missinne, Sarah & Colman, Elien & Bracke, Piet, 2013. "Spousal influence on mammography screening: A life course perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 63-70.
    19. Brock Boudreau & Christiane Poulin, 2009. "An examination of the validity of the Family Affluence Scale II (FAS II) in a general adolescent population of Canada," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 29-42, October.
    20. Cheng, Zhiming & Guo, Liwen & Smyth, Russell & Tani, Massimiliano, 2022. "Childhood adversity and energy poverty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.