IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fserec/y2019p510-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Interaction on Eco Label Value Chain

Author

Listed:
  • George Bogdan Dragan

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Gianita Bleoju

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

The main aim of the paper is to expose the state of the art with methodological analysis conducted on digital interaction within online eco labelling value chain. The return on conceptual and experimental experience involves communities of European eco-label on-line retailers to deepen our knowledge about virtual configurations of sharing access to valuable information. The multiple case studies build upon collaborative experience within eco label chain to enlist strategic options about virtual platform of knowledge exchange. Various concerns arise when it comes to enable collective access to sharing eco retailer interaction with own customers due to cultural approach to openness and exposure to risk of shrinking future purchases. Virtual platform design has to facilitate open access to collaborative learning, making sense of digital interaction to discover patterns of future eco purchase behaviour among each company narrative. In the attempt to assist decision makers to interpret the perceived threats, cultural facilitators have to be explored to raise the awareness on eco retailing partnership about the benefits of variety in exploiting digital interaction return on experience. Companies needs guiding with understanding differences in trustfulness and exposure to risk of engaging in collectively sharing company experience in exchange of discovering future eco purchasing profile. Online retailing markets landscape of experimental learning will employ scenarios of matching eco purchasing profiling and retailer’s strategic options about eco future purchase behaviour. The main challenge to face on eco retailing business model concerns how to collectively employ predictive analytics tools to leverage customers’ eco behaviour propensity, while shaping own marketing intelligence tools to match eco value based engagement will strengthen each player’s competitive response. The digital interaction business model on eco label value chain provides facilitators of exposing marketing experience of each retailer in order to collectively engage in shaping and delivering customer experience to influence value based purchasing.

Suggested Citation

  • George Bogdan Dragan & Gianita Bleoju, 2019. "Digital Interaction on Eco Label Value Chain," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 510-514.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2019:p:510-514
    DOI: 10.35219/rce2067053260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rce.feaa.ugal.ro/images/stories/RCE2019/Dragan_Bleoju.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/rce2067053260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvius Stanciu & Cezar Bichescu & Alexandru Căpățînă & George-Bogdan Drăgan & Andrei-Mirel Florea, 2018. "Enablers and inhibitors of collaborative network development in organic food industry: A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    2. Friedrich Dornbusch & Thomas Brenner, 2013. "Universities as local knowledge hubs under different technology regimes – New evidence from academic patenting," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2013-10, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    3. Dornbusch, Friedrich & Brenner, Thomas, 2013. "Universities as local knowledge hubs under different technology regimes: New evidence from academic patenting," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R6/2013, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    4. Hubert Gatignon & Xavier Lecocq & Koen Pauwels & Alina Sorescu, 2017. "A marketing perspective on business models," Post-Print hal-01745312, HAL.
    5. Adrian Micu & Angela-Eliza Micu & Alexandru Capatina & Nicoleta Cristache & Bogdan George Dragan, 2018. "Market Intelligence Precursors for the Entrepreneurial Resilience Approach: The Case of the Romanian Eco-Label Product Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Hubert Gatignon & Xavier Lecocq & Koen Pauwels & Alina Sorescu, 2017. "A marketing perspective on business models," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(3), pages 85-89, December.
    7. Paul J. H. Schoemaker, 1993. "Strategic Decisions In Organizations: Rational And Behavioural Views," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 107-129, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2016. "Knowledge creation and dissemination by Kosetsushi in sectoral innovation systems: insights from patent data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 2303-2327, December.
    2. O. C. Ferrell, 2018. "Marketing’s identity crisis: it’s complicated," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(1), pages 30-38, June.
    3. FUKUGAWA Nobuya & GOTO Akira, 2016. "Problem Solving and Intermediation by Local Public Technology Centers in Regional Innovation Systems: The first report on a branch-level survey on technical consultation," Discussion papers 16062, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    4. Thomas Martin Key & Terry Clark & OC Ferrell & David W. Stewart & Leyland Pitt, 2020. "Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: opportunities to address marketing’s influence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 151-167, December.
    5. Czinkota, Michael & Kaufmann, Hans Rüdiger & Basile, Gianpaolo & Ferri, Maria Antonella, 2020. "For-Benefit Company (fBComp): An innovative social-business model. The Italian case," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 377-387.
    6. Manjit S. Yadav, 2019. "AMS Review: Progress toward a world-class journal dedicated to theory development," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-4, June.
    7. Nobuya Fukugawa, 2011. "Impacts and channels of university spillovers before the national innovation system reform in Japan," International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 383-393.
    8. FUKUGAWA Nobuya, 2016. "Knowledge Creation and Dissemination by Local Public Technology Centers in Regional and Sectoral Innovation Systems: Insights from patent data," Discussion papers 16061, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    9. Shinhye Kim & Melanie Bowen & Xiaohan (Hannah) Wen, 2019. "The ultimate co-creation: leveraging customer input in business model innovation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 339-356, December.
    10. Cloughton, Carol, 2020. "Investigating the link between innovation and mainstream adoption: How to identify consumer trends," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    11. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    12. Roger Moser & Srinath Rengarajan & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy, 2021. "Decision Intelligence: Creating a Fit between Intelligence Requirements and Intelligence Processing Capacities," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 160-177, July.
    13. Shahrun Nizam Abdul-Aziz & Normala Zulkifli & Norimah Rambeli@Ramli & Noor Al-Huda Abdul Karim & Zainizam Zakariya & Norasibah Abdul Jalil, 2019. "The Determinations of East Asia¡¯s Automobile Trade Using a Gravity Model," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(5), pages 113-128, December.
    14. Jeremy J. Sierra & Harry A. Taute, 2019. "Brand tribalism in technology and sport: determinants and outcomes," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 209-225, March.
    15. Mihaela Kardos & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Nicoleta Cristache, 2019. "Green Marketing’s Roles in Sustainability and Ecopreneurship. Case Study: Green Packaging’s Impact on Romanian Young Consumers’ Environmental Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    16. Bo Karlsson & Monika Kurkkio & Anders Hersinger, 2019. "The role of the controller in strategic capital investment projects: bridging the gap of multiple topoi," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 813-838, September.
    17. Lavinia-Andreea GRUIA & Alexandru ROJA & Nicolae BIBU & Marian NASTASE, 2021. "Education as the Main Entry Point in a Digitally Transformed Future of Work," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 155-167.
    18. Maria-Cristina STEFAN & Violeta-Andreea ANDREIANA & Irina Antoaneta TANASESCU & Georgiana STOICA, 2021. "Impact of Television Advertising on the Impulse to Purchase Over-the-Counter Medicine," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 149-154.
    19. Sener, Abdurrezzak & Barut, Mehmet & Oztekin, Asil & Avcilar, Mutlu Yuksel & Yildirim, Mehmet Bayram, 2019. "The role of information usage in a retail supply chain: A causal data mining and analytical modeling approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 87-104.
    20. Sa, Aida & Thollander, Patrik & Cagno, Enrico, 2017. "Assessing the driving factors for energy management program adoption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 538-547.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2019:p:510-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.