IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2021i3p12-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Ecologically Conscious are Millennials? A Study of Young Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Karamcheti BHARGAVI

    (K. J. Somaiya Institute of Management Studies & Research, Mumbai, India)

  • Gupta MEGHA

    (K. J. Somaiya Institute of Management Studies & Research, Mumbai, India)

  • Sharma KIRAN

    (K. J. Somaiya Institute of Management Studies & Research, Mumbai, India)

Abstract

Over the last few decades, the millennial generation have become a major segment in green marketing and have been identified for their pro-environmental attitudes. The current study explores the influencers (socialization agents) impacting the ecologically conscious consumer behavior (ECCB) of the millennials using the consumer socialization framework. For this purpose the impact of socio-structural variables (age, gender, education and family income), socialization agents (family and peers) and perceived consumer effectiveness (PCE) on environmental concern (EC) and ECCB has been studied in the Indian context.A sample of 325 millennials from a premier B-school was investigated through survey research method. Regression and mediation analyses, using PROCESS v 3.2, was administered to arrive at the results. Regression analysis confirmed the positive impact of perceived consumer effectiveness on ECCB. It also established the influence of socialization agents on environmental concern and ECCB of millennials. Further, mediation analyses revealed that, environmental concern mediated the relationship between family as a socialization agent and ECCB, while for peers it did not. In addition, environmental concern was established as a mediator between PCE and ECCB.The study confines itself to a sample of millennials from B-school background, and hence, may not be representative of the entire millennial generation. Among the socialization agents, the current study only considers family and peers in its framework, and remains silent on the evolving role of social media as an influencer.The findings have significant implications for both academicians and practitioners by highlighting the importance of social networks such as family and peers as channels of communication for effective implementation of marketers’ strategies.The current study contributes to the limited literature on millennials green buying behavior in the emerging market context. The applicability of the consumer socialization framework to collectivistic countries like India has been underexplored. Using this framework our study establishes the mediating role of environmental concern in the model. Further we have made an attempt to investigate the role of EC as a possible mediator between PCE and ECCB as it has been rarely explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Karamcheti BHARGAVI & Gupta MEGHA & Sharma KIRAN, 2021. "How Ecologically Conscious are Millennials? A Study of Young Consumers," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 12-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:3:p:12-21
    DOI: 10.35219/eai15840409218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2021_3/BhargaviMeghaKiran.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/eai15840409218?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hume, Margee, 2010. "Compassion without action: Examining the young consumers consumption and attitude to sustainable consumption," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 385-394, October.
    2. Hsieh, Yi-Ching & Chiu, Hung-Chang & Lin, Chia-Chi, 2006. "Family communication and parental influence on children's brand attitudes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1079-1086, October.
    3. Roberts, James A. & Bacon, Donald R., 1997. "Exploring the Subtle Relationships between Environmental Concern and Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 79-89, September.
    4. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Reiling, Stephen D., 2000. "Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values: a case study involving endangered species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 93-107, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefania Tonin & Diego Benedetto, 2024. "Exploring Sustainability Concerns and Ecosystem Services: The Role of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale in Understanding Public Opinion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Saari, Ulla A. & Damberg, Svenja & Frömbling, Lena & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. S.M. Fatah Uddin & Mohammed Naved Khan, 2016. "Green Purchasing Behaviour of Young Indian Consumers: An Exploratory Study," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(6), pages 1469-1479, December.
    4. Husted, Bryan W. & Russo, Michael V. & Meza, Carlos E. Basurto & Tilleman, Suzanne G., 2014. "An exploratory study of environmental attitudes and the willingness to pay for environmental certification in Mexico," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 891-899.
    5. Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla & María Del Carmen Reyes-Rodríguez & Luis Miguel López-Bonilla, 2018. "The Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours of European Golf Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Constantinos C. Manoli & Bruce Johnson & Sanlyn Buxner & Franz Bogner, 2019. "Measuring Environmental Perceptions Grounded on Different Theoretical Models: The 2-Major Environmental Values (2-MEV) Model in Comparison with the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Ho, Thi Thu & Huynh, Cong Minh, 2022. "Green Purchase Intention: An Investigation from Vietnamese Young Consumers," MPRA Paper 112355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Malin Jonell & Beatrice Crona & Kelsey Brown & Patrik Rönnbäck & Max Troell, 2016. "Eco-Labeled Seafood: Determinants for (Blue) Green Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Minh-Tri Ha, 2021. "Optimizing Green Brand Equity: The Integrated Branding and Behavioral Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    10. Achchuthan, S. & Velnampy, T., 2016. "A quest for green consumerism in Sri Lankan context: An application of comprehensive model," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(3), pages 59-76, March.
    11. Frederich Kirsten & Mduduzi Biyase, 2023. "Environmental perceptions and sustainable consumption behavior. The disparity among South Africans," Economics Working Papers edwrg-06-2023, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, revised 2023.
    12. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    13. Yanju Luo & Jinyang Deng & Chad Pierskalla & Ju-hyoung Lee & Jiayao Tang, 2022. "New Ecological Paradigm, Leisure Motivation, and Wellbeing Satisfaction: A Comparative Analysis of Recreational Use of Urban Parks before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    14. repec:sae:envval:v:11:y:2002:i:2:p:145-161 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Suresh Malodia & Alka Singh Bhatt, 2019. "Why Should I Switch Off: Understanding the Barriers to Sustainable Consumption?," Vision, , vol. 23(2), pages 134-143, June.
    16. Bandara, Ranjith & Tisdell, Clement A., 2003. "Use and non-use values of wild Asian elephants: A total economic valuation approach," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 48961, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    17. Williams, Ryan B. & Mitchell, Donna M. & Neill, Clinton L. & Benson, Aaron, 2015. "Household Willingness to Pay for Playa Restoration," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196917, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Tisdell, Clement A. & Wilson, Clevo & Swarna Nantha, Hemanath, 2004. "Comparative Public Support for Conserving Reptile Species is High: Australian Evidence and its Implications," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 51412, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    19. Chin†Huang Huang, 2017. "Estimating the environmental effects and recreational benefits of cultivated flower land for environmental quality improvement in Taiwan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(1), pages 29-39, January.
    20. Elena Druică & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Andreea-Ionela Puiu, 2023. "When Less Is More: Understanding the Adoption of a Minimalist Lifestyle Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    21. Carter, Kealy & Jayachandran, Satish & Murdock, Mitchel R., 2021. "Building A Sustainable Shelf: The Role of Firm Sustainability Reputation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 507-522.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:3:p:12-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.