IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jagaec/v20y1988i02p127-136_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factor Demands of Louisiana Rice Producers: An Econometric Investigation

Author

Listed:
  • McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E.
  • Okunade, Albert Ade.

Abstract

A Diewert-flexible (dual) cost function was used to derive a system of conditional factor demand equations for Louisiana rice producers. Generalized Leontief cost and factor share equations were fitted for the 1955-87 period using Zellner's SURE system estimation procedure. The Aitken parameter estimates reveal that: (1) the optimal input mix of rice farmers varies with production scale, (2) the factor-augmenting technical change is labor and chemical saving but seed using, (3) pairwise input substitutions are limited, and (4) factor demands are own-price inelastic. An implication is that Louisiana rice farmers will not appreciably alter their factor utilizations when relative input prices change.

Suggested Citation

  • McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Okunade, Albert Ade., 1988. "Factor Demands of Louisiana Rice Producers: An Econometric Investigation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 127-136, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:20:y:1988:i:02:p:127-136_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0081305200017672/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rulon D. Pope, 1984. "Estimating Functional Forms with Special Reference to Agriculture: Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(2), pages 223-224.
    2. Barnett, William A. & Lee, Yul W. & Wolfe, Michael D., 1985. "The three-dimensional global properties of the minflex laurent, generalized leontief, and translog flexible functional forms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 3-31.
    3. Theodore P. Lianos, 1971. "The Relative Share of Labor in United States Agriculture, 1949–1968," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(3), pages 411-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karagiannis, Giannis & Katranidis, Stelios & Velentzas, Kostas, 1996. "Decomposition Analysis of Factor Cost Shares: The Case of Greek Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 369-379, December.
    2. Baffes, John, 1989. "Factor Demands of Louisiana Rice Producers: An Econometric Investigation: Comment," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 221-222, December.
    3. McLean-Meyinsse, Patricia E. & Okunade, Albert Ade., 1989. "Factor Demands of Louisiana Rice Producers: An Econometric Investigation: Reply," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 223-224, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    2. Denis Conniffe, 2006. "Indirect addilog translation of indirect utility functions," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 1388-1397, November.
    3. Manthos D. Delis & K. Christos Staikouras & Panagiotis T. Varlagas, 2008. "On the Measurement of Market Power in the Banking Industry," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(7‐8), pages 1023-1047, September.
    4. Moschini, GianCarlo & Vissa, Anuradha, 1992. "A Linear Inverse Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Chalfant, James & Wallace, Nancy, 1991. "Testing the Translog Specification with the Fourier Cost Function," CUDARE Working Papers 198581, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Apostolos Serletis & Libo Xu, 2020. "Demand systems with heteroscedastic disturbances," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1913-1921, April.
    7. Soest, Arthur van & Kapteyn, Arie & Kooreman, Peter, 1993. "Coherency and regularity of demand systems with equality and inequality constraints," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1-3), pages 161-188.
    8. Eldon V. Ball & Ricardo Cavazos & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Rulon Pope & Jesse Tack, 2010. "Aggregation and Arbitrage in Joint Production," Monash Economics Working Papers archive-22, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    9. Woo, C.K. & Liu, Y. & Zarnikau, J. & Shiu, A. & Luo, X. & Kahrl, F., 2018. "Price elasticities of retail energy demands in the United States: New evidence from a panel of monthly data for 2001–2016," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 460-474.
    10. William A. Barnett & Neepa B. Gaekwad, 2018. "The Demand for Money for EMU: a Flexible Functional Form Approach," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 353-371, April.
    11. Henri-Bertrand Lefer & Hana Blaskovic, 1994. "Les modèles de simulation technico-economiques comme méthode d'analyse des différentes politiques agricoles," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 224(1), pages 45-51.
    12. Jin, Man, 2018. "Measuring substitution in China's monetary-assets demand system," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 117-132.
    13. LaFrance, Jeffrey T., 2008. "The structure of US food demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 336-349, December.
    14. Binswanger, Hans P, 1974. "The Measurement of Technical Change Biases with Many Factors of Production," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(6), pages 964-976, December.
    15. Douglas Fisher & Adrian R. Fleissig & Apostolos Serletis, 2006. "An Empirical Comparison of Flexible Demand System Functional Forms," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Money And The Economy, chapter 13, pages 247-277, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Chalfant, James & White, Kenneth, 1987. "Estimation and Testing in Demand Systems with Concavity Constraints," CUDARE Working Papers 198466, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    17. GianCarlo Moschini, 2001. "A Flexible Multistage Demand System Based on Indirect Separability," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(1), pages 22-41, July.
    18. Marijn Verschelde & Michel Dumont & Glenn Rayp & Bruno Merlevede, 2016. "Semiparametric stochastic metafrontier efficiency of European manufacturing firms," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 53-69, February.
    19. Stoker, Thomas M., 1996. "Smoothing bias in the measurement of marginal effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1-2), pages 49-84.
    20. Keith R. McLaren & Ou Yang, 2014. "A Class of Demand Systems Satisfying Global Regularity and Having Complete Rank Flexibility," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 6/14, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jagaec:v:20:y:1988:i:02:p:127-136_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/aae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.