IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/019969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversidad económica regional y desempeno socioeconómico en las provincias del Ecuador (período 2014-2018)

Author

Listed:
  • Rodríguez, Wilson Santiago Izquierdo

    (Universidad Católica de Cuenca)

  • Velecela, PaolaAlexandra Carangui

    (Universidad Católica de Cuenca)

Abstract

El presente artículo tiene como objetivo estimar el efecto de la diversidad económica regional sobre las condiciones socioeconómicas en las provincias del Ecuador, tomando como referencia el período 2014-2018. La investigación es de tipo explicativa, con diseno documental, no experimental, transversal y emplea como métodos de análisis los enfoques analítico-sintético y cuantitativo-empírico. Las estimaciones econométricas efectuadas con datos de corte transversal de las 24 provincias del Ecuador, con el método de Mínimos Cuadrados Ordinarios, sugieren efectos positivos del coeficiente de especialización regional y del índice de concentración sobre la volatilidad observada en el ingreso y en el crecimiento. Así mismo, la especialización regional se asocia con una mayor tasa de pobreza, mientras que hay una relación inversa entre especialización y concentración con la tasa promedio de crecimiento de las provincias. El estudio permitió concluir, en primer lugar, que la planificación del desarrollo exige la reducción de las heterogeneidades productivas que presenta una economía como Ecuador y, en segundo lugar, que los beneficios del desarrollo sólo serán ampliamente percibidos por la población en la medida que las regiones diversifican su actividad económica. ****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************** This article aims to estimate the effect of regional economic diversity on socioeconomic conditions in the provinces of Ecuador, taking as a reference the period 2014-2018. The research is explanatory, with a documentary, non-experimental, cross-sectional design, and uses analytical-synthetic and quantitative-empirical approaches as analysis methods. Econometric estimates made with cross-sectional data from the 24 provinces of Ecuador, using the Ordinary Least Squares method, suggest positive effects of theregional specialization coefficient and the concentration index on the volatility observed in income and growth. Likewise, regional specialization is associated with a higher poverty rate, while there is an inverse relationship between specialization and concentration with the average growth rate of the provinces. The study allowed to conclude, firstly, that development planning requires the reduction of the productive heterogeneities that an economy such as Ecuador presents and, secondly, that the benefits of development will only be widely perceived by the population to the extent that the regions diversify their economic activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodríguez, Wilson Santiago Izquierdo & Velecela, PaolaAlexandra Carangui, 2022. "Diversidad económica regional y desempeno socioeconómico en las provincias del Ecuador (período 2014-2018)," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(1), pages 87-116, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:019969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.udenar.edu.co/index.php/rtend/article/view/7075
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romer, Paul M, 1986. "Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(5), pages 1002-1037, October.
    2. Prebisch, Raúl, 1950. "The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 29973, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1998. "What's New about the New Economic Geography?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 7-17, Summer.
    4. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    5. -, 2006. "Fernando Fajnzylber: una visión renovadora del desarrollo en América Latina," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2458 edited by Cepal, May.
    6. Wagner, John E., 2000. "Regional Economic Diversity: Action, Concept, or State of Confusion," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-22.
    7. Fajnzylber, Fernando, 1983. "La industrialización trunca de América Latina," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 43130 edited by Editorial Nueva Imagen.
    8. Gerhard K. Heilig, 2006. "Many Chinas? The Economic Diversity of China's Provinces," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 32(1), pages 147-161, March.
    9. del Campo, Cristina & Monteiro, Carlos M.F. & Soares, Joao Oliveira, 2008. "The European regional policy and the socio-economic diversity of European regions: A multivariate analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 600-612, June.
    10. Douglass C. North, 1955. "Location Theory and Regional Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 63(3), pages 243-243.
    11. Valerien O. Pede, 2013. "Diversity And Regional Economic Growth: Evidence From Us Counties," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 38(3), pages 111-127, September.
    12. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sinesipho Siswana & Andrew Phiri, 2021. "Is Export Diversification or Export Specialization Responsible for Economic Growth in BRICS Countries?," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 243-261, May.
    2. Thomas Ziesemer, 2018. "Testing the Growth Links of Emerging Economies: Croatia in a Growing World Economy," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27.
    3. Osvaldo Lagares, 2016. "Capital, Economic Growth and Relative Income Differences in Latin America," Discussion Papers 16/03, Department of Economics, University of York.
    4. Aykut Kibritçioglu, 2002. "On the Smithian origins of "new" trade and growth theories," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15.
    5. Feijó, Carmem Aparecida & Araújo, Eliane & Nassif, André, 2017. "A structuralist-Keynesian model for determining the optimum real exchange rate for Brazil’s economic development process: 1999-2015," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    6. Alejandro Díaz-Bautista, 2003. "Convergence And Economic Growth Considering Human Capital And R&D Spillovers," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 2(2), pages 127-143, Junio 200.
    7. Andrey A. GNIDCHENKO, 2011. "Defragmentation Of Economic Growth With A Focus On Diversification: Evidence From Russian Economy," Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 0(1), pages 45-85, June.
    8. Ben-David, Dan & Loewy, Michael B, 1998. "Free Trade, Growth, and Convergence," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 143-170, June.
    9. Young Ademola Obafemi, 2022. "Specialization Versus Diversification as Alternative Strategies for Sustainable Growth in Resource-Rich Developing Countries. Case of Nigeria," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(3), pages 1-47, September.
    10. Roberto Veneziani & Luca Zamparelli & Amitava Krishna Dutt, 2017. "Heterodox Theories Of Economic Growth And Income Distribution: A Partial Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1240-1271, December.
    11. Andrey GNIDCHENKO, 2011. "Defragmentation Of Economic Growth With A Focus On Diversification: Evidence From Russian Economy," Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 44-80.
    12. Pender, John L. & Marre, Alexander W. & Reeder, Richard J., 2012. "Rural Wealth Creation Concepts, Strategies, and Measures," Economic Research Report 121860, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Romano, Donato, 1996. "ENDOGENOUS RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY: A EUROPEAN (NON ORTHODOX) PERSPECTIVE; Proceedings of the Fifth Joint Conference on Agriculture, Food, and the Environment, June 17-18, 1996, Padova, I," Working Papers 14396, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    14. Jarrín-V, Pablo & Falconí, Fander & Cango, Pedro & Ramos-Martin, Jesus, 2021. "Knowledge gaps in Latin America and the Caribbean and economic development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Afolabi Tunde Ahmed & Tsimisaraka Raymondo Sandra Marcelline & Sabi Couscous Mouhamadou Nazirou, 2021. "Empirical Study of the Impact of Governance on Economic Structural Change: Evidence from Sub-Saharan African Countries," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 5(8), pages 260-277.
    16. Robert J. Stimson & Roger R. Stough & Tung-Kai Shyy & Chunpu Song, 2014. "Differentials in endogenous regional employment growth in US metropolitan areas: the role of entrepreneurship and other leadership and institutional factors," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Agglomeration, Clusters and Entrepreneurship, chapter 2, pages 16-51, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Gnidchenko, Andrey, 2011. "Моделирование Технологических И Институциональных Эффектов В Макроэкономическом Прогнозировании [Technological and Institutional Effects Modeling in Macroeconomic Forecasting]," MPRA Paper 35484, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2011.
    18. Navarrete Gallo, Pamela L. & Ritzen, Jo, 2021. "Do institutions and ideology matter for economic growth in Latin America in the first two decades of the 21st century?," MERIT Working Papers 2021-012, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Alejandro Diaz-Bautista, 2005. "Convergence and Economic Growth considering Human Capital and R&D Spillovers Convergencia y Crecimiento Economico en Mexico considerando al Capital Humano y derrames en Investigacion y Desarrollo," Urban/Regional 0506012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Terheggen, Anne, 2010. "The new kid in the forest: the impact of China's resource demand on Gabon's tropical timber value chain," MPRA Paper 37982, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    concentración económica; desarrollo económico; desarrollo regional; estructura económica; geografía económica;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:019969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.