IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Social polarization and conflict: A network approach

  • Ernesto Cárdenas

    ()

Registered author(s):

    Theoretically, polarization is associated with a higher probability of social conflict. This paper, in a microeconomic model based on the theory of social networks, analyses how changes in the network’s structure affect the level of some basic parameters associated with the concept of polarization. This study shows that under upward monotonic preferences, longer sets of affiliations for each individual reduce polarization, whereas under downward monotonic preferences, longer sets of the so-called bad affiliations increase polarization. Finally, in the case of a non-monotonic system of preferences, an expansion of the affiliations set will alter the resulting polarization order in different ways depending on the preferences themselves. ***** En la teoría, la polarización se asocia con una mayor probabilidad de conflicto social. Este artículo analiza, dentro de un modelo microeconómico basado en la teoría de redes sociales, cómo los cambios en la estructura de la red afectan el nivel de algunos parámetros básicos asociados con el concepto de polarización. También muestra que bajo preferencias monótonas crecientes, la existencia de conjuntos más largos de afiliaciones para cada individuo reduce la polarización, mientras que, bajo preferencias monótonas decrecientes, los conjuntos más largos de las llamadas malas afiliaciones aumentan la polarización. Por último, en el caso de un sistema no monótono de preferencias, una expansión del conjunto de afiliaciones alterará el orden resultante de polarización de diferentes maneras, dependiendo de las preferencias mismas. ***** En théorie, la polarisation est associée à une plus grande probabilité de conflit social. Cet article analyse, dans un modèle microéconomique basé sur la théorie des réseaux sociaux, la manière dont les changements dans la structure du réseau affectent le niveau de certains paramètres de base associés au concept de polarisation. Cette étude montre que, avec des préférences monotones croissantes, l’existence d’ensembles plus longs d’affiliations pour chaque individu réduit la polarisation tandis que, avec des préférences monotones décroissantes, les ensembles plus longs de ce qu’on appelle des mauvaises affiliations augmentent la polarisation. Enfin, dans le cas d’un système non monotone de préférences, une expansion de l’ensemble d’affiliations altèrera l’ordre résultant de polarisation de différentes manières, selon les préférences elles-mêmes.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/documentos/Cuadernos/61/finales/v32n61a06.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by UN - RCE - CID in its journal REVISTA CUADERNOS DE ECONOMÍA.

    Volume (Year): (2013)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages:

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:col:000093:011075
    Contact details of provider:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Joan-Maria Esteban & Debraj Ray, 1991. "On the Measurement of Polarization," Boston University - Institute for Economic Development 18, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
    2. Leonardo Gasparini & Matias Horenstein & Ezequiel Molina & Sergio Olivieri, 2008. "Income Polarization in Latin America: Patterns and Links with Institutions and Conflict," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 461-484.
    3. Esteban, Joan & Ray, Debraj, 1999. "Conflict and Distribution," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 379-415, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000093:011075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vladimir Leonardo Celis Agudelo)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.