IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i4p65-78.html

Assessing Threats and Conservation Status of Historical Centers of Oak Richness in California

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Jane Easterday

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Berkeley, USA)

  • Patrick J McIntyre

    (Biogeographic Data Branch, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, USA)

  • James H Thorne

    (Department Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, USA)

  • Maria J Santos

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Maggi Kelly

    (Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Berkeley, USA)

Abstract

Oak trees are emblematic of California landscapes, they serve as keystone cultural and ecological species and as indicators of natural biological diversity. As historically undeveloped landscapes are increasingly converted to urban environments, endemic oak woodland extent is reduced, which underscores the importance of strategic placement and reintroduction of oaks and woodland landscape for the maintenance of biodiversity and reduction of habitat fragmentation. This paper investigated the effects of human urban development on oak species in California by first modeling historical patterns of richness for eight oak tree species using historical map and plot data from the California Vegetation Type Mapping (VTM) collection. We then examined spatial intersections between hot spots of historical oak richness and modern urban and conservation lands and found that impacts from development and conservation vary by both species and richness. Our findings suggest that the impact of urban development on oaks has been small within the areas of highest oak richness but that areas of highest oak richness are also poorly conserved. Third, we argue that current policy measures are inadequate to conserve oak woodlands and suggest regions to prioritize acquisition of conservation lands as well as examine urban regions where historic centers of oak richness were lost as potential frontiers for oak reintroduction. We argue that urban planning could benefit from the adoption of historical data and modern species distribution modelling techniques primarily used in natural resources and conservation fields to better locate hot spots of species richness, understand where habitats and species have been lost historically and use this evidence as incentive to recover what was lost and preserve what still exists. This adoption of historical data and modern techniques would then serve as a paradigm shift in the way Urban Planners recognize, quantify, and use landscape history in modern built environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Jane Easterday & Patrick J McIntyre & James H Thorne & Maria J Santos & Maggi Kelly, 2016. "Assessing Threats and Conservation Status of Historical Centers of Oak Richness in California," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 65-78.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:65-78
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i4.726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/726
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i4.726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher J. Raxworthy & Enrique Martinez-Meyer & Ned Horning & Ronald A. Nussbaum & Gregory E. Schneider & Miguel A. Ortega-Huerta & A. Townsend Peterson, 2003. "Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6968), pages 837-841, December.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0065258 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    4. Karen C Seto & Michail Fragkias & Burak Güneralp & Michael K Reilly, 2011. "A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-9, August.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0103489 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Jane Easterday & Patrick J McIntyre & James H Thorne & Maria J Santos & Maggi Kelly, 2016. "Assessing Threats and Conservation Status of Historical Centers of Oak Richness in California," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 65-78.
    2. Onyango Dancan O. & Ikporukpo Christopher O. & Taiwo John O. & Opiyo Stephen B., 2021. "Monitoring the extent and impacts of watershed urban development in the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya, using a combination of population dynamics, remote sensing and GIS techniques," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 11-25, June.
    3. Hammad Gilani & Sohail Ahmad & Waqas Ahmed Qazi & Syed Muhammad Abubakar & Murtaza Khalid, 2020. "Monitoring of Urban Landscape Ecology Dynamics of Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT), Pakistan, Over Four Decades (1976–2016)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Susca, T. & Zanghirella, F. & Colasuonno, L. & Del Fatto, V., 2022. "Effect of green wall installation on urban heat island and building energy use: A climate-informed systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Lei, Weiqian & Jiao, Limin & Xu, Gang, 2022. "Understanding the urban scaling of urban land with an internal structure view to characterize China’s urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Yang Zhang & Yanfang Liu & Yan Zhang & Xuesong Kong & Ying Jing & Enxiang Cai & Lingyu Zhang & Yi Liu & Zhengyu Wang & Yaolin Liu, 2019. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Forces of Conflicts among the Three Land Management Red Lines in China: A Case Study of the Wuhan Urban Development Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Andrea Pravitasari & Izuru Saizen & Narumasa Tsutsumida & Ernan Rustiadi & Didit Pribadi, 2015. "Local Spatially Dependent Driving Forces of Urban Expansion in an Emerging Asian Megacity: The Case of Greater Jakarta (Jabodetabek)," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(1), pages 108-108, January.
    8. Peterson, A. Townsend & Papeş, Monica & Soberón, Jorge, 2008. "Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 63-72.
    9. Lucia Saganeiti & Lorena Fiorini & Francesco Zullo & Beniamino Murgante, 2024. "Urban dispersion indicator to assess the Italian settlement pattern," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(6), pages 1322-1337, July.
    10. Mialhe, François & Gunnell, Yanni & Navratil, Oldrich & Choi, Daniel & Sovann, Chansopheaktra & Lejot, Jérôme & Gaudou, Benoît & Se, Bunleng & Landon, Norbert, 2019. "Spatial growth of Phnom Penh, Cambodia (1973–2015): Patterns, rates, and socio-ecological consequences," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Wu, Ye & Tao, Yu & Yang, Guishan & Ou, Weixin & Pueppke, Steven & Sun, Xiao & Chen, Gongtai & Tao, Qin, 2019. "Impact of land use change on multiple ecosystem services in the rapidly urbanizing Kunshan City of China: Past trajectories and future projections," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 419-427.
    12. Wei Song & Xiangzheng Deng, 2015. "Effects of Urbanization-Induced Cultivated Land Loss on Ecosystem Services in the North China Plain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Yang, Fei & Liu, Kang & Wu, Lei & Ren, Yi & Liang, Tian, 2025. "Urban geometry and energy efficiency: Evidence from 282 cities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    14. Jing Zhen & Xinyuan Wang & Qingkai Meng & Jingwei Song & Ying Liao & Bo Xiang & Huadong Guo & Chuansheng Liu & Ruixia Yang & Lei Luo, 2018. "Fine-Scale Evaluation of Giant Panda Habitats and Countermeasures against the Future Impacts of Climate Change and Human Disturbance (2015–2050): A Case Study in Ya’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Ke Huang & Martin Dallimer & Lindsay C. Stringer & Anlu Zhang & Ting Zhang, 2021. "Does Economic Agglomeration Lead to Efficient Rural to Urban Land Conversion? An Examination of China’s Metropolitan Area Development Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Lyu, Rongfang & Zhang, Jianming & Xu, Mengqun & Li, Jijun, 2018. "Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations: A case study in Northern Ningxia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 163-173.
    17. Tao Lin & Yunjun Yu & Xuemei Bai & Ling Feng & Jin Wang, 2013. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting of Urban Residential Consumption: A Household Survey Based Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Yaolin Liu & Xuesong Kong & Yanfang Liu & Yiyun Chen, 2013. "Simulating the Conversion of Rural Settlements to Town Land Based on Multi-Agent Systems and Cellular Automata," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Kukkonen, M.O. & Khamis, M. & Muhammad, M.J. & Käyhkö, N. & Luoto, M., 2022. "Modeling direct above-ground carbon loss due to urban expansion in Zanzibar City Region, Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    20. Kukkonen, Markus O. & Muhammad, Muhammad J. & Käyhkö, Niina & Luoto, Miska, 2018. "Urban expansion in Zanzibar City, Tanzania: Analyzing quantity, spatial patterns and effects of alternative planning approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 554-565.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:65-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.