IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v320y2016icp372-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using one vs. many, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of species distribution models with focus on conservation area networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ochoa-Ochoa, Leticia M.
  • Flores-Villela, Oscar A.
  • Bezaury-Creel, Juan E.

Abstract

Species Distribution Models (SDM) are currently common currency as proxies of species distribution range, and using consensus among different algorithms is becoming the latest tendency. This information is frequently used to estimate conservation status or for conservation planning. Nonetheless, different algorithms have huge variation in the outcomes. Usually experts determine whether or not a model is accurate, often followed by a trimming process. However, this accuracy estimation cannot be reproduced. Using Mexican endemic amphibians we evaluate the performance of nine modelling algorithms (Artificial Neural Networks, Classification Tree Analysis, Flexible Discriminant Analysis, Generalised Boosting Model, Generalised Linear Models, Multiple Adaptive Regression Splines, MaxEnt, RandomForest, Surface Range Envelope), their strict geographic consensus, locality records and simple convex-hull areas through comparison of: (1) their presence/absence within Mexico's governmental protected areas, (2) range sizes projected, and (3) differences in estimated richness by all methods. We conducted all good practices prior modelling but removed the trimming factor after modelling to make the process repeatable. Presence–absence threshold was determined through the use of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC). Presence within conservation network of strict consensus and locality records was similar which indicates an over-fitting of the former, the rest of the algorithms performed similarly, with exception of Surface Range Envelope. Richness patterns varied greatly among algorithms. Distribution borders were the areas with higher sensitivity. MaxEnt obtained the highest performance in omission but consensus performed best in correctly predicting species ranges. Closer interaction between curators and modelers would increase SDMs accuracy, which would improve conservation planning effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ochoa-Ochoa, Leticia M. & Flores-Villela, Oscar A. & Bezaury-Creel, Juan E., 2016. "Using one vs. many, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of species distribution models with focus on conservation area networks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 372-382.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:372-382
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380015005165
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ross A. Alford & Kay S. Bradfield & Stephen J. Richards, 2007. "Global warming and amphibian losses," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7144), pages 3-4, May.
    2. Richard G. Pearson & Jessica C. Stanton & Kevin T. Shoemaker & Matthew E. Aiello-Lammens & Peter J. Ersts & Ned Horning & Damien A. Fordham & Christopher J. Raxworthy & Hae Yeong Ryu & Jason McNees & , 2014. "Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 217-221, March.
    3. Ana S. L. Rodrigues & Sandy J. Andelman & Mohamed I. Bakarr & Luigi Boitani & Thomas M. Brooks & Richard M. Cowling & Lincoln D. C. Fishpool & Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca & Kevin J. Gaston & Michael Hoff, 2004. "Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 640-643, April.
    4. Christopher J. Raxworthy & Enrique Martinez-Meyer & Ned Horning & Ronald A. Nussbaum & Gregory E. Schneider & Miguel A. Ortega-Huerta & A. Townsend Peterson, 2003. "Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6968), pages 837-841, December.
    5. C. R. Margules & R. L. Pressey, 2000. "Systematic conservation planning," Nature, Nature, vol. 405(6783), pages 243-253, May.
    6. Barve, Narayani & Barve, Vijay & Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto & Lira-Noriega, Andrés & Maher, Sean P. & Peterson, A. Townsend & Soberón, Jorge & Villalobos, Fabricio, 2011. "The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(11), pages 1810-1819.
    7. Rodríguez-Rey, Marta & Jiménez-Valverde, Alberto & Acevedo, Pelayo, 2013. "Species distribution models predict range expansion better than chance but not better than a simple dispersal model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 1-5.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. An T. N. Dang & Lalit Kumar & Michael Reid, 2020. "Modelling the Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Rice Cultivation in Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chunrong Mi & Liang Ma & Mengyuan Yang & Xinhai Li & Shai Meiri & Uri Roll & Oleksandra Oskyrko & Daniel Pincheira-Donoso & Lilly P. Harvey & Daniel Jablonski & Barbod Safaei-Mahroo & Hanyeh Ghaffari , 2023. "Global Protected Areas as refuges for amphibians and reptiles under climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Weerasena, Lakmali & Shier, Douglas & Tonkyn, David & McFeaters, Mark & Collins, Christopher, 2023. "A sequential approach to reserve design with compactness and contiguity considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    3. Eliška Fňukalová & Vladimír Zýka & Dušan Romportl, 2021. "The Network of Green Infrastructure Based on Ecosystem Services Supply in Central Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Herkt, K. Matthias B. & Barnikel, Günter & Skidmore, Andrew K. & Fahr, Jakob, 2016. "A high-resolution model of bat diversity and endemism for continental Africa," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 9-28.
    5. Pimenta, Mayra & Andrade, André Felipe Alves de & Fernandes, Fernando Hiago Souza & Amboni, Mayra Pereira de Melo & Almeida, Renata Silva & Soares, Ana Hermínia Simões de Bello & Falcon, Guth Berger &, 2022. "One size does not fit all: Priority areas for real world problems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 470(C).
    6. Carlos Yañez-Arenas & A Townsend Peterson & Pierre Mokondoko & Octavio Rojas-Soto & Enrique Martínez-Meyer, 2014. "The Use of Ecological Niche Modeling to Infer Potential Risk Areas of Snakebite in the Mexican State of Veracruz," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-9, June.
    7. Holloway, Paul & Miller, Jennifer A., 2017. "A quantitative synthesis of the movement concepts used within species distribution modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 356(C), pages 91-103.
    8. Brice X Semmens & Peter J Auster & Michelle J Paddack, 2010. "Using Ecological Null Models to Assess the Potential for Marine Protected Area Networks to Protect Biodiversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, January.
    9. Haider, Zulqarnain & Charkhgard, Hadi & Kwon, Changhyun, 2018. "A robust optimization approach for solving problems in conservation planning," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 288-297.
    10. Sebastián Cordero & Gabriel J. Castaño-Villa & Francisco E. Fontúrbel, 2020. "The Best Bang for the Bucks: Rethinking Global Investment in Biodiversity Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Lissa M Barr & Robert L Pressey & Richard A Fuller & Daniel B Segan & Eve McDonald-Madden & Hugh P Possingham, 2011. "A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-4, September.
    12. Drielsma, Michael & Ferrier, Simon & Howling, Gary & Manion, Glenn & Taylor, Subhashni & Love, Jamie, 2014. "The Biodiversity Forecasting Toolkit: Answering the ‘how much’, ‘what’, and ‘where’ of planning for biodiversity persistence," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 274(C), pages 80-91.
    13. Conceição, Eliezer O. & Garcia, Jéssica Magon & Alves, Gustavo Henrique Zaia & Delanira-Santos, Driele & Corbetta, Daiany de Fátima & Betiol, Tânia Camila Crivelari & Pacifico, Ricardo & Romagnolo, Ma, 2022. "The impact of downsizing protected areas: How a misguided policy may enhance landscape fragmentation and biodiversity loss," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0026786 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rahul Raveendran Nair & Yoshinori Nakazawa & A Townsend Peterson, 2024. "An evaluation of the ecological niche of Orf virus ( Poxviridae ): Challenges of distinguishing broad niches from no niches," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Kangas, Johanna & Ollikainen, Markku, 2022. "A PES scheme promoting forest biodiversity and carbon sequestration," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    17. Tamara S. Wilson & Benjamin M. Sleeter & Rachel R. Sleeter & Christopher E. Soulard, 2014. "Land-Use Threats and Protected Areas: A Scenario-Based, Landscape Level Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Alsamadisi, Adam G. & Tran, Liem T. & Papeş, Monica, 2020. "Employing inferences across scales: Integrating spatial data with different resolutions to enhance Maxent models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 415(C).
    19. Bernard W T Coetzee & Kevin J Gaston & Steven L Chown, 2014. "Local Scale Comparisons of Biodiversity as a Test for Global Protected Area Ecological Performance: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    20. Auriel M. V. Fournier & R. Randy Wilson & Jeffrey S. Gleason & Evan M. Adams & Janell M. Brush & Robert J. Cooper & Stephen J. DeMaso & Melanie J. L. Driscoll & Peter C. Frederick & Patrick G. R. Jodi, 2023. "Structured Decision Making to Prioritize Regional Bird Monitoring Needs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 207-217, May.
    21. Wang, Haoluan, 2017. "Land Conservation for Open Space: The Impact of Neighbors and the Natural Environment," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258125, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:320:y:2016:i:c:p:372-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.