IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a10077.html

How European Do Young Slovenians Feel?

Author

Listed:
  • Meta Novak

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Damjan Lajh

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

The last two decades of European integration have been challenging for European identity for various reasons. First, the 2004 and subsequent enlargement (in 2007 and 2013) of the EU to Central and Eastern Europe have further extended the diversity of the integration. Second, concerns with European identity have become even stronger as the EU has faced a permanent period of crisis. Third, the growing populism and authoritative politics in Europe are responsible for further differentiation and growing instability across the EU. Addressing the problem of European identity is thus inevitable. The goal of the EU is to build a collective European identity that helps reinforce integration via either the cultural dimension coordinated on the EU level, aimed at establishing a common European sense of belonging while complementing national, regional, and local identities, or the activities of various EU projects that support European ideas and values. In this article, we consider the presence and robustness of a European identity as a civic and cultural component among the citizens most directly involved in European projects that seek to add to it: elementary school students. The analysis is based on a survey conducted among Slovenian elementary school students who had participated in EU‐related project activities. Students’ self‐assessment of their European identity and associated variables were measured before and after those activities. Our assumption is that participation in the project activities bolstered the students’ European identity. The results show that the students already expressed a high level of European identity prior to the project activities, leaving little room for a stronger identity, which nevertheless speaks in favour of making sure that EU‐related topics have a permanent place in the educational process.

Suggested Citation

  • Meta Novak & Damjan Lajh, 2025. "How European Do Young Slovenians Feel?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10077
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.10077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/10077
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.10077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobolt, Sara B. & de Vries, Catherine E., 2016. "Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66831, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Iain Wilson, 2011. "What Should We Expect of ‘Erasmus Generations’?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 1113-1140, September.
    3. Thomas Christiansen, 2020. "The EU's New Normal: Consolidating European Integration in an Era of Populism and Geo‐Economics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(S1), pages 13-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristina López-Duarte & Jane F. Maley & Marta M. Vidal-Suárez, 2021. "Main challenges to international student mobility in the European arena," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 8957-8980, November.
    2. Mikko Mattila & Tapio Raunio, 2026. "Still Out of Touch? Parties and Their Voters on the EU Dimension," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    3. Daniela Braun & Markus Tausendpfund, 2020. "Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 28-40.
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1divsbu8t888r9vqektjbmlqoa is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Yann Algan & Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou & Evgenia Passari, 2017. "The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(2 (Fall)), pages 309-400.
    6. Aleberto Alesina & Guido Tabellini & Francesco Trebbi, 2017. "Is Europe an Optimal Political Area?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 169-234.
    7. Stefano Camatarri & Francesco Zucchini, 2019. "Government coalitions and Eurosceptic voting in the 2014 European Parliament elections," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 425-446, September.
    8. Ellen Quintelier & Soetkin Verhaegen & Marc Hooghe, 2014. "The Intergenerational Transmission of European Identity: The Role of Gender and Discussion within Families," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1103-1119, September.
    9. Tanja A. Börzel & Philipp Broniecki & Miriam Hartlapp & Lukas Obholzer, 2023. "Contesting Europe: Eurosceptic Dissent and Integration Polarization in the European Parliament," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1100-1118, July.
    10. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    11. Colantone, Italo & Ottaviano, Gianmarco & Stanig, Piero, 2021. "The backlash of globalization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113860, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kristine Mitchell, 2015. "Rethinking the ‘Erasmus Effect’ on European Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 330-348, March.
    13. Liberini, Federica & Oswald, Andrew J. & Proto, Eugenio & Redoano, Michela, 2019. "Was Brexit triggered by the old and unhappy? Or by financial feelings?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 287-302.
    14. Hugo Oriola & Matthieu Picault, 2025. "Political central bank coverage," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 573-647, June.
    15. Alessandro Borin & Elisa Macchi & Michele Mancini, 2021. "EU transfers and euroscepticism: can’t buy me love?," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 36(106), pages 237-286.
    16. Antonio Amuza & Bianca Fox & Valentina Marinescu, 2025. "Social Media Strategies in Second-Order Elections: Insights From the 2019 European Election Campaign," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    17. Tito Boeri & Prachi Mishra & Chris Papageorgiou & Antonio Spilimbergo, 2021. "Populism and Civil Society," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(352), pages 863-895, October.
    18. Chankseliani, Maia, 2018. "The politics of student mobility: Links between outbound student flows and the democratic development of post-Soviet Eurasia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 281-288.
    19. Christof Van Mol & Helga AG de Valk & Leo van Wissen, 2015. "Falling in love with(in) Europe: European bi-national love relationships, European identification and transnational solidarity," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(4), pages 469-489, December.
    20. Daniela Braun & Markus Tausendpfund, 2020. "Electoral Behaviour in a European Union under Stress," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 28-40.
    21. Italo Colantone & Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano & Piero Stanig, 2021. "The Backlash of Globalization," CESifo Working Paper Series 9289, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:10077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.