IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v58y2020is1p13-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU's New Normal: Consolidating European Integration in an Era of Populism and Geo‐Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Christiansen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Christiansen, 2020. "The EU's New Normal: Consolidating European Integration in an Era of Populism and Geo‐Economics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(S1), pages 13-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:s1:p:13-27
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Beeson, 2018. "Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 240-256, July.
    2. James A. Caporaso, 2018. "Europe's Triple Crisis and the Uneven Role of Institutions: the Euro, Refugees and Brexit," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(6), pages 1345-1361, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    2. Theofanis Exadaktylos & Roberta Guerrina & Emanuele Massetti, 2021. "A Year like no Other: Hope out of Despair?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 5-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michelle Egan, 2019. "EU Single Market(s) after Brexit," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 19-29.
    2. Daniele Archibugi & Marco Cellini & Mattia Vitiello, 2019. "Refugees in the European Union: from emergency alarmism to common management," Management Working Papers 17, Birkbeck Department of Management, revised Feb 2021.
    3. Tudor Mugurel AURSULESEI & Ștefan Cătălin TOPLICEANU & Liviu-George MAHA, 2020. "The relationship between the European Union's economic power status and the economic convergence of the Member States," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 6(1), pages 24-43, June.
    4. M A J van Hulsen & K I M Rohde & N J A van Exel, 2022. "Consideration of others and consideration of future consequences predict cooperation in an acute social dilemma: an application to COVID-19," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 1, pages 1-11.
    5. Thomas Christiansen & Bongchul Kim, 2023. "EU-Korea trade relations in the context of global disruption: political and legal perspectives," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 527-544, December.
    6. Judith Rohde‐Liebenau, 2020. "Raising European Citizens? European Identity in European Schools," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1504-1522, November.
    7. Alan Collins & Adam Cox & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2022. "A picture of regret: An empirical investigation of post-Brexit referendum survey data," Rationality and Society, , vol. 34(1), pages 56-77, February.
    8. Zhao Wei & Ruet Joël, 2020. "Managing the “Post Miracle” Economy in China:," Post-Print hal-03085784, HAL.
    9. Andrzej Jakubowski & Tomasz Komornicki & Karol Kowalczyk & Andrzej Miszczuk, 2020. "Poland as a hub of the Silk Road Economic Belt: is the narrative of opportunity supported by developments on the ground?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 367-396, September.
    10. Zhiheng Wu & Guisheng Hou & Baogui Xin, 2020. "Has the Belt and Road Initiative Brought New Opportunities to Countries Along the Routes to Participate in Global Value Chains?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    11. Abdul Sattar & Muhammad Noshab Hussain & Muhammad Ilyas, 2022. "An Impact Evaluation of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on Environmental Degradation," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:s1:p:13-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.