IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v14y2026a12064.html

Constructing Gender Antagonism: Moralised Platform Governance in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zexu Guan

    (School of International Politics and Communication, Beijing Language and Culture University, China)

  • Zheyu Shang

    (Institute for Area Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands)

Abstract

“Gender antagonism” ( xingbie duili ) has emerged on Chinese social media platforms as a prevailing term, and subsequently as a governance category for regulating online disputes. Adopting a power-sensitive approach, which scrutinises the interplay between the production of meaning and the allocation of communication resources, this study examines how “gender antagonism” is dynamically constructed between users, platforms, and the state through the case of Weibo. Employing critical discourse analysis of user jury voting records, Weibo’s disclosures, and state policy documents, we argue that gender antagonism is not an objective description of gender disputes, but a discursive framework initially mobilised by some users and later institutionalised by platforms and state authorities. The pervasive moralised deployment of this term in platform governance marginalises discussions of gender equality and delegitimises critiques of mainstream gender norms amid China’s crisis of population reproduction. While this discursive construction reflects a moralised platform governance pattern and transfers into effective online visibility control, it eschews gender equality, failing to alleviate long-standing tensions in China’s social governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zexu Guan & Zheyu Shang, 2026. "Constructing Gender Antagonism: Moralised Platform Governance in China," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12064
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.12064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/12064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.12064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:fbu27_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawer, Annabelle & Harracá, Martín, 2025. "Inconsistent platform governance and social contagion of misconduct in digital ecosystems: A complementors perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    2. Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Hosany, Sameer & Xia, Yusen & Schoenherr, Tobias & Xia, Lan, 2025. "Market competition in the platform economy: new insights, integrative framework and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Markus P. Zimmer & Stefanie Habersang & Leonhard Dobusch & Maren Gierlich-Joas & Elke Schüßler & Benjamin Mueller & Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Julia Zeller-Lanzl & Stephan Bohn , 2025. "Digital Responsibility: Building Bridges Between Organization Theory and Information Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 597-642, December.
    4. Lei Huang & Miltos Ladikas & Guangxi He & Julia Hahn & Jens Schippl, 2021. "A multi-sided market of personal data resource allocation: An empirical study of China’s car-hailing platform," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 22(3-4), pages 189-211, September.
    5. Steve Rolf & Seth Schindler, 2023. "The US–China rivalry and the emergence of state platform capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(5), pages 1255-1280, August.
    6. Chang Zhang & Lexuan Wang, 2025. "Virtual Worlds, Real Politics: A Cross‐National Comparative Study of Metaverse Policy Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    7. Mirna Rahmadina Gumati, 2024. "Digital Sovereignty or Regulatory Overreach? The Case of Indonesia’s Platform Registration Policy," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 25(4), pages 131-146, December.
    8. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content," SocArXiv tgnrj, Center for Open Science.
    9. K. Gruszka & M. Scholz-Wäckerle & E. Aigner, 2020. "Correction to: Planetary carambolage: The evolutionary political economy of technology, nature and work," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 295-295, November.
    10. Wu, Mian & Liu, Yulong & Chung, Henry F.L. & Guo, Shoujia, 2022. "When and how mobile payment platform complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and modularization analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 843-854.
    11. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22.
    12. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    13. Sanna Malinen, 2021. "Boundary Control as Gatekeeping in Facebook Groups," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 73-81.
    14. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2021. "Determinant Factors for Adoption of Government as a Platform in South Korea: Mediating Effects on the Perception of Intelligent Information Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Xintong Liang & Guangsi Li & Junkai Ma & Gaoyang Jiang, 2025. "How do signaling and reputation function as critical clues to e-commerce platform governance? Evidence from Chinese rice transaction data," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 3637-3661, October.
    16. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Hofmann, Jeanette & Kersting, Norbert & Ritzi, Claudia & Schünemann, Wolf J., 2019. "Politikwissenschaft und die digitale Gesellschaft," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 9-23.
    18. Konrad Degen & Alexander Gleiss, 2025. "Time to break up? The case for tailor-made digital platform regulation based on platform-governance standard types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Gorwa, Robert, 2021. "Elections, institutions, and the regulatory politics of platform governance: The case of the German NetzDG," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    20. Shalini Kapali Kurumathur & Paras Bhatt & Rohit Valecha & Govind Hariharan & H. Raghav Rao, 2025. "Examination of Polarization in Social Media in Aggressor-Oriented and Victim-Oriented Discourse Following Vigilantism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1393-1412, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v14:y:2026:a:12064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.