IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v27y2025i4d10.1007_s10796-024-10578-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examination of Polarization in Social Media in Aggressor-Oriented and Victim-Oriented Discourse Following Vigilantism

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Kapali Kurumathur

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Paras Bhatt

    (The University of Alabama in Huntsville)

  • Rohit Valecha

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)

  • Govind Hariharan

    (Coles College of Business, Kennesaw State University)

  • H. Raghav Rao

    (University of Texas at San Antonio)

Abstract

In the year 2020, two real-world vigilantism incidents invited nationwide discourses on social media: the fatal shooting of two men by Kyle Rittenhouse (an aggressor) and the murder of Ahmaud Arbery (a victim). The public engaged vigorously in social media discussions of approval or disapproval of the aggressor or victim in such vigilantism incidents. While diversity of opinions is a healthy driver of advancement, extreme polarization can be a powerful barrier to achieving societal progress and human flourishing. In this paper, we first examine public opinion regarding these vigilantism incidents. We identify various issues expressed in social media conversations and find that compared to victim-oriented discourse, aggressor-oriented discourse on vigilantism displays more opinion polarization. The discourses show that aggressor-oriented vigilantism discussions largely support vigilantism, self-defense, and the right to bear arms. On the other hand, victim-oriented discourses largely disapprove of vigilantism incidents. We also find that positive emotions in discourses are more polarized compared to negative emotions. Our work has practical implications concerning polarization on social media after devastating events.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Kapali Kurumathur & Paras Bhatt & Rohit Valecha & Govind Hariharan & H. Raghav Rao, 2025. "Examination of Polarization in Social Media in Aggressor-Oriented and Victim-Oriented Discourse Following Vigilantism," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1393-1412, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10578-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-024-10578-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-024-10578-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-024-10578-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:27:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-024-10578-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.