IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2013v2p329-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romania Alignment To Eu Requirements Concerning The Services Integration In The Internal Market

Author

Listed:
  • Paul-Bogdan Zamfir

    (Constantin Brancusi University Of Targu-Jiu, Romania)

Abstract

Taking into account the quality of Romania as a member with full rights and obligations of the EU, our country in accordance with the commitments undertaken by Treaty of Adheration, has implemented the free movement of services principle. At the same time the adoption of the directive on services in the internal market of European Commission and the implementation of the additional measures from the action plan to strengthen and enhance the competitiveness of European enterprises, is equal with the full liberalisation of the EU services market and therefore with the obligation to eliminate of all trade barriers which can be in front of free movement of services. In accordance with the requirements of services flows liberalization in the internal market, for Romania is becoming increasingly necessary the enhancing of the services production competitiveness which should develop the interest of decision makers at micro-and macro-economic level. The impact on Romania of the services integration in the internal market requires both a series of benefits and costs, which we present below.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul-Bogdan Zamfir, 2013. "Romania Alignment To Eu Requirements Concerning The Services Integration In The Internal Market," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 329-334, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2013:v:2:p:329-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2013-02/51_Zamfir%20Paul.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabienne Ilzkovitz & Adriaan Dierx & Viktoria Kovacs & Nuno Sousa, 2007. "Steps towards a deeper economic integration: the internal market in the 21st century," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 271, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    2. Kox, Henk L.M. & Lejour, Arjan, 2006. "Dynamic effects of European services liberalisation: more to be gained," MPRA Paper 3751, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arjan Lejour & Gerard Verweij, 2008. "Two quantative scenarios for the future of manufacturing in Europe," CPB Document 160, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/5l6uh8ogmqildh09h2q8j620g is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Schouteten, Joachim & Van Lembergen, Katrien & Molnár, Adrienn & Tarantini, Federico & Heene, Aimé & Gellynck, Xavier, 2014. "The European Food Prices Monitoring Tool as a Prerequisite for more Price Transparency in the Food Chain," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199387, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    4. Patrick Messerlin, 2010. "The European Community commercial policy," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-00972936, HAL.
    5. Pitelis, Christos & Kelmendi, Pellumb, 2009. "The political economy of European anti-trust and industrial policy," MPRA Paper 23941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benjamin Jung, 2011. "Sorting It Out: Technical Barriers to Trade and Industry Productivity," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 93-117, February.
    7. Tingsong Jiang & Warwick McKibbin, 2009. "What Does a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific Mean to China?," Chapters, in: Chunlai Chen (ed.), China’s Integration with the Global Economy, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Deloitte, 2016. "Analysis of costs, benefits, opportunities and risks in respect of the options for the modernisation of the VAT aspects of cross-border e-Commerce," Taxation Studies 0068, Directorate General Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission.
    9. Rosina Moreno & Jordi Suriñach, 2014. "Innovation adoption and productivity growth: evidence for Europe," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 86(02), pages 62-87.
    10. Christos N. Pitelis & Pellumb Kelmendi, 2011. "European Industrial Policy: Perspectives, Trends and a Sustainability-focused New Framework," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Bianka Dettmer, 2012. "The European Union's service directive: Contrasting ex ante estimates with empirical evidence," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-019, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    12. Marta Paczos, 2018. "Modelling the Economic Effects of Trade Policies – A Submission to the Treasury and International Trade Committees inquiry into implications of the UK's approach to international trade," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Policy Papers 07, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    13. Fritz Breuss, 2009. "Ten Years of EMU – Achievements, Weaknesses, Challenges," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 14(1), pages 49-72, April.
    14. Martin Jes Iversen & Mats Larsson, 2011. "Strategic transformations in Danish and Swedish big business in an era of globalisation, 1973-2008," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 119-143.
    15. Rukhsana Rasheed & Mazhar Nadeem Ishaq & Rabea Anwar, 2022. "Productive Efficiency of the European Union Member Countries: An Economic Assessment in Post?Brexit Perspective," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(2), pages 164-172, June.
    16. Swati Dhingra & Hanwei Huang & Gianmarco Ottaviano & João Paulo Pessoa & Thomas Sampson & John Van Reenen, 2017. "The costs and benefits of leaving the EU: trade effects," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 32(92), pages 651-705.
    17. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu, 2021. "Merging macroeconomic and territorial determinants of regional growth: the MASST4 model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 66(1), pages 19-56, February.
    18. Gabriel Felbermayr & Benedikt Heid & Mario Larch & Erdal Yalcin, 2015. "Macroeconomic potentials of transatlantic free trade: a high resolution perspective for Europe and the world," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 30(83), pages 491-537.
    19. UNGUREANU Alexandra, 2020. "Innovation As A Development Factor Of The Global Economy Entrepreneurship," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 410-421, December.
    20. Stefano Micossi, 2016. "30 Years of the Single European Market," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 41, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2013:v:2:p:329-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ecobici Nicolae to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.