IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlhor/v46y2019i1id221-2016-hortsci.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of solid phase of digestate for production of growing horticultural substrates

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Dubský

    (Department of Breeding and Growing Technologies, Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Šárka Chaloupková

    (Department of Breeding and Growing Technologies, Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Průhonice, Czech Republic)

  • Lukáš Kaplan

    (Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Stanislava Vondráčková

    (Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Tlustoš

    (Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Solid phase of digestate (SD) of agricultural biogas plants, containing undecomposed fibrous fractions of organic matter, is usable as a constituent of growing substrates. The content of soluble salts and available nutrients is limiting for SD addition into growing substrates. For addition of SD with initial 80% moisture its content of ammonium nitrogen and available potassium is limiting. The SD with natural moistness can be used in peat based substrates up to 10% volume. The content of ammonium nitrogen during the drying of SD with the use of waste heat from biogas plants is decreased. Optimal proportion of dry SD (dSD) in peat based substrates ranged from 20 to 40% volume. Peat based substrates with 20% volume of dSD had suitable physical and chemical (e.g. content of available potassium < 300 mg/l) properties. These dSD-peat growing substrates have been successfully tested in greenhouse experiments with pot plants (Petunia, Impatiens, and Pelargonium). The addition of dSD to peat based substrates increased air capacity and decreased easily available water content. However, the basic fertilization of the dSD-peat growing substrates is necessary to optimize the content of nutrients.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Dubský & Šárka Chaloupková & Lukáš Kaplan & Stanislava Vondráčková & Pavel Tlustoš, 2019. "Use of solid phase of digestate for production of growing horticultural substrates," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 34-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:46:y:2019:i:1:id:221-2016-hortsci
    DOI: 10.17221/221/2016-HORTSCI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/221/2016-HORTSCI.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/221/2016-HORTSCI.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/221/2016-HORTSCI?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abubaker, J. & Risberg, K. & Pell, M., 2012. "Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 126-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiří Balík & Martin Kulhánek & Jindřich Černý & Ondřej Sedlář & Pavel Suran, 2019. "Impact of organic and mineral fertilising on aluminium mobility and extractability in two temperate Cambisols," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(12), pages 581-587.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Fiala, Marco & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Lema, Juan M. & Moreira, María Teresa, 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 625-635.
    2. Motte, Jean-Charles & Sambusiti, Cecilia & Dumas, Claire & Barakat, Abdellatif, 2015. "Combination of dry dark fermentation and mechanical pretreatment for lignocellulosic deconstruction: An innovative strategy for biofuels and volatile fatty acids recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 67-73.
    3. Pan Zhao & Shuang Zhang & Xiaona Wang & Haishu Sun & Yan Guo & Qunhui Wang & Xiaohong Sun, 2023. "Research Progress on Anaerobic Digestion of Cellulose Waste Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Jan Moestedt & Sören Nilsson Påledal & Anna Schnürer & Erik Nordell, 2013. "Biogas Production from Thin Stillage on an Industrial Scale—Experience and Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Li, Wei & Guo, Jianbin & Cheng, Huicai & Wang, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2017. "Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 613-622.
    6. Kerstin Nielsen & Christina-Luise Roß & Marieke Hoffmann & Andreas Muskolus & Frank Ellmer & Timo Kautz, 2020. "The Chemical Composition of Biogas Digestates Determines Their Effect on Soil Microbial Activity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Al Afif, Rafat & Linke, Bernd, 2019. "Biogas production from three-phase olive mill solid waste in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1046-1052.
    8. Franco Curadelli & Marcelo Alberto & Ernesto Martín Uliarte & Mariana Combina & Iván Funes-Pinter, 2023. "Meta-Analysis of Yields of Crops Fertilized with Compost Tea and Anaerobic Digestate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin & Liliana Paschia & Nicoleta Luminita Gudanescu Nicolau & Gabriel Cucui & Dan Marius Coman & Sorina Geanina Stanescu, 2019. "The Analysis of the Economic Effects on the Greening and Recovery of the Sludge Waste Resulting from the Biogas Production Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra, R. & Liu, Zhen & Lund, Mogens, 2017. "The impact of biogas technology adoption for farm households – Empirical evidence from mixed crop and livestock farming systems in Indonesia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1371-1378.
    11. Wenyan Chen & Qiang Cai & Yuan Zhao & Guojuan Zheng & Yuting Liang, 2014. "Toxicity Evaluation of Pig Slurry Using Luminescent Bacteria and Zebrafish," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Jacek Pranagal & Sławomir Ligęza & Halina Smal & Joanna Gmitrowicz-Iwan, 2023. "Effects of Waste Application (Carboniferous Rock and Post-Fermentation Sludge) on Soil Quality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Krzysztof Józef Jankowski & Bogdan Dubis, 2024. "Jerusalem Artichoke: Nitrogen Fertilization Strategy and Energy Balance in the Production Technology of Aerial Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    15. Karin S. Levin & Felizitas Winkhart & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen & Hans Jürgen Reents & Karl Auerswald, 2023. "Artefacts in Field Trial Research—Lateral Ammonia Fluxes Confound Fertiliser Plot Experiments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    16. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    17. Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven & Pelkmans, Luc & Guisson, Ruben & Reumermann, Patrick & Luzardo, Nathalie Marquez & Witters, Nele & Broeze, Jan, 2013. "A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 611-622.
    18. Irina N. Vikhareva & Guliya K. Aminova & Aliya K. Mazitova, 2022. "Resource Cycling: Application of Anaerobic Utilization Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Gioacchino Pappalardo & Roberta Selvaggi & Salvatore Bracco & Gaetano Chinnici & Biagio Pecorino, 2018. "Factors affecting purchasing process of digestate: evidence from an economic experiment on Sicilian farmers’ willingness to pay," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Begum, Sameena & Ahuja, Shruti & Anupoju, Gangagni Rao & Kuruti, Kranti & Juntupally, Sudharshan & Gandu, Bharath & Ahuja, D.K., 2017. "Process intensification with inline pre and post processing mechanism for valorization of poultry litter through high rate biomethanation technology: A full scale experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 428-436.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:46:y:2019:i:1:id:221-2016-hortsci. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.