IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v99y2012icp126-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities

Author

Listed:
  • Abubaker, J.
  • Risberg, K.
  • Pell, M.

Abstract

Residues from the biogas process are a relatively new type of organic fertiliser with composition varying with origin of the raw material fed into the biogas process. The performance of four different biogas residues (BRs) was evaluated and compared with that of pig slurry (PS) and mineral fertiliser (NPK) in pots filled with sandy soil and fertilised at rates corresponding to 35, 70 and 140kg NH4+–N ha−1. After sowing with spring wheat, the pots were incubated in a growth chamber. Total biomass yield and relative yields of ear, straw and root fractions were measured at harvest. Nitrogen mineralisation capacity (NMC) and potential ammonium oxidation rate (PAO) in soil were assessed. The fertilisation based on NH4+–N led to high addition of Tot C, Org N, Tot P, Tot K, Tot Mg and Zn at application of PS compared with BR. Biomass yields generally increased with increasing fertiliser rate but the response varied between the fertilisers. The BR yields compared well with NPK, but PS resulted in significantly higher yields. PS gave lower relative biomass of ears and higher relative biomass of roots compared with BR and NPK. The BR treatment yielding the lowest overall biomass also produced plants with the lowest relative root biomass, but partly compensated for this by increasing the relative ear biomass with increasing fertiliser rate. The NMC and PAO in soil had increased by the end of the experiment in almost all treatments. The high NMC in the PS treatment resulted in calculated mineralised N corresponding to 50–82kgha−1 during the experimental period. In conclusion, fertilisation with biogas residues gave similar biomass yields but increased NMC and PAO in soil compared with NPK. Pig slurry gave the overall highest yields and NMC, but a PAO comparable to most BR.

Suggested Citation

  • Abubaker, J. & Risberg, K. & Pell, M., 2012. "Biogas residues as fertilisers – Effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 126-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:99:y:2012:i:c:p:126-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261912003492
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.04.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Odlare, M. & Arthurson, V. & Pell, M. & Svensson, K. & Nehrenheim, E. & Abubaker, J., 2011. "Land application of organic waste - Effects on the soil ecosystem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2210-2218, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Aditi & Kumar, Ashwani & Sharma, Satyawati & Vijay, V.K., 2013. "Comparative evaluation of raw and detoxified mahua seed cake for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1514-1521.
    2. Cheng, Shikun & Li, Zifu & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Neupane, Kalidas & Wauthelet, Marc & Huba, Elisabeth-Maria, 2014. "Application of fault tree approach for technical assessment of small-sized biogas systems in Nepal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1372-1381.
    3. Hastik, Richard & Basso, Stefano & Geitner, Clemens & Haida, Christin & Poljanec, Aleš & Portaccio, Alessia & Vrščaj, Borut & Walzer, Chris, 2015. "Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 608-623.
    4. Ericsson, Niclas & Nordberg, Åke & Sundberg, Cecilia & Ahlgren, Serina & Hansson, Per-Anders, 2014. "Climate impact and energy efficiency from electricity generation through anaerobic digestion or direct combustion of short rotation coppice willow," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 86-98.
    5. Kao, Chien-Ya & Chiu, Sheng-Yi & Huang, Tzu-Ting & Dai, Le & Hsu, Ling-Kang & Lin, Chih-Sheng, 2012. "Ability of a mutant strain of the microalga Chlorella sp. to capture carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 176-183.
    6. Van Dael, Miet & Van Passel, Steven & Pelkmans, Luc & Guisson, Ruben & Reumermann, Patrick & Luzardo, Nathalie Marquez & Witters, Nele & Broeze, Jan, 2013. "A techno-economic evaluation of a biomass energy conversion park," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 611-622.
    7. Jaan Kuht & Viacheslav Eremeev & Liina Talgre & Maarika Alaru & Evelin Loit & Erkki Mäeorg & Keyvan Esmaeilzadeh-Salestani & Anne Luik, 2019. "Changes in the Soil Microbial Hydrolytic Activity and the Content of Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen by Growing Spring Barley Undersown with Red Clover in Different Farming Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:99:y:2012:i:c:p:126-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.