The Best Asset Pricing Model for Estimating Industry Costs of Equity in Tunisia
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has dominated finance theory for over 30 years; it suggests that the market beta alone is sufficient to explain security returns. However, evidence shows that the cross-section of stock returns cannot be described solely by the one-factor CAPM. Alternative studies have been proposed in response to the poor performance of the standard CAPM. The main contribution of this paper is to offer to investors planning to invest the appropriate model for estimating the cost of equity in the Tunisian market. The paper allows choosing among the CAPM, the Fama&French asset-pricing model (TPFM), and the Four Factor Pricing Model (FFPM), which adds a third and fourth moment to estimate the cost of equity of firms listed on the Tunisian stock market. In addition to the classic, the selection of the best model is based on information criteria: the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and the Schwartz Information Criteria (SIC). The simple FFPM of Cahart proved to be the selected model.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 5 (2010)
Issue (Month): 3 (February)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rmeef|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rmeecf:v:5:y:2010:i:3:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.