Rule of Tangent for Win-By-Two Games
Our study of win-by-two tie games is motivated by a famous 2010 Wimbledon tennis match whose final set was decided by the improbable score of 70-68. We introduce a trigonometric interpretation of the odds of winning points and games in tennis when serving from deuce. We place this result in the more general setting of a gamblers ruin problem and also propose a performance measure to quantify the serving and receiving skill of one player relative to another. Then we extend the analysis to table tennis and volleyball. These latter games are similar to tennis in that the winner must obtain a certain minimum score while leading by two points, but they differ in their determination of which player serves a given rally and in whether a point is awarded to the receiver for winning a rally. We quantify the impact of these differences on the outcomes of games, assuming that the probability for a player to win a single point does not change during a game. We also apply a Markov chain analysis to arrive at our earlier results for tennis and to calculate the expected length of a game after reaching deuce. Finally, we develop the idea of equivalent games so that the analysis can be carried out using only the probability of winning a point (that is, without regard for the question of which player is serving).
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 7 (2011)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com |
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jqas|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:4:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.