IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jossai/v3y2015i5p451-462n6.html

Research on the Evaluation of Enterprises’ Green Growth Efficiency Based on DEMATEL-DEA

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Xinghong

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian116024, China)

  • Wu Chunyou

    (Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian116024, China)

  • Kuang Haibo

    (School of Transportation Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian116026, China)

Abstract

With the transformation of economic growth modes, green growth is becoming the main source of global economic growth for the future. Enterprises are the main carriers of the economic growth in a country or a region, and enterprises’ green growth efficiency determines the regional sustainable growth ability. On this basis, this paper investigates the problem of enterprises’ green growth efficiency in China and identifies the input and output indexes of the green growth using the DEMATEL method. Then, through the super efficiency DEA model, this paper measures the enterprise green growth efficiency of 31 regions in China in the years 2003, 2007 and 2012. In accordance with the four parts, including the East, the Central, the West and the Northeast, this paper completes a spatial and temporal variation analysis. The results show that there is an obvious regional difference in enterprise green growth efficiency in China during the above 3 years. Ranking the average efficiency from high to low, the order is as follows: the West, Central region, the Northeast and the East. Enterprise green growth efficiency shows a rising trend in the Northeast, and other regions show a downward trend. The enterprise green growth efficiency in the East is higher than the national average, and the efficiency in the other regions is less than the national average.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Xinghong & Wu Chunyou & Kuang Haibo, 2015. "Research on the Evaluation of Enterprises’ Green Growth Efficiency Based on DEMATEL-DEA," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 3(5), pages 451-462, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:451-462:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/JSSI-2015-0451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/JSSI-2015-0451
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/JSSI-2015-0451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    2. Danielle Resnick & Finn Tarp & James Thurlow, 2012. "The Political Economy Of Green Growth: Cases From Southern Africa," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 215-228, August.
    3. Banker, R. D. & Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Clarke, R., 1989. "Constrained game formulations and interpretations for data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 299-308, June.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1979. "Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 339-338, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2003. "Yardstick Based Procurement Design In Natural Resource Management," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25910, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Rick Antle & Peter Bogetoft, 2019. "Mix Stickiness Under Asymmetric Cost Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2787-2812, June.
    3. Peter Bogetoft & Kurt Nielsen, 2002. "DEA Based Yardstick Competition in Natural Resource Management," CIE Discussion Papers 2002-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. Centre for Industrial Economics.
    4. Bogetoft, Peter, 1995. "Incentives and productivity measurements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 67-77, April.
    5. Peter Bogetoft, 2000. "DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 7-48, January.
    6. Bogetoft, Peter & Nielsen, Kurt, 2008. "DEA based auctions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 685-700, January.
    7. repec:lan:wpaper:1115 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. M. Lábaj & M. Luptáčik & E. Nežinský, 2014. "Data envelopment analysis for measuring economic growth in terms of welfare beyond GDP," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 41(3), pages 407-424, August.
    9. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    10. A Basso & S Funari, 2003. "Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: a DEA approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 521-531, May.
    11. Tai-Hsi Wu & Hsiang-Lin Chih & Mei-Chen Lin & Yi Hua Wu, 2020. "A Data Envelopment Analysis-Based Methodology Adopting Assurance Region Approach for Measuring Corporate Social Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 863-892, April.
    12. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Per J. Agrell & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami & Pegah Khoshnevis, 2017. "The role of multiplier bounds in fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(1), pages 249-276, March.
    13. Ertürk, Mehmet & Türüt-AsIk, Serap, 2011. "Efficiency analysis of Turkish natural gas distribution companies by using data envelopment analysis method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1426-1438, March.
    14. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 980-988.
    15. Ströhl, Florian & Borsch, Erik & Souren, Rainer, 2018. "Integration von Gewichtsrestriktionen in das DEA-Modell nach Charnes, Cooper und Rhodes: Exemplarische Optionen und Auswirkungen," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 3, number 32018.
    16. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "A maximum slacks-based measure of efficiency for closed series production systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "Closest targets in the slacks-based measure of efficiency for production units with multi-period data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1042-1054.
    18. Puertas, Rosa & Guaita-Martinez, José M. & Carracedo, Patricia & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2022. "Analysis of European environmental policies: Improving decision making through eco-efficiency," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Aziz KUTLAR & Ali KABASAKAL & Adem BABACAN, 2015. "Dynamic Efficiency of Turkish Banks: a DEA Window and Malmquist Index Analysis for the Period of 2003-2012," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 23(24).
    20. Cherchye, Laurens & Van Puyenbroeck, Tom, 2001. "Product mixes as objects of choice in non-parametric efficiency measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 287-295, July.
    21. Halme, Merja & Korhonen, Pekka & Eskelinen, Juha, 2014. "Non-convex value efficiency analysis and its application to bank branch sales evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-18.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jossai:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:451-462:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.